Ii's important to know the underlying facts in order to educated others. The word needs to get out about the flawed reasoning in this and other articles that are pushing the control narrative.
From the article...
Globally, about 3.4% of reported COVID-19 cases have died. By comparison, seasonal flu generally kills far fewer than 1% of those infected.
What is the misleading word in this statement?
Cases is not the same as cause of death.
Anyone who has tested positive (case # blah, blah since now a record exists) from what has been reported as a test with 90% false positive and has died is then to be classified as the cause of death as COVID-19 (source nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html, off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless. This is scientifically unsound basis for the conclusion of continued lockdowns, masks, etc. That is because their motivation isn't to help the people its to control the people.
Ii's important to know the underlying facts in order to educated others. The word needs to get out about the flawed reasoning in this and other articles that are pushing the control narrative.
From the article...
Globally, about 3.4% of reported COVID-19 cases have died. By comparison, seasonal flu generally kills far fewer than 1% of those infected.
What is the misleading word in this statement?
Cases is not the same as cause of death.
Anyone who has tested positive (case # blah, blah since now a record exists) from what has been reported as a test with 90% false positive and has died is then to be classified as the cause of death as COVID-19 (source nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html, off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless. This is scientifically unsound basis for the conclusion of continued lockdowns, masks, etc. That is because their motivation isn't to help the people its to control the people.