As someone who's beginning to research Q, I've heard that Q has made various predictions that have turned out to be wrong. What does the community make of this?
Comments (19)
sorted by:
Yes - running away with interpretations has been a big problem,
Making predictions is hard.
Especially about the future.
Exactly ?
Yeah...it's the people that interpret the bread crumbs that make the predictions.
Many of the predictions that people say are "wrong" are only because the Q drops are bread crumbs that are very cryptic in their message. This means that they can be wrongfully misinterpreted...which makes people think that they are "wrong predictions"
IF it was for sure something that Q said then the community at large will call that “disinformation “ used to throw off the enemy.
If it was just a date that someone made up or an interpretation of something Q said. Then we call that “datefagging”. The onus is on the person who misinterpreted what Q said.
Much of what Q posts is classified. Q can’t just come out and tell us specifically what’s going on without breaking the law. Q gives us crumbs. Suggest looking at one of the stickied posts about “Q Proofs” there are enough proofs to be fairly sure Q is real.
I was actually talking with someone else about this. He mentioned dates of arrests for Clinton, Podesta, and others, as well as Sessions being one to trust.
That was not a Q prediction...it was an anon that posted the dates and Q only replied to it and neither confirmed nor denied.
Correct, some other person (truly anyone like you or me) posted that and Q replied to it.
It is difficult to explain it all without starting at post #1 and reading them all.
ALL.
Understand that many of us have followed and read Q daily over the past three years. We have had a lot of time to absorb the drops, match them to real-life events taking place at that time, match 0-delta tweets to Trump and Q's posts going up at the same time.
I am all for more people reading and understanding Q but you have to put in the time and read everything. It is not going to be easy to absorb and understand it all if you aren't willing to do this. You are trying to absorb it all in days - which is possible - but you will need to commit & go on a crash reading course.
Exactly ?
It was Q drop #1 for reference
I look at Qdrops as if someone wrote a plan, then cut the plan into sections. Put the sections into a bowl, mixed them up and randomly draw them out. I know this is not the case, but it keeps me from racking my brain on trying to find correlation with the order of the drops.
Q's posts are intentionally ambiguous.
Q hasn't been wrong, interpretations have, and that's to be expected.