As someone who's beginning to research Q, I've heard that Q has made various predictions that have turned out to be wrong. What does the community make of this?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
I was actually talking with someone else about this. He mentioned dates of arrests for Clinton, Podesta, and others, as well as Sessions being one to trust.
That was not a Q prediction...it was an anon that posted the dates and Q only replied to it and neither confirmed nor denied.
Correct, some other person (truly anyone like you or me) posted that and Q replied to it.
It is difficult to explain it all without starting at post #1 and reading them all.
ALL.
Understand that many of us have followed and read Q daily over the past three years. We have had a lot of time to absorb the drops, match them to real-life events taking place at that time, match 0-delta tweets to Trump and Q's posts going up at the same time.
I am all for more people reading and understanding Q but you have to put in the time and read everything. It is not going to be easy to absorb and understand it all if you aren't willing to do this. You are trying to absorb it all in days - which is possible - but you will need to commit & go on a crash reading course.
Exactly ?
It was Q drop #1 for reference