New to GW.win but NOT new to this WAR at all. Been awake since the mid 90’s, trying to red pill people the old fashioned way. Am a refugee from VOAT with same handle. Posted a little but lurked a lot. Have been lurking here since Dec 25. Most important message for today:
P R E C I P I C E
[Dictionary.com]
1 a cliff with a vertical, nearly vertical, or overhanging face.
2 a situation of great peril:
Q made 4 posts with this term /// 4685 – 4641 – 4407 – 2254
4685 Sep 12, 2020
“Only at the precipice will people find the will [strength] to change and break the system of control [be free]. “
Folks, many on here Dooming. Many on here wondering why DJT hasn’t “initiated the IA.” Many wondering why he hasn’t spoken on the EBS. Op in effect. No need.
Military moving everywhere and people still questioning. Discernment is valuable but so is logic, reason, and rationality. Q told us NG would be deployed to major cities.
Piglosi was making all kinds of threats over the weekend about 25th Am and Impeachment 2.0 but couldn’t get to DC to make it happen for the last 2 days??? Interesting . . .
Many here believe that Trump “conceded” mentioning a “Biden admin.” He did not.
Many believe the certification on the 6th was the end point, the completion of “the act.” >>> READ Completion of the crime.
HOWEVER, I believe Biden will have his inauguration = completion of the crime. Then arrests will be made and all Hell will break loose and it will be televised and be undeniable. This marks the real beginning of the Great Awakening . . . the real
P R E C I P I C E
EDIT: Like to add that it may appear that we will be w/o a President until all the criminals are arrested and the crimes enumerated to the public.
Sorry this is retarded. Something needs to be done before inauguration.
This Hollywood ending of Biden being inaugurated and then swept up fails to address the fact that the second he is inaugurated the power over the military moves to him, among other legal presidings.
I get your point.
So what was the precipice that Q was talking about? What is the edge? The red line we can't cross?
I am beginning to think Biden may be sworn in. Maybe that's what it takes for the military to step in. He takes an oath of office, and by taking it, he violates the very oath he took. Wouldn't that be ironic.
Exactly!
Him being sworn in is the completion of the crime.
IF he were to concede before then then Trump wins.
Then what???
Shortest administration of all time - recorded in the history books. No glossing over the reasons why.
This could be the exact reason it was a staged event on the 6th, to require special security(troops) for the inauguration for the arrest of Beijing joe.
Must be some reason for the extra security.
Notice how a lot of EXTRA security being moved to DC.
Then a lot of extra security going to the state capitols. I wonder why?
Didn't Q say that there would be mass rioting? Think ANTIFA.
When people start getting arrested would there be riots?
Consider this - PedoJoe is sworn in, the riots begin (ostensibly Trump supporters), PedoJoe declares marshal law - who does he tell the military to go after?
Does the military leadership have to be shown treason before they act against it?
How many corrupt leaders in the military?
What if they don't act? What are they guilty of?
Would that expose military leaders who are willing to violate their oaths?
...just throwing out some more ideas as to why this might last a bit longer than we'd like..
I’ve always thought that this thing is bigger than DJT. Maybe his entire purpose was to just be a one term president and wake up as many as possible (mission accomplished). Then like you said the Military (Q) steps in and cleans house. And who the heck cares if DJT is the pres after that. It’s so much bigger than him.
It is bigger than Trump -- this is our country and our Constitution and our freedom.
I still believe we will see DJT Admin 2.0 but the country will be returned to 1776 with the demise of USA Inc.
I pray it is so
People keep pushing this goal post.
First it was Trump had to catch them cheating, then it was them committing the crime of State Certification, then the crime of sending the fraudulent electors, then the crime of certifying Biden in congress. They've done it all.
If you keep this up, Biden will have to serve a full fraudulent term before anything is done.
I get your point -- it does look like goalpost moving.
However, IF Biden gets up on the 20th and decides to concede can you then arrest him for accepting the results of a fraudulent election?
Why or why not?
Who can you arrest at that point?
If Trump has enough data to invalidate the election, I’m confident he’d have enough to implicate mr sniffs.
I am too, but you failed to answer my questions.
IF Biden conceded did he commit a crime? Can you arrest him? Who can you arrest IF he were to concede at the last minute, say, out of fear?
You criticize yet you can't reply.
Him conceding or not may not matter. If he knowingly was in on election theft while being supported by foreign powers, he's already committed numerous crimes. If he was being funded by foreigners and never disclosed it as per the transition act, he's also committed crimes. So you could still arrest him regardless, if you could (of course) prove it.
The only way, as you pose it, that he wouldn't be arrested if he conceded, is if it was for a plea deal. That's my opinion and I'm not an attorney.
Then Kamala is pres.
Welcome back to the fold. I was also at voat
TY
God... 5 minutes ago everyone KNEW something would happen before the inauguration day. Now some new guy defines what a precipice is and paints a story and half of you begin to try and rationalize how it's immediately true. I'm not dooming, but holy shit, take something with a grain of salt every now and then. Stick to THE PLAN. Don't let some account that's literally 1 hour old, with 17 comments make you abandon what you (and we) have been reading into with these drops for the past 3+ years. My god...
How does this negate "The Plan?"
My point is that what DJT said today that alludes to a "Biden Administration" IS part of the plan.
Threatened much?
How does any of what I said mean that I'm threatened? It's just interesting that on the eve of potentially the best day in modern history you come up with an alternative ending to something that has not been dropped about, written about, or frankly even considered by anyone else, at least in any major way, and you get mad that people question it? Sounds like I'm not the one threatened here....
This reads exactly like your threatened.
How is what I said not sticking to the plan?
Why does someone who thinks outside the box threaten you?
BTW- it has been "dropped about" which is what I'm pointing out. 4 times Q said precipice and I am defining how that would work.
It's not thinking outside the box if it's not plausible. I implore you to find anything Q related/dropped that supports your theory. If you do, and can articulate it, I'll listen. Everything from Q shows an end date, or culmination prior to any sort of inauguration, vs post inauguration of a new administration. Pompeo's tweets are better evidence of the administration not changing. T not conceding to Biden is better proof that the administration is not changing. I'm all for thinking outside of the box, hell, it's how Q got started. Showing people there's things happening beyond the realm of what's in front of them. But unsubstantiated, unsupported, hearsay reasoning is not acceptable.
Again, find proof to your conclusions and I will listen. Otherwise, deport.
And your lack of interest in trying to show proof even shows you don't believe in what you wrote. You just want to call me threatened and keep asking me why I'm threatened. I've told you I'm not, and asked for proof. But you'll just come back with something that again, doesn't further the conversation.
First of all, I never said it was a conclusion. If you know the conclusion post it I'm willing to hear it.
Second, you clearly didn't comprehend my original post to begin with. My speculation, which is fair game ON A MESSAGE BOARD I believe, is that we're going right up to Jan 20th.
Third, If you bothered to read all my replies to everyone I have conceded that I may be wrong. But that doesn't mean this won't go right to Jan 20th.
Again, if someone can show me the exact date everyone agreed this goes down please provide it because I obviously missed it.
Just for the record, I really don't give a flying sh** how or when this happens so long as it happens, which I am convinced it will -- DJT Admin 2.0 all the way!
Biden sworn in. Scare Event. First arrest Will Shock the World - Byedone.
U cannot prosecute shoplifters while they are stuffing shit into their pockets. When they walk out the door ( crime completed ) u can.
This is exactly correct!
I was a "store detective" before in a past life. Crime first, arrest second.
Nice to see another old Goat! I like the way you think (critical thinking), but it may be semantics regarding the oath or not. Biden isn't the main target at this point, rather more of a symbol at best. I have a deadline to meet but will return here to elaborate on this later this evening!
Yeah, I have no idea how far to the edge they plan to take this, but taking it to Inaugeration Day will scare the living sh** out of a lot of people.
Many people are already dooming and scared as is.
I wonder if it isn't either/or Trump or Biden being inaugurated.... but perhaps BOTH...but one is valid and one is invalid...or one real and one fake?
Inaugurations can happen privately as well as publicly.
Early on, MI said they could have begun all the arrests on their own but decided instead to try to work through the Office of the Presidency, in hopes of avoiding civil war. It might have been via Steve Pieczenik...i just recall it was very early on.
Couldn't they still do that?
What if it is BOTH / AND?
Keep praying. Good thing God knows how this will all play out.
I think if Biden is inaugurated we are done also.
You may be correct. However, I believe with Trump's words today about a Biden Admin he states that they will get to that edge, that line.
Also, a lot of scuttlebutt about Trump admin 2.0 being inaugerated in March or even April which suggests we won't have an official President for another month or so.
GLOBE BWAHAHA buh bye...
No they can’t inaugurate him because then he will be the legal leader of our nation and the military. If that happens, we really are done.
Well, I agree they can't lawfully inaugurate him or yes, he does get reins of military power which seems like it would be disastrous.
but what if there is a false/fake UNlawful inauguration that is allowed to play out?
Who among the whole official crowd that would be doing the expected inauguration ceremony isn't guilty of treason and sedition? Chief Justice Roberts???
Maybe the oppositions form of WWG1WGA
So,you're saying that politicians -- even elected fraudulently -- can't be arrested once they come into power? They're immune from the law even if, say, Military Intelligence has been watching them the whole time and documented the massive fraud???
I thought that too but Biden can accept the inaugeration = accept presidency and then be arrested for participating in a fraudulent election. I may be wrong but THAT would be a PRECIPICE IMO.
Then Kamala will be president.