Gmail has been terribly slow, last night & this morning. Taking 12+ minutes to add a 6 of .PDF (same PDF used to attach within seconds). Maryland, inside Beltway
Outage doesn't mean Google search is down completely. It means problems such as this have been reported.
I don't know why people have issues with others asking for sources. Particularly, I don't know why you assume that it's only leftists who want sources.
If you want credibility when you make a claim, then you should always provide a source, or at least reason out your logic. There's no reason to be offended when someone asks for a source or for help, because not everyone has the same knowledge base, and by providing sources, you can help others expand their own knowledge base. That's part of what "helping others to prepare" is about, as far as I can tell.
I mean, a good number of leftists probably hold the beliefs that they do because they only have the MSM as their providers of information, and they never had the personal need to look deeper. They shouldn't be snubbed when they ask for or challenge you for a source, because they might actually need some proof put under their nose before they'll question things deeper. If they're being obstinate, and actively ignoring or deriding any proof provided, then that's a different case altogether, but that shouldn't be the assumed default expectation.
Just to clarify, I'm not talking about looking up an outage map. I've just seen this criticism before, and I find it to be counter-productive. I have trouble convincing my family and co-workers of some things, because they've already given up, and were wary of Q to begin with. Being told "you're lazy, do more research" is very ineffective in trying to convince them of anything.
There’s a time and place it’s relevant to demand a source
A fucking outage map isn’t it
Like it or not, effective or not, telling people to go look it up is the correct answer
If we don’t convince people to do their own research they will always believe someone else’s opinion, you people have to learn this is what q tasked anons with
Source, please, for your assertion that leftists who are too lazy to do research almost always yell SOURCE.
Support this assertion with each of the below.
First of all, provide link to the universe of "leftists".
Then, show that any (or more preferably the subset) of that list are "too lazy to do research".
Then, show that any (or more preferably the subset) of that list who "almost always yell SOURCE".
Otherwise, I will interpret your post as an opinion that you hold all those who seek to know the source of someone's post in equal disdain as you hold lazy leftists who do not research.
Hot spot on D.C. What a coincidence.
https://downdetector.com/status/google/map/
Here's one of the latest comments-
mom my • a day ago
Gmail has been terribly slow, last night & this morning. Taking 12+ minutes to add a 6 of .PDF (same PDF used to attach within seconds). Maryland, inside Beltway
Outage doesn't mean Google search is down completely. It means problems such as this have been reported.
Can you drive in as close to the barricades and see if you can confirm if cell jammers are being used?? I would love to see someone confirm this
Source? When was this screen shot taken?
Leftists that are too lazy to do research almost always yells SOURCE? Anywho D.C. has cell phone signal blockers in place.
I don't know why people have issues with others asking for sources. Particularly, I don't know why you assume that it's only leftists who want sources.
If you want credibility when you make a claim, then you should always provide a source, or at least reason out your logic. There's no reason to be offended when someone asks for a source or for help, because not everyone has the same knowledge base, and by providing sources, you can help others expand their own knowledge base. That's part of what "helping others to prepare" is about, as far as I can tell.
I mean, a good number of leftists probably hold the beliefs that they do because they only have the MSM as their providers of information, and they never had the personal need to look deeper. They shouldn't be snubbed when they ask for or challenge you for a source, because they might actually need some proof put under their nose before they'll question things deeper. If they're being obstinate, and actively ignoring or deriding any proof provided, then that's a different case altogether, but that shouldn't be the assumed default expectation.
Just to clarify, I'm not talking about looking up an outage map. I've just seen this criticism before, and I find it to be counter-productive. I have trouble convincing my family and co-workers of some things, because they've already given up, and were wary of Q to begin with. Being told "you're lazy, do more research" is very ineffective in trying to convince them of anything.
There’s a time and place it’s relevant to demand a source
A fucking outage map isn’t it
Like it or not, effective or not, telling people to go look it up is the correct answer
If we don’t convince people to do their own research they will always believe someone else’s opinion, you people have to learn this is what q tasked anons with
DYOR
Source, please, for your assertion that leftists who are too lazy to do research almost always yell SOURCE.
Support this assertion with each of the below.
First of all, provide link to the universe of "leftists".
Then, show that any (or more preferably the subset) of that list are "too lazy to do research".
Then, show that any (or more preferably the subset) of that list who "almost always yell SOURCE".
Otherwise, I will interpret your post as an opinion that you hold all those who seek to know the source of someone's post in equal disdain as you hold lazy leftists who do not research.
And, I'll hold an opinion that you are wrong.
Easy, go to Google con, the. Search google outage map. Found it in 5sec
https://downdetector.com/status/google/map/
Just look it up, if you don’t learn to do your own research you’ll always believe someone else’s opinion