39 LOCKS
Binary: 010011001001000110010001011010100010011001011000101000101000110101001100101000101010001010001101
The first 39 binary digits must be discarded.
The remaining bits are: 001011000101000101000110101001100101000101010001010001101
Those bits in ASCII: ,QF¦QQF
Same pattern but missing a Q on the left. Where there should be a Q there is a ','
Pompeo sent a tweet on his personal account 3 minutes after he sent the one about the flags and locks. Time: 5:03
Original missing "Q"
Revised including "Q"
Coincidence?
Q
I did this myself, tried all other combinations, keeping the binary whole, not removing, removing last 39 digits or the first 39 digits, using locks as 1 and flags as 0, and locks as 0 and flags as 1.
I didn't try any diagonals or complex patterns.
The only one that didn't translate into nonsense was the process described above.
Mike Pompeo is very likely associated with Q in some manner.
Why ,QF¦QQF though?
Why not just ,Q¦QQ? This would be more straightforward.
binary for ,Q¦QQ
00101100 01010001 10100110 01010001 01010001
I can't find a connection to the picture, please try if you can, but assuming he really wanted to say QQF and not QQ. This should be examined.
Perhaps alerting about Q and knows it's fake? F for fake? Or just a random letter? Or we don't know yet? Idk, that F annoys me.
Well, then you look at the Q post 503. It says in one of the lines: DEFCON [1] CONF
There’s an F on both sides, Perhaps this is the F connection? Quite loose. Idk.