How about we take the simple route and acknowledge that there is no concrete way to determine the world population without getting skewed figures and tainted sources.

By that measure I still would suggest that you are not open to alternative viewpoints. You are wasting your time here in this case.

We are mapping out information and connecting dots and in turn building a picture that reflects a potential scenario that makes .ore sense than what we've been told and taught for so long.

Its similar to taking you to an empty patch of land and telling you to discover what is here and you simply point to the one tree and just say "there's a tree". Our approach is more akin to suggesting that there is much more below the tree worth discovering.