I was just exactly asking the same question, if they refused to hear the evidence who can we possibly go to? Provided the militaries in charge and has the evidence is what we've been told, I think that is the only final thing that we can count on, but still I do have that same question you're asking I want to know
I think the point is that so far, courts have all refused to actually review the evidence. If they take him to trial over impeachment, then they are forcing the court to allow discovery. This means Trump finally has the chance to lay it all out with the public seeing the evidence at last and then watching what the court does.
I was just exactly asking the same question, if they refused to hear the evidence who can we possibly go to? Provided the militaries in charge and has the evidence is what we've been told, I think that is the only final thing that we can count on, but still I do have that same question you're asking I want to know
I think the point is that so far, courts have all refused to actually review the evidence. If they take him to trial over impeachment, then they are forcing the court to allow discovery. This means Trump finally has the chance to lay it all out with the public seeing the evidence at last and then watching what the court does.