Honestly it sucks ass, I feel like I lost my digital home
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (101)
sorted by:
meh, T_D blocked a meme of mine years ago. I stopped contributing to them after that. They missed the Q train and censored it, too. They get what they deserve. The core of the original Q followers know all the little rally points. Be like water, my friend. Flow from one cup to another.
They are protecting their dogma. If you open the door to the possibility there may be contrary views the entire ecosystem is in peril. Why did Catholic hierarchy hide pedophile priests for so long? To admit wrong would shatter belief in The Church. Why do tenured & published archeologists refuse to discuss the age of the Sphinx? That would upend decades of "authoritative" work underlying modern archeology. Why do schools continue to promote failing students? If they admit they are failing it means the school has failed. Why do never Trumpers continue to pile on? Trump must be wrong for them to be right. The list goes on & on.
From memory but I believe I have most of it. The area around the Sphinx was carved out of a natural bedrock outcropping. There are water erosion channels surrounding it as well as water erosion on the Sphinx itself. The Egyptian Old Kingdom is from roughly 2500 BC but there is records from that time indicating it was already there when the Pyramids were built. You have to go back at least 5000 years or more (~7500 BC) to find climate conditions in Egypt with that much rainfall on a continual basis to erode the rock. This shows the erosion -
https://steemitimages.com/p/2gsjgna1uruvUuS7ndh9YqVwYGPLVszbFLwwpAYXZyBuvGcQ6MTT6pUYCqKn6kyWpVJWyYwkakPuhNf1KimAa34Wa2EiJ4fJUiKiBYHcsAtQgwzGiS?format=match&mode=fit
I disagree. What I want? I WANT Trump to have some super secret plan to fight the NWO and communistic takeover of the world and its power structures. Nothing would make me happier.
The problem I have is that the evidence for that being true isn't great.
The best chance, to me, is that a segment of the military knows the fraud led to a huge national security risk and is involved in trying to limit it.
What exactly do you disagree with? You only detail what you want.
I disagree with the idea that you don't seem to have put forth. Please excuse me, I really thought you said "they believe what they want."
I have no explanation because that's clearly not something you said.
Sorry.