I view these guys with "secret top-level sources" as fun viewing. I don't take it seriously, but it's fun to listen to. If I can get any kind of sauce with it I'll dive into that, but nothing else is actually credible.
That kind of thinking would dismiss most anyone that tries to report. I'm always open to listen. Doesn't mean I agree or accept but help me make a better decision.
No more than anyone else who claims to have "inside information" of a plan that should have no outside comms.
Fed up? Info overload? I know how you feel.
I view these guys with "secret top-level sources" as fun viewing. I don't take it seriously, but it's fun to listen to. If I can get any kind of sauce with it I'll dive into that, but nothing else is actually credible.
Infotainment shouldn't be praised in the anon/research dept.
By that definition it's like public access MSM. Fake news that's occasionally correct... Plus it's fun! /s
Who's to say really? Take the info and see if you can corroborate and expand. That's what Q is all about.
That kind of thinking would dismiss most anyone that tries to report. I'm always open to listen. Doesn't mean I agree or accept but help me make a better decision.
Him and everyone else about the 19th and 20th. Who really knows? Listen and learn. Even the 'enemy' can provide useful intel.