One of the purposes of Swamp Rangers is to define criteria for and create a list of Swamp Creatures. Tim, please consider joining our Gab group.
Primary criterion: unconstitutionality.
How should that manifest for those who deny their charges? Who serves as a sufficient fact-checker for whether someone's actions are unconstitutional? Should it be by a vote of vetted members? Should Swamp Rangers enlist Con Law experts to make the decisions? Should it be more formal or informal?
to be clear, this piece of work being a Romney offspring certainly puts massive suspicion on her in my mind so if she can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to be guilty of atrocities to americans and humanity than she'll have to pay the piper. if she is just a spineless squid that blows with the wind than we need to hope she is soon humbled and removed from any position of significance until she realizes hwo easily her mind can be manipulated
I think that there are far too many folks that are guilty of unconstitutional behavior if we consider it in the strictest terms. most wouldn't know any better though because our constitution has been usurped and corrupted since circa 1871 and we've been living essentially under the UNITED STATES CORP's constitution.
if we make this great awakening a spiteful exercise that seeks to punish those that were either too blind or weren't intelligent enough to process everything, it will fail. while we can hope that those that lost their way will be immensely humbled by the awakening and acknowledge us as intelligent and trustworthy, whether they do or not, the only solution is love for those lost fellow americans as long as they aren't guilty of having committed atrocities. those guilty of atrocities should be handled lawfully, whether that be jail time or by hanging.
we all need to start from a clean slate and not let our egos get the best of us.
Also saw on Gab, there was someone saving Twit screen shots of threats of violence and other illegal statements. Might be working with the Swamp Rangers now.
One of the purposes of Swamp Rangers is to define criteria for and create a list of Swamp Creatures. Tim, please consider joining our Gab group.
Primary criterion: unconstitutionality.
How should that manifest for those who deny their charges? Who serves as a sufficient fact-checker for whether someone's actions are unconstitutional? Should it be by a vote of vetted members? Should Swamp Rangers enlist Con Law experts to make the decisions? Should it be more formal or informal?
to be clear, this piece of work being a Romney offspring certainly puts massive suspicion on her in my mind so if she can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to be guilty of atrocities to americans and humanity than she'll have to pay the piper. if she is just a spineless squid that blows with the wind than we need to hope she is soon humbled and removed from any position of significance until she realizes hwo easily her mind can be manipulated
I think that there are far too many folks that are guilty of unconstitutional behavior if we consider it in the strictest terms. most wouldn't know any better though because our constitution has been usurped and corrupted since circa 1871 and we've been living essentially under the UNITED STATES CORP's constitution.
if we make this great awakening a spiteful exercise that seeks to punish those that were either too blind or weren't intelligent enough to process everything, it will fail. while we can hope that those that lost their way will be immensely humbled by the awakening and acknowledge us as intelligent and trustworthy, whether they do or not, the only solution is love for those lost fellow americans as long as they aren't guilty of having committed atrocities. those guilty of atrocities should be handled lawfully, whether that be jail time or by hanging.
we all need to start from a clean slate and not let our egos get the best of us.
with love and humility
Also saw on Gab, there was someone saving Twit screen shots of threats of violence and other illegal statements. Might be working with the Swamp Rangers now.
so by her standard of allegations being unproven, when a woman cries rape, they have to prove rape before being taken seriously. hmmm....Believe Women