Edit: Provided proof that there's a creator and got downvoted? Shills? What? Lol.
The Axis of Evil is irrefutable scientific proof not only that God exists, but that 'muh aliens' almost certainly don't, big claims to make I know - bear with me.
The first step to finding the Axis began when scientists who were mostly Atheist proved the existence of Cosmic Microwave Background radiation or CMB in 1964, which disproved the steady state theory, which said that there was no beginning whatsoever and that the universe has always existed.
Think of CMB as left-over heat from the Big Bang.
Further CMB Experiments - the first begun in 1988 with the ground-based advanced cosmic microwave explorer (1988-1996), there are 16 on-going, have been 43 finished, 3 cancelled and there are 3 planned experiments. They mainly use ground-based observatories, high altitude balloons and satellites.
In the '90s they found that the universe was flat and largely disproved cosmic strings, which is interesting because it says in Isaiah 34:4 and Revelation 6:14 that God will roll up the heavens like a scroll when he's remaking the universe (this is after Judgement Day).
In 1992, through analysis of data from the Cosmic Background Explorer satellite, they discovered that CMB was anisotropic, rather than isotropic - a big breakthrough for creationist cosmology and the beginning of the end of intellectually-honest atheistic cosmology.
Disheartened by their results, the scientists kept launching satellites with newer and newer technology, hoping to find that the equipment had failed, or that a higher definition 'picture' would finally prove their vaunted isotropic CMB and invalidate the earlier conclusions.
The results came back again and again in higher definition, accumulating until in 2010 the first all-sky map from the Planck satellite was released, and 2013 when a higher definition map was released and the mission ended.
Astrophysicists still puzzled years later:
6 June 2019 - ESA's Planck satellite has found no new evidence for the puzzling cosmic anomalies that appeared in its temperature map of the Universe.
What anomalies puzzled them so? What did they find?
In a way they found God - which is why this is probably the first time you're hearing about any of this.
In higher and higher definition, by seeking to disprove intelligent design the astrophysicists proved it (though a minority such as Hugh Ross were trying to prove it). They proved it by finding something they named The Axis of Evil - which they hated, and continue to hate to this day because of what it proves.
This axis is a preferred line which pervades the entire universe, a line which is drawn from tracing the anisotropic differences in CMB - and get this, the Axis lines up perfectly with the ecliptic of the Earth (the plane that the Earth travels as it orbits the Sun).
This means that no matter where your alien civilization may exist in the universe, in the billions of years life has had to develop anywhere - by the time you reached the technological level we were at in the 90s, you'd have discovered us.
You'd have went to the center of this Axis - this giant Universe-sized arrow, and you'd have found the Earth.
Why does this axis exist, and why does it point here? - given the expanding universe, and the countless proofs for intelligent design (Read the Creator and the Cosmos by Hugh Ross)..The most likely answer is because the Big Bang happened right here, and given all of this evidence, we can claim nigh-irrefutable proof both that there's a Creator, and that they have made an Earth-centered universe.
This has Massive theological and philosophical implications - it means that our planet, and our species is of ultimate importance to God.
You may then ask - why do all those billions of galaxies exist, if they're barren?
The scientific answer, is that without all that extra mass, the laws of physics wouldn't be fine-tuned enough for the countless amount of random things to happen, which were required to happen exactly as they did - so that the Earth and our solar system could be like they are.
For example, if there was >1% more matter, then our light elements wouldn't exist, and if there was >1% less matter, our heavy metals wouldn't exist - everything is just barely perfect right now, and we live in an unbelievably fine-tuned universe.
The religious answer is simple and found in Psalm 19:1-4: The heavens declare the glory of God. Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they reveal knowledge.
Here is an article written by a scientist trying to explain the 'Axis of Evil', you can really get their confused attitude to it - and one of his possible excuses is that the universe is shaped like a doughnut, no - really.
Side note: for whatever reason the word 'anisotropic' is not being recognized as a word, and no issue with 'isotropic'
*Edit: Provided proof that there's a creator and got downvoted?* Shills? What? **Lol.**
**The Axis of Evil** is irrefutable scientific proof not only that God exists, but that '*muh aliens*' almost certainly don't, big claims to make I know - *bear with me.*
The first step to finding the Axis began when scientists who were mostly Atheist [proved the existence](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/62/BigBangNoise.jpg) of Cosmic Microwave Background radiation or CMB in 1964, which disproved the steady state theory, which said that there was no beginning whatsoever and that the universe has always existed.
*Think of CMB as left-over heat from the Big Bang.*
[**Further CMB Experiments**](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cosmic_microwave_background_experiments#:~:text=Some%20notable%20experiments%20in%20the,first%20E%2Dmode%20polarization%20spectrum%3B) - the first begun in 1988 with the ground-based advanced cosmic microwave explorer (1988-1996), there are 16 on-going, have been 43 finished, 3 cancelled and there are 3 planned experiments. They mainly use ground-based observatories, high altitude balloons and satellites.
**In the '90s** they found that the universe was [flat](https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0004404) and largely disproved cosmic strings, which is interesting because it says in Isaiah [34:4](https://biblehub.com/isaiah/34-4.htm) and Revelation [6:14](https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation%206%3A14&version=KJV) that God will roll up the heavens like a scroll when he's remaking the universe (this is after Judgement Day).
**In 1992**, through analysis of data from the Cosmic Background Explorer satellite, they discovered that CMB was anisotropic, rather than isotropic - a big breakthrough for creationist cosmology and the beginning of the end of intellectually-honest atheistic cosmology.
**Disheartened by their results**, the scientists kept launching satellites with newer and newer technology, hoping to find that the equipment had failed, or that a higher definition 'picture' would finally prove their vaunted isotropic CMB and invalidate the earlier conclusions.
The results came back *again and again* in higher definition, accumulating until in 2010 the first all-sky map from the Planck satellite was released, and 2013 when a higher definition map was released and the mission ended.
**Astrophysicists still puzzled years later:**
[6 June 2019](https://sci.esa.int/web/planck/-/61396-planck-finds-no-new-evidence-for-cosmic-anomalies) - ESA's Planck satellite has found no new evidence for the ***puzzling cosmic anomalies that appeared in its temperature map of the Universe.***
What *anomalies* puzzled them so? *What did they find?*
In a way they found *God* - which is why this is probably the *first time you're hearing about any of this.*
*In higher and higher definition, by seeking to disprove intelligent design the astrophysicists proved it* (though a minority such as Hugh Ross were trying to prove it). They proved it by finding something they named [The Axis of Evil](https://i1.wp.com/www.thephysicsmill.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/planck_axis_of_evil.jpg?resize=1024%2C512) - which they hated, and continue to hate to this day because of what it proves.
**This axis is a preferred line which pervades the entire universe**, a line which is drawn from tracing the anisotropic differences in CMB - and get this, the Axis lines up **perfectly** with the ecliptic of the Earth (the plane that the Earth travels as it orbits the Sun).
This means that no matter where your alien civilization may exist in the universe, in the billions of years life has had to develop anywhere - by the time you reached the technological level we were at in the 90s, you'd have discovered us.
You'd have went to the center of this Axis - this giant Universe-sized arrow, and you'd have found the Earth.
**Why does this axis exist, and why does it point here?** - given the expanding universe, and the *countless* proofs for intelligent design (Read the Creator and the Cosmos by Hugh Ross)..The most likely answer is because the Big Bang happened right here, and given all of this evidence, we can claim nigh-irrefutable proof both that there's a Creator, and that they have made an Earth-centered universe.
**This has Massive theological and philosophical implications** - it means that *our planet, and our species is of ultimate importance to God.*
**You may then ask** - *why do all those billions of galaxies exist, if they're barren?*
The scientific answer, is that without all that extra mass, the laws of physics wouldn't be [fine-tuned](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMbEVv3IsGY) enough for the countless amount of random things to happen, which were required to happen exactly as they did - so that the Earth and our solar system could be like they are.
**For example**, if there was >1% more matter, then our light elements wouldn't exist, and if there was >1% less matter, our heavy metals wouldn't exist - everything is just barely perfect right now, and we live in an unbelievably [fine-tuned ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMbEVv3IsGY)universe.
**The religious answer** is simple and found in [Psalm 19:1-4](https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalm%2019%3A1-7&version=NIV): *The heavens declare the glory of God.* Day after day they pour forth speech; **night after night they reveal knowledge.**
Here is an [article ](http://www.thephysicsmill.com/2015/10/31/the-cmb-axis-of-evil-and-the-nature-of-randomness/)written by a scientist trying to explain the 'Axis of Evil', you can really get their confused attitude to it - and one of his possible excuses is that the universe is ***shaped like a doughnut***, no - *really*.
*Side note:* for whatever reason the word 'anisotropic' is not being recognized as a word, and no issue with 'isotropic'
I remember reading years ago, reading about using doppler effect on the universe and that is showed nearly everything in the Universe is red shifted. Basically, everything is moving away from us. The article, was quick to say "Now, don't assume we are the center of the universe.. this may be due to some effect on doppler we are unaware of." But seriously, if this is accurate, then we would be in the center after all.
We used to think the earth was the center of the solar system. Well, turned out to not be true, but us being located in the center of the universe? What are the mathematical chances of that?
If you have an RGB keyboard try setting a custom rainbow effect with only red and blue (red shift/blue shift) you will notice that when the red wave starts it looks as if red lit keys are raised higher than blue lit keys.
Just an observation.
Everything is moving away from everything else, so everywhere looks like the center, like a random dot on the two-dimensional surface of an expanding balloon, indistinguishable from any other dot (not counting the mouth of the balloon of course).
What's important is that the discoverers of the recession expected random movement instead (both red and blue shifts equally). Unexpected universal recession indicates inflation, which indicates past finite origin, which indicates (as Big Bang theory states) the universe beginning within some medium in which the laws of physics were other than what we know in the origin Planck time, or (as theology states) supernatural creation by God.
The expanding universe doesn't disprove Axis of Evil whatsoever.
That's a good explanation.
Amen!!!!!!!!
The more I learn about science, the more it confirms that our Universe was intelligently designed by a creator.
Look at the intricacies in the human eye. In how blood clotting works to keep us from dying. Math, physics, etc. All of it points to an intelligent creator.
Then, you get to The Gospels which have been analyzed by people and they line up with accurate witness testimony. The fact that two people will tell the same story and they emphasize different things, but their accounts back the other one up is a sign of truthful witness testimony. Lee Strobel has talked about it. He was an atheist and became a Christian by trying to disprove God in case anyone reading this doesn't know who he is.
God is real. Jesus is real. True freedom is only found in Christ. For anyone reading this and questioning things, God promises answers.
Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives, and the one who seeks finds, and to the one who knocks it will be opened. -Matthew7:7-8
I've never heard of this before, but it is compelling.
I still have my own theories on aliens though. I believe they do exist and have been allowed to advance before us so that they would come to know Jesus. This phenomena you describe lends credence to my theory because it means they would have a road map to this exact location, and as such not miss out on divine revelation.
Additionally, I don't think aliens have ever personally stepped foot on this planet. More than likely, they use sophisticated androids/surrogates much like we use drones. Why ship yourself light-years away from home when you can send a robot and hook into it with a VR headset?
I'm not convinced we can exceed the speed of light, so my wager is they have developed a way to entangle particles such they can synchronize two devices that house two paired particles. The devices can be separated but the particles they house have identical movements relative to their housing device. If you move one particle 1cm to the right, the other will simultaneously move 1cm to the right as well, relative to their respective housings.
Monitoring the particles, you can solve the issue with transmission delay and receive real-time signals from two locations in space, all without breaking the speed of light (assuming information can exceed the speed of light). Ship one to the other end of the universe, and you can immediately send a message without having to wait for the signal to travel the distance. It takes an investment setting up the relay station, but once it is established you can entangle more particles and spread out much like our intranet infrastructures.
Has there been a quantum entanglement experiment with 1 end of the experiment on earth and 1 on the moon or further out would prove or disprove that.
Be interesting to see - if it is possible (I'm leaning towards not, but who know?), then in 100 years when the military declassify it our descendants can have 0-ping gaming. Lol.
Don’t know if you guys have heard this already, but it’s both terrifying and uplifting at the same time. This interview is from December 2019. The guy being interviewed is either crazy or telling the truth, but one thing is clear, he 100% believes what he’s saying and it doesn’t sounds like he’s making it up as he goes. He’s clearly very intelligent. Anyway, it’s pretty long, but it will blow your mind.
http://qanon.video/q-videos/their-final-attempt-to-control-the-world/
Listen to this song (the sound of silence, Simon and Garfunkel) and look into project bluebeam.
BB goes with the 5G thing Johnheretohelp is talking about, supposedly the first artificial thought happened (where you use the same wavelength which thoughts happen at) in a USSR lab in the 70s. Crazy, but technologically plausible.
NWO has 6 main plans, but I think Trump and Q know them all.
Scientists agree that the universe started with a big bang. What stumps them is how all the matter and energy of the universe came into being and exactly what crammed it into the space of a marble before it exploded.
Philosophers throughout history agree that anything with a beginning must have a first cause. The first cause for the beginning of the universe is what we call God.
It has been billions of years since the big bang. If the big bang had been slightly more forceful, then in the billions of years that have passed, everything would have expanded to the point that no particle would be in sight of another particle. There would be no planets, stars, or galaxies.
On the other hand, if the big bang had been slightly less forceful, then by the present time, gravity would have slowed everything down, and everything would have returned to the center. We would just have a big hot mess, and again, no planets, stars, or galaxies.
Knowing the correct amount of force at the beginning shows that God is a great mind.
There's a lot more to this. Read Lee Strobel's books.
Maybe it's not a coincidence that people say that the same as the theme song of the big bang theory? - "It all started with the big bang!"
Maybe it is a coincidence, I don't know.
Everyone MUST watch Kent Hovind's Creation Seminar Series. It's crazy long but absolutely exhaustive in concluding a Creator and refuting every aspect of evolution.
You left out some important information.
Firmament In biblical cosmology, the firmament is the vast solid dome created by God on the second day to divide the primal sea into upper and lower portions so that the dry land could appear.
SOLID DOME! Snow Globe.
EDIT: Space is fake and gay.
Guarantee we're interpreting that scripture differently - firmament makes just as much sense to be translated 'atmosphere'.
Anyway I don't want to get into a flat earth debate.
I don't believe it, but my friend and his family believe it, and are nice about it so I respect it...but this post is about mainstream cosmology.
Do the cited research and make a FE post on conspiracies.win like I did here - I doubt most GA.win users are receptive to debating or discussing it.
Have other things to do with my time so won't bother replying to more FE comments, sorry. God bless.
Operation Fish Bowl https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VhJhg0LH38
Have you been to space to prove it is real?
Sources? I feel like your theory here is very disjointed and skips critical discoveries that would lead to the next one. Not to mention it sounds like there are many assumptions in play here considering the little amount of detail you have provided. This story of this supposed discovery should be able to be described much smoother and with way more detail than you are giving.
I listed every major discovery that led to the Axis of evil, showed how dozens of experiments have been carried out showing the same thing. What critical discoveries? Doughnut-shaped universe? - Nonsense.
Big bang theory is one of the most well-founded theories in science, and it's largely based on cosmology; CMB is the most well-founded theories in cosmology and everything points towards the 'Axis of Evil' being legit.
I've re-read Hugh Rosses book which talks about this multiple times and have known about it for years, tell me what critical discoveries do you think are going to discredit the research? - The entirety of existence points here.
Your opinion of, or desire to believe the facts do not change the facts.
Check my hyperlinks, I included sources, listed the primary book for research and video-explanations that most people can understand about the linked topics.
Hawking would've given donut shape some consideration (though sphere is a bit likelier). In another application (in re light cones), he said the universe is pear-shaped. I disagree and say chocolate-chip-shaped.
I appreciate your sources. Interestingly, the last one argues against this axis, holding that it's likely a phenomenon that would appear to refer back to your own location wherever you are in the universe. Haven't heard about it before and it might or might not exist, but CMB certainly holds clues about our makeup that must be read aright.
Hugh Ross is often brilliant and occasionally erratic. The best answer is that all scientific discovery either (1) fits supernatural creation or (2) results in still-debated paradoxes that, when resolved, will also fit. The estimates of the universe being 15 billion years old by expansion data but the stars in it being 20 billion years old by star formation data is an open question, for instance. When it gets solved, possibly by questioning the foundational assumptions about time, space, and light, it will accord precisely with the rest of creation. The fact that creation is orderly and that we didn't order it ourselves suggests Someone else did. Make sure and get His identity right.
Doughnut and pear and whatever other shaped universes are really obvious examples of 'wishful thinking' secular scientists are known for. It's appropriate Hawking said it was 'pear-shaped', given its metaphorical meaning.
15-20 billion isn't a big discrepancy in cosmology, and my post is about CMB anyway - which has no such discrepancy and in fact it proves the big bang theory Very well.
I included the last source because it is so ridiculous, shows the obvious bias in cosmology against creationism and just because it had the axis of evil picture.
'His identity' - You're talking about God, right?
You can argue science literally ad nauseam if you want to - but a simple application of occam's razor reveals the truth, especially for this issue. Belief in the bible and in God doesn't require people to be smart or stupid, but humble - that is the defining characteristic.
Why does this matter? As a non-believer, I guess I don't see the need to know.
And if a person subscribes to the idea that we can frame our beliefs how we'd like to.
Well, they still have a lot more living and growing to do.
Existentially, it matters because if Christianity is true then you can find ultimate happiness (and eternal life) through a relationship with God. And don't give me that 'but there are bad Christians' argument - we know the churches are corrupted, I'm talking about God.
Philosophically, it matters because it's the reason everything exists in the first place. Have you never wondered why you came to be? If there might be a God? If said God might know and love you?
From a scientific perspective it matters because many scientists are ideological atheists and not following the scientific method correctly (without bias), we're wasting money and opportunities for research.
If more people knew this then we wouldn't have gotten as close to the NWO controlling everything as they did.
Philsiophically, I disagree with bible god. Like giving a loaded gun to a toddler - I'd never give free will to someone I know was incapable of using it safely and responsibly... Eternally damaging themselves and/or others in the process. We don't put people in the captain seat of airplanes that can't fly... But for some reason, we've unexplicably determined that giving free will to someone who will just fuck themselves over with it, is good.
It disagree completely.
It's just not loving or responsible at all.... Philisophically speaking, of course.
So, if it's God you're looking for. You may want to reconsider... He's not very kind.
I'd rather have my free will, thanks.
Eternally damaging doesn't exist - God can heal emotional damage Very quickly when people pray for help.
It's the exact same as a loving parent who lets their children fuck up so they will learn long-term that the parent's way should be followed - people are inherently rebellious to authority.
Humble yourself before God. If you don't do that no amount of evidence will convince you. It's not up to me to convince you, you need to use critical thinking like with Q and figure things out for yourself.
Your beliefs are a product of a myriad of variables... Will, or desire to believe a certain thing is one of the smaller contributors.
Like I said, you still have a lot of growing to do if you think beliefs are simply a product of will or desire.
It's another reason why bible God isn't kind... This is an elementary concept and it even seems to evade "all-knowing" him.
We're products... All of us... We're products of circumstance and experiences that influence our thinking and beliefs. We all believe things we don't want to... Because we have to. Reality does that to us.
Read the beatitudes and then say that to me again.
God has thought of every possible variable you could think of if you lived a thousand years, just because you do not know of the scripture where this is discussed, does not mean it hasn't been discussed.
Lack of knowledge of an aspect or teaching of God does not mean that aspect or teaching does not exist.
Obviously circumstance is taken into consideration when judging people, read the beatitudes - this is explained (they're very short, couple of pages).
God is smarter than you.
God knows more than you.
God knows how to manage a universe better than you.
God is more ethical and better than you.
Humbling yourself before God is the beginning of wisdom.
Rubbing it in because you came straight out with ignorance and blasphemy. Do you think the Lord wants you to believe lies? For you to think he doesn't love you? Nonsense. God is good and deserves your respect. He wants you to be happy and kind.
Hi, I was just in Oklahoma so hope all is well there. You've defined free will interestingly, in such a way as to make it obviously repugnant. I would agree that that kind of "free will" would be reprehensible if you would agree that there may be some other type of "free will" that is intellectually defensible, honorable, and "kind". If you don't see the need to know, you cannot frame your beliefs as you would desire, and reality makes us "have to" do things we don't desire, then what are love, kindness, and responsibility at all? If everything is equally forced and no free will and responsibility exists, what makes one being or action more kind or loving than another? If someone believes in one of these strawman gods as you describe, patient theologians say to that person, "your god is too small". Is it possible that there does exist a greater arbiter of these moral standards than we ourselves? If the only beings able to judge what is right are we fallible folk and the imaginary, impotent deities we are accused of constructing, why do we believe in right at all? (Edit: originally said, less clearly, "impotent deities we construct".)
Do you know what omniscient means?
It means God is all-knowing, that he knows every single factor and circumstance that goes into every single decision ever made by every human mind of every human who has ever lived, is alive today or will live.
That means he can judge people literally better than any person or conceivable power or device ever could. Off your own moral code and soul he will judge you, and there is no fooling God - he knows ever thought you've ever had.
Without God, humans think themselves gods in their own right - that we decide what is right, but that is plainly wrong.
Not believing in God doesn't make you intelligent, and believing in God doesn't make me intelligent, but wise.
Humbling yourself before God is the beginning of wisdom. Would you rather be wise by admitting your weaknesses (limited IQ compared to omniscient creator, for example), or think yourself wise - that you could possibly have better knowledge of morality or what God should do, than God himself?
Hubris, arrogance and secularism are arguably the primary reasons for moral decay - and moral decay is what causes societal decay. Without morality civilizations collapse.
Know that you are not wiser, nor more intelligent, nor better well-read than God - nobody is. Consider your intellect that of a worm in comparison.
Sure, anything's possible, however, that's just moving the goal posts... My concept is simple... If you love someone, you don't hand them something that will fuck them up if you know it will. What are friends for if they're not looking out for you? But this deity? Combine that with the fallacy that our beliefs are completely ours alone and yet somehow judgement is passed down on this one attribute alone....
Well, it's all just a little under-thought out.
First please read my comment above, I wrote the below as a 'follow-up' to give you and whoever reads these the best opportunity to understand - if that is your goal.
I agree that the theology is under-thought out completely - it doesn't explain how God justly judges. That's part of where theology fails - largely a result of human incompetence and actions of the deep church.
Now, consider how ridiculous an idea that a benevolent God who knows every fact in existence could ever possibly judge people unjustly.
You could spend a week studying the relevant scripture and come to a good understanding of it - or just accept the fact that failable humans wrote in the bible.
There are direct quotes from God and Jesus which I trust 100%, but also some theology which doesn't stand up to strict scrutiny 2,000 years later - it was good for teaching then, but arguments can be made and words twisted.
Also luciferan lies + taking out of context. For example someone wrote that all 'sodomists' were going to the lake of fire in Leviticus - why? Because the only sodomites back then were married to women, and cheated on their wives to sleep with men. Monogamous 'gay' people as there is now did not exist.
You can spend a lifetime arguing the theology. Waste of time. Highlight what God and Jesus has said - 10,000's of words at a minimum (might be 100,000s I was guessing) and not one error. (outside of human error - interpretations).
The bible is a collection of dozens of books, not all are equal. Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are more valuable than every other book put together. Dozens of witnesses to events which took place. Biggest 'drop' regarding God's messages to mankind ever and contains more than enough teachings to last you a lifetime - the more humble you are the more you understand.
Humility is the 'password' to understanding the teachings of God - he had them recorded in such a way that arrogance and disbelief comes easy, but humble people will see wisdom and come to the truth.
Maybe I didn't move any goalposts because I didn't plant them in a faulty location to start with, maybe that was somebody else in your life. If someone teaches you a fallacious deity, reject the teaching while still loving the person. As the OP said, the text of the Bible was fully thought-out as written, even though people have built contradictory theologies from it claiming to be faithful.
I believe in a God who is so wise He knows how to give free will as a good gift that does not ruin the people he created it for. I have thought out the consequences of this God, such as that provision must be made for those who reject Him and His gift, and that the determinism you describe must also be reconciled. I can share the winsome, merciful logic of such a God, for those interested.
This forum rests squarely on principles such as the fact that certain sexual deviancies are moral crimes and that it is just and right to punish them by due process of law. This necessitates a transcendent, Absolute Law by which it can be determined what constitutes crime worthy of punishment, and this Absolute must be more unimpeachable and supreme than our Constitution. Otherwise we have no standard for judging what true Love is. So if you believe in Love, believe that it is powerful enough not to abandon you or anyone who seeks to befriend it, but that it also knows how to judge justly. I believe that this kind of Love is also a Person you can get to know better.