Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

31
posted 5 years ago by v8power 5 years ago by v8power +31 / -0
33 comments share
33 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– RageBringer 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Pima County IP with deletions checked out as PIMA County AZ

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– RageBringer 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

I've seen how the algorithm works with the raw data. Nothing is actually ever reported correctly on or time. There are BUCKETS of votes that are held and released on a given ratio. If too many votes are bucketed they can be switched over to another candidate, or outright deleted. REMOVE Trump votes, simply means Trump did not get credit for that amount of votes over the coming releases.

Imagine 10 precincts that provide 10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1 vote for Trump. If they went in some type of chronological order over 10 updates, you would see Trump would get 10 votes, then the 10th precinct would be out of votes for Trump, so the 2nd update would be 9 votes, then the 9th and 10th would be out and so on. So Trump would end up with 55 votes under this formula after the 10th update.

Well, like I said, there is no chronological order to things. The same precincts are not always included in a batch update, could be quite variable.

In a system with cheating voting machines however, let's say there were 100 total votes, if the above system were true, Trump would have gained 55 votes, leaving Biden 45.

Instead of 10 updates, lets make it only 5.

Trump would have a true update in that case of 19, 15, 11, 7, 3 = 55 votes over 5 updates, same end total right?

Lets cheat for Biden without anyone knowing.

Trump being cheated, over 5 updates; 15, 10, 10, 7, 3 = 45 votes for Trump, 10 votes in the IDLE bucket

Biden gains the IDLE bucket votes (+ or -), 9, 9, 9, 9, 9 = 45 votes for Biden, then adjust for +10 from the IDLE bucket = 14, 13, 11, 9, 8 = 55 votes Biden+Bucket

If you want Trump to be even lower, then take 3 more from him and give them to 3rd party if it ever got too close.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– RageBringer 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

THIS IS HELLA LONG REPLY...

It took weeks for us to figure it all out, but there is this massive deep cheating AI/algorithm.

Basically, they pick a final percentage of what they want for a states totals. Say 51% Biden, 48% Trump, 1% 3rd party. They use past voting data and polling expectation to guess the 2020 turnout. So all they have to do is tell the cheating program, the "expected turnout statewide" and the "final %'s they desire". The program does the rest, by the following.

  1. The cheating program knows all the precincts and it is aware of the number of registered voters in each of those. So if the STATE has a 65% turnout, then the cheating program knows how many voters from each precinct it will need to manipulate in order to obtain that final desired percentage.

  2. The cheating cannot be constant, it has to "move around" to hide itself or it would be too easy to find. You cant just say, ok have all the precincts report 51% for Biden, too obvious. So what you do is, you DON'T CHEAT AT ALL, until around 20% of the vote is in, once you have the REAL RESULTS of 20% of your expected total vote, you will get a very accurate trend that you can then use prior voting history per precinct to make an educated guess on what the final numbers WOULD be if left unchanged.

  3. So, you want Biden to get 51% and Trump 48% and 1% others. The first 20% of the ACTUAL REAL results has Trump at 70%, Biden 25% and others at 5%.

So what needs to happen to get Trump DOWN from 70% to 48%, and Biden UP from 25% to 51% and other from 5% to 1%? MATH needs to happen, and it needs to be sneaky.

So basically, the cheaters now have the following information: a) Past vote totals b) polling enthusiasm c) 2020 expected turnout down to the precinct level based on secret polling not publicly released. d) REAL election results from the first 20% returns. e) The DESIRED FINAL OUTCOME

Now, if you have 10 precincts in a state, (this is all lowballed to make it easier to understand), 5 of them vote REP, and 5 DEM. However the 5 REP precincts go harder on REP and the 5 DEM are weaker. Meaning the average REP are 80% TRUMP, while the DEM are only 60% BIDEN.

To keep it believable, you cannot simply modifiy all these with the same ratios because a school that votes 2,000 people with average over the past 20 years having only 400 of them vote Democrat, if that school votes 2,000 people and all a sudden 1500 of them went Democrat, you'd have an ANTRIM MICHIGAN on your hands and people would notice and call it out.

So this cheating program has to know more information and it does!

  1. It knows down to the precinct level how the votes go to each party by %. Having that knowledge, you can now safely alter votes from that county but still keep it believable and in range that falls into the margins.

Same example, the school that 2,000 usually vote at, but there are 4,000 people registered there to vote. The average turnout is around 50%. Well, there is some overhead, if more votes are needed, you could ADD up to 2,000 more voters, but that would give a 100% turnout and red flags.

However, due to this historical voting, mail in ballots the number of participants should be much higher according to fake news. So if they had 3,000 people show up, they could still justify it. So what would reasonable numbers be in one of the harder going REP precincts that are 80% REP with 2,000 voters? How about we add 800 more votes and give them all to Biden. 2,800 turnout 70%, and instead of 400 votes to Biden and 2,000 to Trump, Biden gets the extra 800 and is now sitting at 1200 votes but that is still too much for Trump, so lets delete 500 of his votes. So now you have 2,300 votes coming out of the precinct, 1,200 Biden and 1,500 Trump. Looks good, do it. If the cheating software is tied into the ballot marking devices, then what happens is when a person votes for Trump they can either QR code it to discard that vote, or change the QR code to be for Biden, although the circle will be marked Trump, or the text says Trump.

Only the QR code matters, because when you walk your ballot over to be scanned, the machine eats it and scans the QR code. It will award a ballot to Biden or Trump or other, or just not count it at all... no matter what the TEXT says on the ballot. As a voter you do NOT get feedback at this station, you only get a signal that your vote was counted or it had an error and needs attention. (over/undervote/straymark etc).

So we changed a few things, but we need to balance it out or we risk getting caught. So the physical number of ballots cannot be hacked, except that they can. The Dominion Imagecast has the ability to PRINT ballots. So if you added ballots for Biden and removed ballots for Trump and the numbers did not balance, you could have the imagecast PRINT a follow up ballot, after a voter scans theirs to account for the difference. We added 800 ballots to Biden and deleted 500 Trump votes. So the variable is 300, we need 300 more ballots that are for Biden, so the Imagecast then scans ballots as they are inserted and then it can simply scan/dump the ballot into the locked ballot box and then print a follow up 300 times until that magic number is hit. Now the precinct will balance.

So, yeah that was complicated sorry. That is 1 precinct. EVERY precinct is manipulated. The precincts are only manipulated for about an hour/90 minutes then released and allowed to go back to reporting the real results.

WHY DID IT FAIL?

REDWAVE MASSIVE TURNOUT.

Remember they estimated turnout, they even boosted turnout at the precinct level to give those extra votes to Biden. Well, they allowed the first 20% of results to come in, they took that and extrapolated the percentages against expectations and history. SO what happens when your margin is 48%-51%, but then 10% more people per precinct actually show up to vote and they are almost ALL FOR TRUMP? The computers get fucked up, they cannot balance it. Their numbers are based on X, but they are seeing XX numbers, too many votes to overcome, SHUT IT DOWN BEFORE THEY ALL REPORT 100% and that is what they did. Placed shutdown at 97-99% and sat there for hours while tons of FAKE PRINTED BALLOTS were hand scanned in, blank ballots, Ruby Freeman ballots, TCF Detroit ballots, Philly ballots, Milwaukie ballots, MASSIVE ADJUDICATION to steal Trump votes and give to Biden... they did it all.

Now, why would a true audit where the ballots are READ by the text and not QR code scanned fuck it all up and blow the lid off?

Because remember those 800 ballots we gave Biden? 500 of them will say TRUMP and 300 of them won't have a voter assigned to the barcode. Then, if they did the scan multiple ballots, blank ballots, then their books will be WAY off, exactly like Detroit was 73% off balance pollbooks.

What would happen in our precinct scenario, is the 1,200 Biden ballots and the 1,500 Trump ballots, would actually on PAPER by hand/eye human reading the ballot and marking down a count, you would end up with:

Trump, 1,500 that were counted. 500 ballots that were deleted with a QR code that stated "do not count/discard", and you would end up at 2,000 Trump votes. This be 500 more than he was given credit for... next,

Biden would end up with 400 votes that matched a pollbook, and 800 votes that were not assigned to a voter. Biden would then only be awarded 400 votes that were matched to people who showed up. There would be 800 ballots in the box that SAY Joe Biden but no people to match them against. The fraud would be obvious.

THAT IS WHY MARICOPA COUNTY AZ, WAYNE COUNTY MI, FULTON COUNTY GA, PHILADEPHIA COUNTY PA, and others WILL NOT ALLOW ANYONE TO ACCESS THE PAPER BALLOTS! Only need 1 of these counties to fall, then all of them will fall...

The kicker on this? This happened in all 50 states. Senators were altered, House members altered and the POTUS was altered. Some benefited GOP and some DEM. Whoever is in charge of elections, likes to keep things close for a reason... to make it believable.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy