Why do they continue to refer to it as a coup? The coup was the election fraud in my mind and the military take over was the responsibility of the military to defeat the coup. If we are to use Myanmar as a template, then a military remedy here would be labeled the same...a coup.
Why do they continue to refer to it as a coup? The coup was the election fraud in my mind and the military take over was the responsibility of the military to defeat the coup. If we are to use Myanmar as a template, then a military remedy here would be labeled the same...a coup.
I think really it’s just using the general term of quickly and physically taking control, regardless of the merits.