for the sanctimony shills, uh, I mean free-speech purists, to also study and discuss Q and related issues.
And then can we start a betting pool on just how fast it burns to the ground?
I know this might be some extra work, but it’ll be both educational and hilarious.
I’ll kick in the $30 to register the URL (and hey, no front-running domain poachers on greatawakeningmuhfreespeechedition.win now folks!)
Banning a word seems extreme and a big shift compared to deporting for trolls/bots/spam/communist propagandists/violence provocateurs. It’s suspicious happening here to say the least. It’s a hallmark of the leftists I’m sure you considered this before the post.
Edit:
Great post https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRCJ85pI/x/c/4Dx42BbHvcm
The funny thing is, the word was already banned, as per the "Civil Discussion ONLY" rule on the sidebar. There was no reason for a thread to be made warning people that they're not allowed to use the N-word here, directing it at all users with an accusatory and threatening tone despite acknowledging that the word is primarily if not entirely being used by shills.
Now, actual users expressing concern regarding this oddly specific warning and wondering if it's the beginning of a slippery slope (e.g. if you say anything negative about the Rothschilds or George Soros it's antisemitism), are being straw-manned as racists and shills. Few if any are advocating for being allowed to use the N-word, as they were not previously using the word anyway.
To reiterate my point from the other thread, it would've been far better for the mods to make a post informing us about the uptick in shill activity and that they're currently trying to make us look bad by using the N-word, so we should report anyone we see doing that. Instead, we got phrases like "I shouldn't have to say this," and "Stop it, or else," as if everyone here were suddenly spouting racist slurs.
?
You maybe should be aware that I had already bet the existence of my account here on the fact that I believe deleting an account based on a word without looking at context and intent is a bad, bad, very ill-considered idea.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRCJ85pI/x/c/4Dx42BbHvcm
We can and should debate what’s constructive and what’s destructive here, but to compare this community to a content-agnostic platform and demand “free speech”, here, is beyond retarded.
Thanks great post
I think words are a solid line, ya.
I disagree with it but I hardly post the word anyways.
Touché!
So how are the reporting tools for admins on this site? It’d be hi-larious to see how many times the “muh free speeches” gang has slapped the Deport button.