1918-1920 Spanish flu killed estimated 50 million In a world population of 1.8 billion Makes it a .027% killer
In a time when there were no efficient international travel except by boat.
Zero draconian measures
COVID has killed 2,440,000 In a world population is 7,800,000,000 Makes it a .0003% of the population killer
Even though we have international travel exponentially higher than in 1920 COVID kills at .01% of the Spanish flu per capita yet we destroyed our way of life , our economy, our kids future
Here's the deeper thought. We are to believe that the whitehats have a rather large amount of control of events, right? I do anyway. So that means there's a pretty fair chance that they are responsible for or at least approve of the lockdowns, right? Why? To prep the world for a massive change? Are we just switching financial systems or is there something more sinister at play? Are we in a danger too grave to tell the public or they will panic? What really is the difference between a global Q movement lead by the US army and a global great reset? Create crisis, apply solution sure fits the globalist playbook. The great reset was too obvious, imo.
Anyway I'll stop rambling.
I have thought this too, but the plan is an awful lot of trouble to go to in order to control people. The great reset would do the job fine, the black hats have or had a lot of control. They don't mind if a few people recognize what they are doing, in fact, they rather like it.
I'm sure there are real factions out there and I hope the winners want a free world.
It is after all, the smarter way, The cabal ruling by coercion would always have to watch their back.
I agree with commenters here that the evil people around are less smart than the good ones. They go for more immediate return over longer term success.
The whole idea of dominance and subterfuge is less stable than cooperation.
Am I kidding myself?
Also, The Plan faction seem to favor more devolved power (multipolar world vs globalization) and less centralization and monopoly which means less structural opportunity for dominance and more opportunity for local resilience.