--When your first sentence of a response is a query, you are stipulating a position of relative ignorance.
"But it sounds like..."
--Those four words, I have noticed, almost always preface a statement which will be wrong. Their writer hopes they will be correct (in order to feel the dopomine-rush of vindication), but reality is cruel.
"you might be confusing free speech with there being rules in place...."
Wrong (as predicted). I recognize that the latter are a necessary restriction of the former.
Trying to sound witty, lol. Your response is actually pretty stupid - shows you lack of comprehension.
I asked what /b/ was because I don’t know what the fuck it means, nothing more. If you didn’t want to answer the question - a better response might be something like: ‘look up it yourself’. That would have made much better sense than “When your first sentence of a response is a query, you are stipulating a position of relative ignorance.” You don’t know what ignorance means, do you, lol. Since questions are a form of a query - this must be your default jackass response to anyone asking a question, right lol.
Had you not responded, no one would be the wiser. But you literally did not come back with an answer to my question that made sense, let alone a valid argument to explain why my assumption is not correct. You do know what this type of response is indicative of, right? Resulting to name calling, insults and redirection... Childish.
Answer for it?! Shiiiiiit, all that info was probably handed over to them. Seems to me it might've been a hit job to force the creator/CEO out of involvement
If this stinking logo doesn't show the members on this forum how divisive we have allowed the left to make even those who come together on a forum of like ideas, I don't know what will ever wake us up.
This is about the fourth post I've seen against Parler, and each one of them contains lies. You MUST produce a DL. Half-truth. You take a pic of your DL if you want to be verified. Trust me. They get so far behind unless you're someone everyone knows, no one will know who you are. Just don't worry about it.
Parler censors. No they do not. I was on Parler from the start. There were so many Q followers who posted anything they wanted. So long as you don't promote violence or share pics that are porn (and many did from Biden's laptop and had to be reminded that it was criminal even to have porn pictures of children, etc., on their computer much less share them), there was no censorship.
John Matze was wrongly fired. Uh-no. He should have been let go as soon as the owners asked him about the lack of wisdom of partnering with Amazon Web Services and he did nothing to secure the platform. The owners should take responsibility for not stepping in, but Matze then went public and lied about the censorship--saying the owners wanted censorship. He was all for free speech. He changed his story the next day. Bongino's big mistake was going after Matze on his program and giving Matze ammunition to assure that the owners take a good percentage of the negligence if they attempt to sue him for damages. Not a good move on Bongino's part, but what's done is done.
The logo is an owl, but in fact, as proven by this post, the logo wss a false one. I see no problem with either. It's a stinking logo for goodness sakes. Not everything in life is evil, though we are driving ourselves insane looking for evil in every corner, and if we're not careful, we will not be able to pull people out of the madness that this search is causing. Yes, bad things are happening, but it is very harmful to simply seek evil without also exposing some good. And Parler's logo is a very prime example of what's really going to take this world down if we don't wake up and stop fighting even among the very people we say we agree with.
Parler censors free speech. Dead on arrival. We will all leave.
eg. try posting Biden was a pedo or Michelle is a man. See what happens.
Sure do! Someone posted a ban screenshot earlier...
"Parler censors free speech."
-- Have you looked at the rules for this place? They're a couple inches ---> that way.
No place, except maybe /b/, permits you to be a complete and total arsehole.
What’s /b/?
But it sounds like you might be confusing free speech with there being rules in place (ie no racial slurs)...
"What’s /b/?"
--When your first sentence of a response is a query, you are stipulating a position of relative ignorance.
"But it sounds like..."
--Those four words, I have noticed, almost always preface a statement which will be wrong. Their writer hopes they will be correct (in order to feel the dopomine-rush of vindication), but reality is cruel.
"you might be confusing free speech with there being rules in place...."
Wrong (as predicted). I recognize that the latter are a necessary restriction of the former.
Trying to sound witty, lol. Your response is actually pretty stupid - shows you lack of comprehension.
I asked what /b/ was because I don’t know what the fuck it means, nothing more. If you didn’t want to answer the question - a better response might be something like: ‘look up it yourself’. That would have made much better sense than “When your first sentence of a response is a query, you are stipulating a position of relative ignorance.” You don’t know what ignorance means, do you, lol. Since questions are a form of a query - this must be your default jackass response to anyone asking a question, right lol.
Had you not responded, no one would be the wiser. But you literally did not come back with an answer to my question that made sense, let alone a valid argument to explain why my assumption is not correct. You do know what this type of response is indicative of, right? Resulting to name calling, insults and redirection... Childish.
Maybe because all of Parler's data wound up in the hands of democrat activists and they still haven't managed to answer for it?
Answer for it?! Shiiiiiit, all that info was probably handed over to them. Seems to me it might've been a hit job to force the creator/CEO out of involvement
Either Amazon gave the data over directly and Parler said nothing or Parler did it themselves. The hack story is as likely as Biden not cheating
Oh wow, look at the Gab-hating shills simply come out of the woodwork today!
It reminds me of the aliens/demonic dancers at the super bowl.
The middle looks like the monument they have in astana khazakstan
Looks like a flower to me.
He said it looked like a menstrual pad company logo, I agree
If this stinking logo doesn't show the members on this forum how divisive we have allowed the left to make even those who come together on a forum of like ideas, I don't know what will ever wake us up.
This is about the fourth post I've seen against Parler, and each one of them contains lies. You MUST produce a DL. Half-truth. You take a pic of your DL if you want to be verified. Trust me. They get so far behind unless you're someone everyone knows, no one will know who you are. Just don't worry about it.
Parler censors. No they do not. I was on Parler from the start. There were so many Q followers who posted anything they wanted. So long as you don't promote violence or share pics that are porn (and many did from Biden's laptop and had to be reminded that it was criminal even to have porn pictures of children, etc., on their computer much less share them), there was no censorship.
John Matze was wrongly fired. Uh-no. He should have been let go as soon as the owners asked him about the lack of wisdom of partnering with Amazon Web Services and he did nothing to secure the platform. The owners should take responsibility for not stepping in, but Matze then went public and lied about the censorship--saying the owners wanted censorship. He was all for free speech. He changed his story the next day. Bongino's big mistake was going after Matze on his program and giving Matze ammunition to assure that the owners take a good percentage of the negligence if they attempt to sue him for damages. Not a good move on Bongino's part, but what's done is done.
The logo is an owl, but in fact, as proven by this post, the logo wss a false one. I see no problem with either. It's a stinking logo for goodness sakes. Not everything in life is evil, though we are driving ourselves insane looking for evil in every corner, and if we're not careful, we will not be able to pull people out of the madness that this search is causing. Yes, bad things are happening, but it is very harmful to simply seek evil without also exposing some good. And Parler's logo is a very prime example of what's really going to take this world down if we don't wake up and stop fighting even among the very people we say we agree with.
Much better with out those dot! There were freaking me out earlier! Lol. https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRUy7usw/alert-alert-new-parler-logo-is-a/
Looks like the side flaps are folded over center. What would look like opened?
You can go ahead and drown with the world, shill.