This meme sounds nice but Q supporters must be careful not to get caught up in rejecting the term "anti-racist". The forum rule is "no racism" and it rejects race labeling. Therefore being "anti-racist" is a good thing, and should not be redefined as "anti-white", which is of course "racist". (Calling things by their opposites is a hallmark of Newspeak that was deprecated by Isaiah: Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!)
We don't need an ADL for Caucasians and this is not the way to fight. Whatever facts this meme contains must be combatted by training the mixed multitude in the unifying polity of Yahweh. America is proud of being a melting pot because liberty unites and allows us to agree on essentials and to promote diversity in nonessentials and charity in all. We saw this unity among diversity in the Tea Party and the Ron Paul Revolution; we did not see the coded speech and redefinition described here.
Please do not fall for factors that forum-shift anonymous effort away from the Q movement and into ineffective tangential matters.
Please help me understand. We are all against racism. May we use the word "anti-racist" to describe that without it being redefined as "anti-white"? Anti-whites are racist by definition. If you prefer "color-blind", that's fine, but I don't know that people like that word either.
What is the best word for being against racism that does not get one's position being confused with a racist position? You see the quandary.
Okay, thanks, I am happy to proceed on the truth of Yahweh, in love.
Yes, my statement is a quick overgeneralization meant to assist in unity. More accurately, the forum policy is "follow the law"; "they want you labeled by race" with "they" meaning "the true target"; and "no racism", a reporting rule. To be pedantic (again, meaning to assist), that means the forum is against racism and members that are not are subject to penalty.
So am I wrong to object to the idea that "anti-racist" should be redefined as "anti-white", or that "anti-white" is in fact a racist description? The fact that allegations of racism are typically not themselves made color-blindly is so glaringly obvious that it doesn't need these additional distortions to get people to see it. If I'm missing something obvious, I'd like to know!
This meme sounds nice but Q supporters must be careful not to get caught up in rejecting the term "anti-racist". The forum rule is "no racism" and it rejects race labeling. Therefore being "anti-racist" is a good thing, and should not be redefined as "anti-white", which is of course "racist". (Calling things by their opposites is a hallmark of Newspeak that was deprecated by Isaiah: Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!)
We don't need an ADL for Caucasians and this is not the way to fight. Whatever facts this meme contains must be combatted by training the mixed multitude in the unifying polity of Yahweh. America is proud of being a melting pot because liberty unites and allows us to agree on essentials and to promote diversity in nonessentials and charity in all. We saw this unity among diversity in the Tea Party and the Ron Paul Revolution; we did not see the coded speech and redefinition described here.
Please do not fall for factors that forum-shift anonymous effort away from the Q movement and into ineffective tangential matters.
Genocide.
Please help me understand. We are all against racism. May we use the word "anti-racist" to describe that without it being redefined as "anti-white"? Anti-whites are racist by definition. If you prefer "color-blind", that's fine, but I don't know that people like that word either.
What is the best word for being against racism that does not get one's position being confused with a racist position? You see the quandary.
I didn't go further. If you love Yahweh, you love truth. Let's start by speaking the truth. Not everyone is against racism
Okay, thanks, I am happy to proceed on the truth of Yahweh, in love.
Yes, my statement is a quick overgeneralization meant to assist in unity. More accurately, the forum policy is "follow the law"; "they want you labeled by race" with "they" meaning "the true target"; and "no racism", a reporting rule. To be pedantic (again, meaning to assist), that means the forum is against racism and members that are not are subject to penalty.
So am I wrong to object to the idea that "anti-racist" should be redefined as "anti-white", or that "anti-white" is in fact a racist description? The fact that allegations of racism are typically not themselves made color-blindly is so glaringly obvious that it doesn't need these additional distortions to get people to see it. If I'm missing something obvious, I'd like to know!