Found this on LinkdIn just now - The best is yet to come
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (109)
sorted by:
Not only does that occur to us, but that is what we believed, until we looked into it ourselves (just to mock it, like you are doing) and then saw the evidence and heard the words and interviews directly from the sources themselves. Like NASA themselves posts informative interviews with the artists who create the computer generated images of planets. Read the fine print on those photos and they are never called photos, but images. By NASA’s own admission there has never been an undoctored photo of Earth. Every image they have put out has been created by an artist. Doesn’t it seem strange that they won’t even release one photo of Earth? Just one that they could say, “That is our planet. An untouched photo. I know it doesn’t look as exciting as our computer generated images, but this is the real deal. Earth, untouched!” Instead we get these artist renditions that are so absurd that when we line them up year by year, the Earth never looks the same twice. Not just weather and lighting, but the size and shape of continents.
A computer generated image is not a photograph. That’s not splitting hairs. That’s the difference between evidence and fakery. They clone-stamped the clouds on one of the most famous images of Earth! That’s not acceptable to me. It’s been fifty years now, I think we deserve at least one actual photo, especially given the millions we pay to NASA every minute.
Once you understand that NASA is not a valid source of information, the whole charade collapses, since NASA is the gatekeeper for all information and evidence. (They were started by Nazis by the way too.)