We must not let Rand Paul ask such humiliating questions. Let the threats begin! ????
(media.greatawakening.win)
? These people are stupid!
Comments (34)
sorted by:
Rand Paul REKT Levine. Love it!
This is invitation of political violence.
If the left wants civil war bring it I say.
I only wish he wouldn't have used the term 'changing your sex.' You can't change your sex. You can do some hormones and you can do some surgery, but it's all just window dressing because you can't actually change your XY or XX chromosomes. Wish he would have pointed that out.
Bingo.
How do any of my fellow biology experts put up with this bullshit?
Sure, there are some rare genetic anomalies, and sure, there is such a thing as epigenetics which can effect some phenotypic outcomes, and sure, some genes that affect your brain chemistry & have a tendency go along with the genes that determine sex & other related genotypes will not follow the trend... But those are often subtle or minor in comparison to everything else contributing to your sexual makeup including your XY chromosomes.
But even if you have a severe case, none of that changes your base sexual genetic makeup. Either you have a Y in there somewhere or you don't.
Spez: Not like progressive engineers aren't trying to get rid of it, though: https://www.google.com/amp/s/theconversation.com/amp/the-y-chromosome-is-disappearing-so-what-will-happen-to-men-90125
But even if the Y does eventually degenerate as they are speculating in that article, the sex genes have to go somewhere, and that somewhere becomes the new "Y" gene.
Trying to remove it and insert it elsewhere to appease some lesbian couple will result in unforseen issues that only hurt the engineered child. And even if they could "perfect" that process (unlikely, as things are so interwoven & complicated that humanity will likely never figure out God's blueprints), in order to do so, they would have to do an ungodly amount of abusive experiments first. You can't be the "good guy" in that scenario no matter how much you try to claim that the ends justify the means.
Point stands, it doesn't matter if you have XY or XXY or XXXY or XXXXY. That Y will give you male characteristics you otherwise don't have, whether they are obvious or not. Genetic engineers trying to futz with it and play God will only end up abusing life. Probably where all that "garbage" stem cell & fetal tissue (a.k.a. unborn children) PP sells is going to right now... Genetic & biological experiments at the expense & abuse of life.
Someone needs to report this violence-loving bitch to Rand Paul's office. Not Twitter since they encourage this sort of violent threats from their fellow lefties.
Isn't it a crime to threaten a Congressperson?
It's probably a fake account, dispatched by some loser organization
Could be. Still, why is it only Liberals can call for violence and not be beholden to it? Wouldn't be the same for a conservatives.
And Twitter says it's okay cause no one reports being threatened.
It's mental illness. Period.
A mental illness can be treated. This is a fetish. It's called autogynephilia. The only cure is to give up the porn or die.
Blech. The height of irony this person is in this role. We have enough problems in this country, we need sane, grounded people to solve them.
I still call it sick ...
Circumcision is genital mutilation too.
not really the essence of what’s being discussed but alright
It's just something I feel strongly about and want more people aware of. We mock clitoral genital mutilation by middle eastern cultures while simultaneously multilating the majority of our boys genitals without consent. It's an abominable hypocrisy.
I agree 100%. Circumcision is cruel and done without consent. A baby is born beautiful and perfect and doesn’t need modification.
Those, too, aren’t comparable.
Cutting off loose skin is not the same as removing the clitoris.
It’s like comparing cutting fingernails to cutting fingers.
The extra skin provides elasticity and rubs the glans every time you plat with it or thrust.
I have never used lubrication, for example.
Neither have I. Again, not comparable.
It's not loose skin mate, you've been brainwashed. It serves an important role in intercourse for both the man and woman. Being circumcised means you will never have sex the way humans were intended to. It's the exact same thing.
It’s a naturalistic fallacy.
Not sure what you think you're saying, but that was a useless comment. Try again with an actual argument, though you'll just be wasting your time as this isn't something you can argue about, I'm just stating facts.
The foreskin has thousands of nerves and serves as a sort of 'lubricant' for the female. It increases the pleasure of both partners as well as making the male a little 'bigger'. Cutting it off decreases the pleasure for you and your fututre partners. Now you can either listen to this and learn or reject it and keep being a good little tool.
What a stupid argument.
“It has cells” rofl
“Increases pleasure” you’re not doing it right then
I understand your insecurity. I don’t understand why you’d feel the need to tell the world about it
Cognitive dissonance
This tweet needs to be removed due to implied threats of violence. Just because you (not OP but the girl who tweeted this) present it as a "veiled" concern troll doesn't make it any more less potentially violent. Anyone with Twitter needs to report this person for inciteful rhetoric.
Rand Paul's neighbor might be a pedo. IKD for sure, worth investigating.
Ah yes, the party of unity and healing
https://www.brighteon.com/453844df-8df8-4acf-b9ca-6f365fe4e5ee
The term they use now is "gender confirmation surgery".
These people are sick.