Not arguing with you, but if there is an appointed 'designee' to be voted into office for the Dems (or DS, whomever), why were there 17+ candidates in the Dem primary? Seems like 'everybody' on their side would already know who is the chosen winner, in advance, and the Dems then throw in a handful more candidates just for appearances. Nearly every one of the candidates for 2020 would have been close enough to Dem leadership to be told what their roles were. Why go thru the scrutiny and effort? The fact that Kamala was dragged back into play after her <1% washout in the primary confirms for me that this was all pre-planned. Also, that a clearly dementia-riddled, 60% candidate was chosen as their figurehead for the top spot completely revealed their method of taking over the US. 2 puppets. An heir and spare that can be/are completely controlled by outsiders.
Not arguing with you, but if there is an appointed 'designee' to be voted into office for the Dems (or DS, whomever), why were there 17+ candidates in the Dem primary? Seems like 'everybody' on their side would already know who is the chosen winner, in advance, and the Dems then throw in a handful more candidates just for appearances. Nearly every one of the candidates for 2020 would have been close enough to Dem leadership to be told what their roles were. Why go thru the scrutiny and effort? The fact that Kamala was dragged back into play after her <1% washout in the primary confirms for me that this was all pre-planned. Also, that a clearly dementia-riddled, 60% candidate was chosen as their figurehead for the top spot completely revealed their method of taking over the US. 2 puppets. An heir and spare that can be/are completely controlled by outsiders.