Please define paytriot, since it can't possibly mean every patriot who sells products or earns money from his work exposing and attacking the deep state, promoting Trump and Q, etc. What is the defining feature(s) in your opinion?
Why wouldn't it?
Take this site for example. You are only believable in your beliefs imo if you don't try to sell them to followers. GA.win doesn't monetize, and that's how it should be. Q didn't monetize either, unless the Watkins had some scheme going that I am not aware of.
You are only believable in your beliefs imo if you don't try to sell them to followers.
Ever been to a church? It goes like this: "Here's some beliefs....now here's the collection plate. Give us ten percent of all the money you made last week. Not net, either, but the gross." They say it's going to God, but he already has literally everything there is; so they keep it instead. Tax free, too, unlike the Q researchers and decoders.
How the idea that making money is bad—even if done morally and ethically, without stealing or cheating—ever crept into this group I will never know. If people can't understand that others who make a vocation of devoting vast portions of their waking hours to this, for us to consume and share, still need to eat and feed their families, then that's OK. Personally I don't see anything wrong with getting paid to do stellar work that advances the cause of liberty, but we can agree to disagree.
My definition is that a paytriot cares more about money than the movement. There has to be a line drawn somewhere or every content creator including Redpill78 and X22report who have ads in their videos and Praying Medic and NeonRevolt who wrote educational books about Q are all paytriots.
Back when Q used to actively post, Dave Hayes (Praying Medic) each day would create a tweet and a video presenting each Q drop, decoding it, relating it to others, drawing connections, etc. My wife and I found his material tremendously helpful and straightforward, his delivery honest and unpretentious. He never gave the impression of caring first and foremost about getting rich, just trying to support himself while he provided valuable service and hope to patriots and Trump lovers worldwide. His book explaining Q also is excellent. Is it not worth a book being written to explain it? Must the author be independently wealthy or able to live off scraps of garbage in order to be legit? He was doing nothing else but Q full time for a long time.
I'm not sure how a person could support themself doing that if they didn't try to monetize it. The animosity against the American entrepreneurial spirit that's on display here is puzzling and actually comes off more than a little sanctimonious.
So we as patriots agree to disagree. I refuse to demonize those who monetize when they're demonstrating a solid work ethic and patriotism and sharing good quality data.
Please define paytriot, since it can't possibly mean every patriot who sells products or earns money from his work exposing and attacking the deep state, promoting Trump and Q, etc. What is the defining feature(s) in your opinion?
Thanx
Why wouldn't it? Take this site for example. You are only believable in your beliefs imo if you don't try to sell them to followers. GA.win doesn't monetize, and that's how it should be. Q didn't monetize either, unless the Watkins had some scheme going that I am not aware of.
Ever been to a church? It goes like this: "Here's some beliefs....now here's the collection plate. Give us ten percent of all the money you made last week. Not net, either, but the gross." They say it's going to God, but he already has literally everything there is; so they keep it instead. Tax free, too, unlike the Q researchers and decoders.
How the idea that making money is bad—even if done morally and ethically, without stealing or cheating—ever crept into this group I will never know. If people can't understand that others who make a vocation of devoting vast portions of their waking hours to this, for us to consume and share, still need to eat and feed their families, then that's OK. Personally I don't see anything wrong with getting paid to do stellar work that advances the cause of liberty, but we can agree to disagree.
My definition is that a paytriot cares more about money than the movement. There has to be a line drawn somewhere or every content creator including Redpill78 and X22report who have ads in their videos and Praying Medic and NeonRevolt who wrote educational books about Q are all paytriots.
Thanks for replying.
Back when Q used to actively post, Dave Hayes (Praying Medic) each day would create a tweet and a video presenting each Q drop, decoding it, relating it to others, drawing connections, etc. My wife and I found his material tremendously helpful and straightforward, his delivery honest and unpretentious. He never gave the impression of caring first and foremost about getting rich, just trying to support himself while he provided valuable service and hope to patriots and Trump lovers worldwide. His book explaining Q also is excellent. Is it not worth a book being written to explain it? Must the author be independently wealthy or able to live off scraps of garbage in order to be legit? He was doing nothing else but Q full time for a long time.
I'm not sure how a person could support themself doing that if they didn't try to monetize it. The animosity against the American entrepreneurial spirit that's on display here is puzzling and actually comes off more than a little sanctimonious.
So we as patriots agree to disagree. I refuse to demonize those who monetize when they're demonstrating a solid work ethic and patriotism and sharing good quality data.
I thinks it's more about constantly asking for money or only sharing information behind a paywall.
Praying medic allowed anyone to see his research without payment. You weren't bombarded with ads either. And legit he got banned off YouTube.
Yes x 5