I checked some of their source code and have some interesting findings.
George.news uses the app id 362293833600.
<meta content="362293833600" property="fb:app_id" />
If we look the owner up, we get the following response from FB: https://graph.facebook.com/362293833600
"category": "Utilities",
"link": "https://paper.li/",
"name": "Paper.li",
"namespace": "paper_li",
"id": "362293833600"
}
Ok so I want to find out what this paper.li is about, they provide out of the box platforms for news/blogs just as George news is a customer of them. Ok so far.
- I digged further into the api of this platform, it was created in "created_at":"2018-10-21T18:23:02Z". So the account that george news uses, is much older (pre-planned) or spin-off from failed project?.
"created_at":"2018-10-21T18:23:02Z"
https://george.news/~api/papers/04247827-e179-48cb-856b-48c99fd91e16?
What really bothers me, Paper.li is owned by Finity SA (finity.ai) according to their Privacy policy https://paper.li/privacy.html.
On their website there is a video under the tab "events" https://finity.ai/#onglet1|2 where they hosted or monitored the World Economic Forum Live event tweets etc. So the company behind the platform of George.news is working for the WEF!
The profile picture below of george news links to https://dfns.tv, which redirects to their youtube channel a whois search doesn't bring anything up. Who can dig further into this?
https://defensetv.org is also build on top of paper.li it has a different and more realistic creation date. "created_at":"2020-02-06T08:22:55Z"
Source: https://defensetv.org/~api/papers/a9525c52-a7d6-4059-bc78-e186a944fafb
credits: @Cosmoa
They are tracking every move via the following integrations: Twitter, facebook, google analytics (GTM), Addthis button and paper.li tracking. Hello privacy ?
QDROP Seems more than a coincidence that this drop was also in 2018. Could it be that they knew that George news was Fake News psyop? https://qalerts.app/?n=529 credits: @Blind_Marksman
UPDATE
BIG FIND: they are loading https://z.moatads.com/addthismoatframe568911941483/moatframe.js into to George news website. Searching for moatads on Google gives you the following result:.
Moatads Moatads.com is a browser hijacker that comes to your computer in the form of add-on for Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox and Internet Explorer. ... Moatads.com also can analyze your browsing and collect your personal data. Some data may be transferred to third parties without your consent.
Update: Addthis and Moat are Oracle company products, just some more tracking services. If you have adblock enabled it will block them by default. Never trust google as main source.Thanks @scyenceFiction
They don't have a privacy policy or terms and conditions page. Every website has one even GAW. Who are they?
Credits: @FrenchFrogsForTrump
GeorgeSoros News.
This pretty much seals the deal
If you can't trust a news company because of a spurious connection to JFK jr, who Q had to reaffirm died when he died, then who the hell am I supposed to trust?
Very funny. Sometimes hope is what keeps us going. My own process about George has included skepticism from the start, but I kept the free email sub for the occasional articles that I didn't see elsewhere that didn't feel like an attempt to steer opinion. I'm truly grateful for this dig, because those articles were actually few and far between. So yeah, I admit that I believe that the younger Kennedy is actually alive. Q answering "No" isn't especially definitive to me for a multitude of reasons. Bye George!
this^ doesn't really bother me either way, obvious that paytriots exist and I'm old enough to discern. and kind of wonder why we didn't put this much effort into Juan Osavin and his production...lots of those videos are posted and a group always defends them...
I don't know nothin about Juan but I think a lot of it has to do with transparency. If you're some dude that does research on this all and talks about it, and collects donations to continue to do that, and you're transparent that you do that and stuff, I don't see anything wrong with that. If, on the other hand, you're being intentionally vague and cryptic and telling people you have "inside information" and then asking or enabling donations and selling merchandise... that's very different.
Charlie and Simon come to mind..
Simon the "alien fucker"? lmao yep
So it's not just the telegram account it's the whole George shebang?? We've been following this since Q went dark. Alot of wasted time AND false decodes if that's the case?! Say it isn't so!
No outside comms. Should have listened ?♂️
Many of us did and ate our downvotes. That's why I like this place. Can't bury the truth no matter how much you want to trust the group think.
why though?
why was anyone expecting anything from G, when Q said 'no outside comms'....
yeh yeh smarty-pants. You're only the 500th person to say that. I've been aware of George since the fall of the cabal documentary and people post their content here linking to Q posts etc and the rest of us browsing thru read it, see it as hopium. Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me,
my dad used to call me that:) and wasn't trying to be rude, just pointing out Q's logic. stinks that we even have to discuss this, wish everyone could do what's right and just tell the truth...
that's not what (((they))) do :)
yeah, what was I thinking? thanks for the reminder
"Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
Just doesn't sound the same unless it's coming from the mouth of George Dubbya
All profits go to BLM and Antifa hordes
Ok, so then what is the point?? Why would the cabal fund an operation that shares news articles they don't want shared? Why would they use that operation to give us messages of hope? Telling us not to give up, that Trump is still fighting for us, and that the PLAN is still in effect?
The only way that helps the cabal is if Q has been a psy-op all along.
This is how controlled opposition works. If someone doesn't trust you, create an alias who mostly says what someone wants to hear. Then after trust is built you can slowly steer or poison the narrative.
It could literally just be a bunch of folks in their basement raking in cash and laughing at the "stupid qanons".
Done a quiet search on a different S/E for "Paper lil"
https://paper.li/
Paper.li is a product of Finity SA, a Swiss company. Our international team specializes in design, development, data science, and digital marketing.
Talk to us [email protected]
Finity SA Innovation Park EPFL Building C 1015 Lausanne Switzerland
I'm with the OP, if anyone is using a service in Switzerland and they seem to be using https://www.dfns.com/about these people for a start.
Smacks to me of a massive PAYTRIOT scheme!
Or worse...
I would like to point out that paper.li is a hosting/content creation site. That's like saying "wordpress is owned by insert globalist so therefore it shows that every website built on wordpress is suspicious"
Not saying that george is or isn't real, just that there really isn't a correlation here.
Sometimes a technology is just a technology like wordpress, paper.li, gatsby, etc. Technologies used to accomplish creating sites.
I agree but there is a big difference in a free Wordpress where you can handle every single line of code and even more tech knowledge is needed with a Gatsby like solution.
While this paper.li and the company behind it are consuming and using this data for their own benefit and I don’t think they are able to switch it off.
Remember. If the product is free, you are the product.
That's true, but I hardly agree with your estimation of what wordpress is. Yes you can manage every line of code in wordpress, but is that reasonable? I don't think so. You would have to be a php dev + more to be able to do it. Same with gatsby or other builders. If you can find an out of the box solution that allows you to drag/drop, that would be even better because you drastically cut your upfront capital and need to hire a development team.
paper.li is a platform to make a news based site with little to no technical knowledge. It's the best platform for the job for a bunch of non tech minded people. Same thing with lots of other packaged website solutions. They fit the bill. So if you need a fairly simple news based website without needing to be a developer, and want it up and running quickly, it makes sense to pick something like that. I would do something like that if I needed something simple and didn't want to pay lots to design a brand new site from the bottom up.
My point is that they probably searched for a page/site builder because they wanted to host articles/etc and they picked a popular builder that was featured in Wired and other popular sources to get the job done. Doesn't mean correlation and that they have a personal relationship with the owner.
I’m not stating they have direct connection. I’m just making you guys aware that platform behind it captures the data and do allot of stuff with it, and they just coincidentally worked recently for the WEF. You are a free men to do whatever you want with it.
Thank you.
This is like saying "Pompeo has a twitter account so he must be part of the DS."
Yes exactly. Sometimes it's not really a coincidence but we have spent 5 years looking for coincidences so it's difficult to see outside the box.
They could easy build a website that doesn’t share their user data with a company directly connected to tier 1 companies. It’s not the same.
Yes I hear you and understand. I hadn't given George much thought to be fair, and assumed it had direct connections with the military in the sense that its picture/film came directly from them. I suppose I assumed it was hosted, created via the DOD.
I'm kinda concerned that Evspra did this investigation declared himself to be right and banned George from the site.
Don't censor us. We want to have a discussion. Not everyone on this site is going to be as ready as you are to write them off and you're harming the community by not allowing people to talk about it. By all means remove posts that outright endorse their telegram but how they respond to being called out is also of interest.
Only direct links are banned. You can, and are, talking about george.
Sorry sir. For some reason (probably me being retarded) I couldn't find it. I'll edit my comment.
The way to prove they are insiders is to have some proof that is totally unique.
Yeah this seems far too fast. The investigation done is hardly thorough.
I agree. There is a possibility it is legit. Why not let people post and use it if they want. Unless we are NOW convinced Q is a SOROS scheme, we shouldn't ban stuff like george
No one think s Q is a Soros scheme. George News is what's in question and George News isn't Q.
Just got here...is there a reason people jumped to "Soros controls George News"? Skimming the comments I'm not seeing any evidence.
don't forget Kansas and flynn
Sidney with an "i". I get that autocorrect can change it, but too many are spelling her name incorrectly.
Now, we are finally getting somewhere.
You can't trust any "news source" right now. Way too much disinfo. out there as the information warfare rages.
No one knows.
Lin Wood and Sidney Powell are the real deal.
What do you know about 400 pound hookers, and why did that pop up in a conversation about secrets being exposed, hm?
Okay thanks thats explains why they own https://dfns.tv.
Just looked around the network requests on that site and found this page. I have absolutely no idea what it means but it is a collection of JSON data that links to other stuff. Maybe others can take a look https://defensetv.org/~api/papers/a9525c52-a7d6-4059-bc78-e186a944fafb
This is what i debugged, this a json format of the content of the website. Without this data feed their would be no data on the website. (try disabling javascript to see my point).
Defensetv account creation date:
"created_at":"2020-02-06T08:22:55Z"This validates my point that the paper.li account of george news was already created in 2018.
Nice find! I think so.
Who they? George? trying to follow, fren
The thing is that you can find georgenews in google means it’s DS-controlled
Someone just asked them on telegram about why they use paper.li and they said "why deal with Switzerland?"
yes why?
lol answer a question with a question.
textbook technique of liars and fraudsters.
At first I was agreeing with the OP, but now I reverse my opinion on that. There is a good reason to use a Swedish website, for privacy reasons. On the paper.li website:
"Join a million passionate people who use paper.li"
It's just a website builder that many people use. If the WEF uses it for one of their sites, it doesn't mean much.
Privacy reasons?
They have tracking code enabled for Facebook, Twitter, Google Analytics and Paper.li actively monitoring every click you do.
Sorry you can add addthis.com to the list.
Everyone needs to use Brave Browser. It blocks all those trackers and spyware mess.
How about the dissenter browser?
Dissenter is actually based off brave. Essentially gab's version of it.
Brave pays you in their crypto. Does Dissenter do that too?
Don't think it does, but it doesn't have built-in ads either
Ads in Brave are opt-in only. I’ve got no beef with that. If you want to get paid, turn them on. If not, leave them off since they’re off by default.
Doubtful. See my comment later down the thread.
Dam hackers! We woulda gotten away with it too if it hadn't been for you pesky kids!
Sounds like CIA to me.
Hello George
I'm updating this article with comments and new findings. Check out point 8 for yourself!
This was VERY insightful! - Thank you.
Good dig mod. Glad you're here to protect us from such infiltraitors.
I am grateful not to have jumped on the George bandwagon, and am thankful to the Mod and Anons who have served this community by digging deep and exposing the true nature of that site. May those paytriots follow the path of their namesake GHWB into hell.
Not a bad dig, pede. I will offer a suggestion on #8. It's not malware in the traditional sense. Check the link you sourced the info from, that is most likely the malware (more correctly, scareware) site.
Moatads belongs to Moat, a legitimate company that provides 'ad services' (hosting, analytics, sales, content generation, etc.). They were a competitor to Doubleclick (which was bought by Google many years ago). Moat itself was bought by Oracle back in 2017.
They're no more nefarious of an ad provider than Google, Facebook or Microsoft. What might make them less nefarious is that they're owned by Oracle and Larry Ellison.
Ellison's not exactly based, but he leans MAGA and friendly with DJT. He definitely despises the "nouveau riche" of the tech world. Very unlikely he's trying to construct a social credit system, and wouldn't sell raw data- he'd figure out a way to keep the data and monetize the mining thereof.
I think if he felt like it, he'd be happy to burn down Facebook, Twitter and Google just for shits and grins. If he could make money while putting them all in the poorhouse, it would just get done.
Thanks for your contribution. You are correct, i'll update with correct information.
Coincidence? :-)
The deep state are sick.
This fiasco is identical to what the DS did with the left. Once the left exposed their frauds, the money dried up. They needed another movement to profit off of.
Unlike the left, this only lasted a few months rather than 4 years
I always thought Q drop 529 was referring to George H. W. Bush, because he died later that year.
Good thing I never clicked on any George News links; my paranoia pays off again.
Thanks again for all your efforts mate.... much appreciated....!
WWG1WGA
This entire thread is detailing how a marketing website works. Paper.li is a system as a service, they don't work for anyone. It's connected to their social media accounts which what all marketing websites do. Moat[ads] is an ad service from MOAT https://moat.com/
I think you jumped the gun on the conclusions being made here.
This entire thing and the way everyone is responding towards it goes against the nature of what we want. Everyone including Evspra is sounding like an angry mob reacting to emotions on a whim.
The question is why are they using this specific platform? Especially when its linked to big tech companies. I don’t know any other media company that uses this platform.
And the companies behind the Trump platforms (Twitter, FB, YouTube, etc) literally rigged and ripped away our democracy and they are leveraging their unparalleled power in order to continue censoring Americans.
I'm fine with being critical of George.news and "paytriots." I haven't bought any of their merch and don't intend to, but I don't like some of these arguments.
Heck, if you go to https://www.donaldjtrump.com/ right now you will still find Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, etc... and these companies are traitors to the highest degree! FAR worse than selling a couple sweatshirts.
Why would you know anyone else using it? I'm sure there's a ton of small business's and mom and pop shops that use it. Why does anyone choose a service? They read reviews and pick which suits their needs the best. This is a competitive space and start ups pop up everywhere around it. There's a ton of reviews and articles describing it as a good tool to use.
I'm a software engineer.
https://www.trustradius.com/products/paper-li/reviews https://www.pcworld.com/article/2013965/review-paper-li-creates-your-personalized-online-newspaper.html https://www.commonsensemedia.org/website-reviews/paperli
They don’t even have showcases of websites that they are hosting. They don’t have reviews on their website. The links you mention are fishy as hell. The second link review comes from “ Generic Company Place Holder Paper.li” give me a break!
They use the same Facebook app and GTM code for all these websites including theirs. If you are a software developer you should know this isn’t normal. You want your own analytics.
Not every service has reviews or lists of their clients. That's a pcworld article and it looks like she didn't remove the default text in front of "Paper.li".. you're jumping the gun here with a wrong assumption. These were quick links I picked up, I'm sure you could find better quality information if you dug. Ther's a lot of tools you never heard of that is similar https://www.trustradius.com/products/paper-li/competitors
Not every company can do their own analytics so they use these tools with Facebook to handle their marketing. Not every company uses the hottest/most popular tools or can afford to do their own things.
I'm 100% with the plan and discerning how this is all unfolding. I can 100% assure you that you're going down the wrong hole here.
I can assure you that I'm a software developer and have been for some time.
You may well be a software developer, and your comments are level-headed and rational. But I think this thread - and your discussion - has veered off topic.
I agree that paper.li is a good resource for small businesses trying to cash in on Internet riches. What causes an issue with George News is that their business is in defrauding gullible people. There's a pattern here: the registering of domains that are meant to imply George News is something they are not. The geo-location spoofing. The posting of content he ripped off from somewhere else yet claims as his own. His claim to not wanting people to donate in the live chat, yet taking every opportunity to relieve the easily-fooled of their money. Heck, click on the banner and it takes you to the shop!
That's not a Q resource, that's a marketing enterprise. Benefiting Mr. Goldfinch personally.
Look, for-profit enterprises use the available MSM tools. That's what they are provided for. The various Trump campaigns make intensive use of these tools provided by the very social media companies they constantly criticize, and much of the money people donate to Trump orgs flows right through to Big Tech and MSM. George News uses paper.li. Ok, so what? What the mods on this site now have taken issue with is that they are a for-profit enterprise scamming confused people in the Q movement who seek direction in confusing times. And that's what's the issue here worth debating.
Well the problem is that these are the arguments that are the basis for what you're saying. I've only seen people say how easy that it is to spoof your location, which doesn't mean they did, and I haven't seen proof to suggest that's what they did. Posting content that's ripped from somewhere else, media organizations do this all of the time from stock sites like the one provided here. Now, the next question you should ask is.. is ALL of their content ripped from a stock site? If it's not ALL of it, then that means they really have been in those places. How about their photo's? Has anyone seen those exact photo's somewhere else? All of them?
You didn’t take a look or don’t understand what infinity.ai does. Please take a look, and then you see they are just that - a analytics tool.
Wish you all the best further.
I did and I do understand. What support are you suggesting with them being an analytics tool?
What’s with all these George post who gaf there some shit heads on telegram do we really need a 100 post on the subject more important shit going on then this petty waste of space and time
I stopped joining the live chats and leaving comments, Ive always felt they were Intel gathering on us to find out what we know
Nice work!
My only exposure to george seems to be the one time i clicked to watch a vid last week...and the posts here on GW that originated on george. otherwise i stayed away.
no outside comms careful who you follow In the end the only comms possible might be on QResearch it's self. all said by Q.
If folks are thinking george is comped and most likely are given the intel now on hand....beware however even this "win" could dissolve as well. Learning to bake and battling state sponsored shillbots might be in all our futures.
Fantastic work OP anon .
Remember, everybody, we're the "retards". :)
Wow. Good find.
Anyone still using Chrome, Firefox or Explorer are idiots. Unless you're forced to do it at work. Then your bosses are the idiots.
I remember someone said, as a line of evidence that George was was based in Trump tower at the start (2016?) But that is also when Trump Tower wast tapped...