Good points here, TBH I felt the total condemnation of GEORGE news was made a bit hastily. Are you suggesting it was setup in way to preserve the videographers anonymity?
It's a possibility, and it certainly does work that way. I never would've guessed until now that the media came from DVIDS (i never even knew it existed), just like most footage (stock + raw) used by other news and media organisations.
I am not convinced that they are stealing the content as some believe they're doing, otherwise they'd be taken down hard on YouTube as a Pro-Trump outlet.
The whole situation seems like this mod got banned and got butt hurt over it and is retaliating by saying this entity is bs because they took some pictures from a website.
The way the mod is attacking you supports my thesis. Mod is acting like a child.
Thank you. Very well written letter that was not antagonistic. Some are shocked that they get banned when they start slinging the terms LIARS...THIEVES....STOLEN VALOR. Thank you again
“One influential member of the community whom I shall refer to as XXXXX has leveled accusations against Georgenews relating to your organization that if taken too far, could prove defamatory.”
Give a bit of background as to why I'm asking for info. I won't be mincing words there, it really is grounds for defamation if Evspra's allegations all turns out to be false. And I will write however I see it.
Well, it turns out that the email was for naught anyway.
Anyone who's open to the possibility that it could be false. No, I did not say it was false, I said that it could turn out to be false. For all I know Evspra could be spot on the money. But I am not as convinced that it's true and confirmed as you or Evspra.
And that's why I reached out to DVIDS in the first place.
But to flail around declaring the actions of the few people most clearly uncovering the evident truth as potentially “defamatory” is utterly bizarre and unjustifiable.
Well, I could deport you for you earlier comments to another user about them deep-throating George. Perhaps I ought to?
I tell you, you're being nasty here. You're being disrespectful to me and other users who share my opinion just because we disagree with you. You're replying to us in childish form, derailing the discussion as you have done here, inciting us to anger. You're not acting like the mod that I once respected. You're acting like a snarky teen whose findings have made him feel like king of the world with all the power to mock dissent. You're being a hypocrite who won't allow us to engage in a civil discussion.
So what if I do like George? So what if I am trying to investigate and make a case for George? What's it to you? Something worth a disgareement maybe. In which case you could just point out that the DOD-credentials aren't what you think that I think that they are.
You see, you think I'm a shill. You think everyone else who is in agreement with me is a shill. That everyone who agrees with you is completely right and 100% true. You think that you hold the only truth. Well then, shut this place down! Go ahead! Our differing opinions don't mean a damn thing to you! You've got the power, you're top mod, you're site dev, you have everything to shut it all down because case closed, you and your friends are right 100%.
But you won't, because you acknowledge that we also hold a shard of the truth. It might not be your truth, but it is a part of the whole truth. That's why forums like this exist. We gather and discuss what we think is true, vet it, share it, piece it together like a jigsaw puzzle, and come out with a bigger picture.
Have some humility. This forum is not all about you. This forum is about us trying to figure out the truth.
a few thoughts..
I would have assumed it was public domain off hand..
I would view the embedded logo as a reference to source (as is done in presenting information prepared by others in a paper)
In one sense George News is providing credit for the video by leaving the logo.
In fact it would be more suspect if they blocked it out or overlaid a "George" logo.
In any case it is better than MSM and "Undisclosed source"...
I worked on an Air Force game as well as one that had every branch. You can use your, it’s yours by the way tax payer, your various military logos as long as it’s not a product you’re selling. You can still use it, but they may give you shit. No one has really fought them. They would win. These are not private companies. We wanted them to like us so we went through the process, but we could have used it. Fought them and won. Probably got a big story fighting back for the American tax payer who is the one who owns all that shit. But we played along to stay on their good side.
After being banned earlier today, the mods let me back in.
I would like to think we are the good guys. Good guys DO NOT need to censor anyone or anything. We are not afraid of false allegations, because truth is on our side. The problem is, truth from anywhere or anyone including President Trump is a tightly held commodity, the most precious weapon in our arsenal. It's clear to me that one of the most important aspects of Q is to get all of us together trying to figure out what they did to us, what they are doing and what they plan to do to all of us collectively. Let us put our egos aside and get back to the task at hand, that task as my wife and I see it is to save the children and adults being used, ground up, an eaten by these fucking animals. We never believed it could be so bad and I don't think we can even imagine how bad it is.
peace.
I don’t know what happened to my comment haha. DOD military and civilians are directed to not give any info out. They have been overly pushing that this last year with everything going on. The answer was a pretty basic one. Not affiliated check our copyright policy! Lol
The only thing I remember George news is JFKjr used to own the magazine.At this point in this adventure, I trust nothing as 100% and listen to all perspectives. Diffrent people belive dffrent things. I believe in UFO's. Why, because I saw one. Do I catorgorize all those that don't as false or spreading misinformation because they don't belive in them? NO! I ignore those things that do not ring true to me in my heart and incompass those things that do. In the end the best thing anyone can do at this point is to hope for the best but prepar for the worst.
Excellent dig. I believe you are closer to accurate than George News being a larp. They always produce thought provoking information. I dont care they may have some merchandise to sell as they appear to be a news organization with real access behind the lines.
He's still listed as a mod. What he's doing is watching who has his back here and who is against him so that he knows who to ban when he returns. Think of it as his way of taking out the trash.
Just a shitpost, folks, but it would seriously suck if his departure was permanent.
Given enough time we will know within a week. I haven't really jumped in the waters in this discussion with GN because I am just taking a wait and see approach.
Good points here, TBH I felt the total condemnation of GEORGE news was made a bit hastily. Are you suggesting it was setup in way to preserve the videographers anonymity?
It's a possibility, and it certainly does work that way. I never would've guessed until now that the media came from DVIDS (i never even knew it existed), just like most footage (stock + raw) used by other news and media organisations.
I am not convinced that they are stealing the content as some believe they're doing, otherwise they'd be taken down hard on YouTube as a Pro-Trump outlet.
The whole situation seems like this mod got banned and got butt hurt over it and is retaliating by saying this entity is bs because they took some pictures from a website.
The way the mod is attacking you supports my thesis. Mod is acting like a child.
Thank you. Very well written letter that was not antagonistic. Some are shocked that they get banned when they start slinging the terms LIARS...THIEVES....STOLEN VALOR. Thank you again
“One influential member of the community whom I shall refer to as XXXXX has leveled accusations against Georgenews relating to your organization that if taken too far, could prove defamatory.”
“Defamatory”?
The fuq?
Are you Dominion’s lawyer, too?
Give a bit of background as to why I'm asking for info. I won't be mincing words there, it really is grounds for defamation if Evspra's allegations all turns out to be false. And I will write however I see it.
Well, it turns out that the email was for naught anyway.
Who in their right, decent mind is claiming them to be “false”?
Anyone who's open to the possibility that it could be false. No, I did not say it was false, I said that it could turn out to be false. For all I know Evspra could be spot on the money. But I am not as convinced that it's true and confirmed as you or Evspra.
And that's why I reached out to DVIDS in the first place.
Anything could turn out to be false.
But to flail around declaring the actions of the few people most clearly uncovering the evident truth as potentially “defamatory” is utterly bizarre and unjustifiable.
I agree that I should've worded it differently, but what's sent is sent.
Cool, cool.
What the hell Evspra, why are you breaking your own forum rules?
Well, I could deport you for you earlier comments to another user about them deep-throating George. Perhaps I ought to?
I tell you, you're being nasty here. You're being disrespectful to me and other users who share my opinion just because we disagree with you. You're replying to us in childish form, derailing the discussion as you have done here, inciting us to anger. You're not acting like the mod that I once respected. You're acting like a snarky teen whose findings have made him feel like king of the world with all the power to mock dissent. You're being a hypocrite who won't allow us to engage in a civil discussion.
So what if I do like George? So what if I am trying to investigate and make a case for George? What's it to you? Something worth a disgareement maybe. In which case you could just point out that the DOD-credentials aren't what you think that I think that they are.
You see, you think I'm a shill. You think everyone else who is in agreement with me is a shill. That everyone who agrees with you is completely right and 100% true. You think that you hold the only truth. Well then, shut this place down! Go ahead! Our differing opinions don't mean a damn thing to you! You've got the power, you're top mod, you're site dev, you have everything to shut it all down because case closed, you and your friends are right 100%.
But you won't, because you acknowledge that we also hold a shard of the truth. It might not be your truth, but it is a part of the whole truth. That's why forums like this exist. We gather and discuss what we think is true, vet it, share it, piece it together like a jigsaw puzzle, and come out with a bigger picture.
Have some humility. This forum is not all about you. This forum is about us trying to figure out the truth.
Civil Discussion ONLY. You're not engaging me in civil discussion, and you're being an asshole.
a few thoughts.. I would have assumed it was public domain off hand.. I would view the embedded logo as a reference to source (as is done in presenting information prepared by others in a paper) In one sense George News is providing credit for the video by leaving the logo. In fact it would be more suspect if they blocked it out or overlaid a "George" logo. In any case it is better than MSM and "Undisclosed source"...
Doesn't the public domain mean anyone can use their stuff?
Pretty much, but only George has been using their stuff in this way, 1-to-1 unadulterated "repost".
I worked on an Air Force game as well as one that had every branch. You can use your, it’s yours by the way tax payer, your various military logos as long as it’s not a product you’re selling. You can still use it, but they may give you shit. No one has really fought them. They would win. These are not private companies. We wanted them to like us so we went through the process, but we could have used it. Fought them and won. Probably got a big story fighting back for the American tax payer who is the one who owns all that shit. But we played along to stay on their good side.
After being banned earlier today, the mods let me back in.
I would like to think we are the good guys. Good guys DO NOT need to censor anyone or anything. We are not afraid of false allegations, because truth is on our side. The problem is, truth from anywhere or anyone including President Trump is a tightly held commodity, the most precious weapon in our arsenal. It's clear to me that one of the most important aspects of Q is to get all of us together trying to figure out what they did to us, what they are doing and what they plan to do to all of us collectively. Let us put our egos aside and get back to the task at hand, that task as my wife and I see it is to save the children and adults being used, ground up, an eaten by these fucking animals. We never believed it could be so bad and I don't think we can even imagine how bad it is. peace.
How did you get back in? Asking because I'm banned lol. But all I did was ask kindly about dvidshub.net.
Stopped calling people cunts.
Ooh good point. Perhaps I was in over my head on trying to find out info from DVIDS.
I don’t know what happened to my comment haha. DOD military and civilians are directed to not give any info out. They have been overly pushing that this last year with everything going on. The answer was a pretty basic one. Not affiliated check our copyright policy! Lol
It got deleted!
But yeah now I feel a bit stupid for even thinking I'd get a straight answer from them.
It doesn’t hurt to try!
The only thing I remember George news is JFKjr used to own the magazine.At this point in this adventure, I trust nothing as 100% and listen to all perspectives. Diffrent people belive dffrent things. I believe in UFO's. Why, because I saw one. Do I catorgorize all those that don't as false or spreading misinformation because they don't belive in them? NO! I ignore those things that do not ring true to me in my heart and incompass those things that do. In the end the best thing anyone can do at this point is to hope for the best but prepar for the worst.
Excellent dig. I believe you are closer to accurate than George News being a larp. They always produce thought provoking information. I dont care they may have some merchandise to sell as they appear to be a news organization with real access behind the lines.
Nobody likes to admit they've been conned. But the truth is, we've all been conned one time or another. WWG1WGA
There are still idiots pushing this George bullshit? How sad.
Has anyone looked here?
https://defensetv.org/#/world
He's still listed as a mod. What he's doing is watching who has his back here and who is against him so that he knows who to ban when he returns. Think of it as his way of taking out the trash.
Just a shitpost, folks, but it would seriously suck if his departure was permanent.
Given enough time we will know within a week. I haven't really jumped in the waters in this discussion with GN because I am just taking a wait and see approach.