"In the USA one-hundred years ago, everybody who had food to eat expected rather good health, especially if they lived in small towns. The diseases we have today were rare. At that time, the greatest fears were freezing and starvation. Most other deaths occurred during cold seasons from gradual nightly carbon monoxide and tar poisons from burning wood or coal in fireplaces, wood stoves and ovens where houses, cottages or shacks were closed, poorly ventilated or non-ventilated. That created lung toxicity that caused frequent flu and other respiratory diseases. In major cities, many diseases and deaths were caused by the same indoor pollution plus smog from silversmiths and blacksmiths every few blocks. Rarely was there a sky-high smoke stack that pumped the smog high into the sky, diluting the toxic particles. Also, many factories, homes and buildings used coal-burning furnaces that vaporized mercury into the air. Heavy metal poisons were constantly in the air as they are today but they were held in concentrations in households and narrow streets. When animals are exposed to such air-pollution as coal dust and vaporized mercury, many develop pulmonary diseases like the Black Plague. Vessels for eating and drinking usually were made of poisonous metals, adding to the toxicity that caused diseases of the times. Factually, What Causes Diseases Today ? We are conditioned to believe that germs are the cause of most of our many diseases, that those “germs” are “pathogenic”. It is 99% myth, superstition and false. Animals exposed to all of nature’s microbes do not get diseases. We develop disease PDN #04, Part I Primal Diet Newsletters - Volume 1 (2006) 29 from accumulation of industrial pollution, including vaccines, medication, processed food and household compounds just as they did 100 years ago.(i) However, we have 60,000 more industrial chemicals than we had 100 years ago. Animals in the wild constantly expose themselves to microbes. They lick their and each other's feces and “germs”, including strangers, and never get diseases. The superstitions that we are fed daily by the pharmaceutical, medical and opportunistic bacteria-phobic industries through academia and media, especially television, would lead us to believe that nature is inherently designed to harm and kill us. Academia believes, and indoctrinates us to believe, that most anything from academia and science, even though ideas, laws and formulas change, is truth and the only rational reality. Academia teaches us that science and business are most important but teach us nothing about ourselves and our health. Academia teaches us to revere and accept everything that medicine says is right."
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
Yep, I've seen this before. Recent confirmation of what the REAL HERO of medical research knew and proved back in the 1860 - 1890 period - Antoine Bechamp. It's not even fair to call him "Pasteur's rival". Pasteur was a fame-seeker and fraud extraordinaire. "Bechamp vs Pasteur", circa 1923, is essentially providing identical findings to this interview.
Just as you find rats at garbage dumps, you find "bacteria" in the presence of decaying/diseased/dying tissue. Both are opportunistic "scavengers" whose job it is to clean up the mess. Read Dr. Stefan Lanka's "The Virus Misconception" for a cogent explanation on this topic.
I usually link this to people to explain viruses, its easy to listen to an digest https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Odj1IwJA8Cs
I've seen this guy's work before too, the "solvent" idea. I prefer Lanka's assessment that these "tiny dead things" are just the particulates of dead/decayed tissue/cells.
Dr. Kaufman proposed the "exosome" idea which is another interesting theory.
Solvent? Exosome? Cellular particulates?
Lot's of theories. I'm an Occam's razor kind of guy. I opt for Dr. Lanka, as he's a trained virologist.
Far more illuminating is; Bechamp's "Microzyma", Enderleins "Protid", Reich's "Bion", Naessans "Somatid" discoveries. All one and the same "thing" they saw. The Pleimorphism/Polymorphism model of "bacteria" changing forms depending on the mess that needs to be cleaned-up. Whatever you call "it", it would appear that all life arises from and eventually returns to these fundamental units of life (more fundamental than the "cell" - the actual "builders" of cells). Bechamp explains it best and most accurately IMHO.
Btw Vonderplanitz was heavily influenced by Bechamp but proved him correct or atleast validated his claims throughout his life
I opt for Vonderplanitz since he has 40 years of empirical research on which he claims all of this he discovered most of what he claims on his own and is self funded. Thanks so much for showing me these guys I never heard about! The truth can be found independently and confirmed thats whats so great about hearing these new guys saying the same thing.
Yep agreed. I think Vonderplanitz fundamental ideas are correct, don't get me wrong. I just think what he's calling "viruses" are the microzyma/protid/bion/somatid pleimorphism "clean-up" processes in action. In short, you can simply eliminate the very idea of "virus", making their explanations identical.
Or, you can flip it on its head and recognize that the Latin origin of the word "virus" means "toxic or noxious substance". Just more cabal trickery and deception through the changing of word meanings.
Once you do that, all the researchers (including Vonderplanitz) observations and explanations are harmonious with one another. In a nutshell, there's something in the body that shouldn't be there, and thus, the body defends itself by eradicating this "toxic substance". Which makes perfect sense. Game over for "the germ theory".