I can believe posts with keywords (esp. with unusual punctuation), but these date posts are the least credible in my opinion.
And I don't buy that the Trump insiders at WaPost (possible, esp. with Bezo's* retirement) timed the retraction release date, just so Trump's response would line up with this post.
Q tells you to use game theory, and my game theory tells me that this post is baloney
Trump's was responding to the Washington Post's retraction from TODAY.
Unless the Washington Post intentionally timed their retraction to match this Q post, Trump's response has NOTHING to do with Q.
Sorry, but someone's gotta maintain quality control here
Sorry, but I don't buy it.
I can believe posts with keywords (esp. with unusual punctuation), but these date posts are the least credible in my opinion.
And I don't buy that the Trump insiders at WaPost (possible, esp. with Bezo's* retirement) timed the retraction release date, just so Trump's response would line up with this post.
Q tells you to use game theory, and my game theory tells me that this post is baloney
You sound pretty defensive
Come back when you can discuss this stuff like an adult