Can you explain why Biden's arm is so small relative to mics when it appears above the mics? No explanation other than use of a green screen makes sense to me.
This guy wants you to believe that when a microphone is in a shot they mask them to remove them...
...ok you think, but wait. Remove them, and replace with what? The background right? So they are replacing the mics with grass, and the road, and Biden's own hand, in a moving shot. Like that's their supposed goal right?
But we're in an age where being 15 minutes late on news means you might as well not bother. So who really cares that mics are in the shot?
And wait, so they masked out the mics only to leave them in?
And the mistake was that they simply messed up the layers of the mask... if that's the case why even bother with masking them if you're just going to leave them in??
And lots of shots have mics in them.
But this trivial interview? This one needs them removed you see. Bring in the digital compositing crew, we need to mask out these mics as if it's a Hollywood shot because this nothing interview really can't have mics in it.
And if you pause at a certain spot you can actually see the ground through his sleeve ?♂️
Timestamp for this?
Like halfway through the 4 second mark, it’s pretty quick but easily seen if you scroll the vid
Oh, I think I see what you mean - under his wrist, you can see the grass through the inside of his suit.
Here's a screenshot for posterity: https://i.maga.host/osPLOrr.png
Good eye.
Looks like his shirt the me.
Wow! Qek!
That's masking. You film different plates so you can edit out things you don't want like microphones
It's just a shonky edit.
It's a very standard edit where mics need to be close to the interviewee.
The tight deadlines of news journalism would probably explain the sloppiness.
No other more complicated explanation would make any sense to me. The interview is trivial and barely worth airing.
https://youtu.be/1Jv4wuZumbw
Can you explain why Biden's arm is so small relative to mics when it appears above the mics? No explanation other than use of a green screen makes sense to me.
I love that the pro vaccine anti Q handshake is trying to debunk this.
This guy wants you to believe that when a microphone is in a shot they mask them to remove them...
...ok you think, but wait. Remove them, and replace with what? The background right? So they are replacing the mics with grass, and the road, and Biden's own hand, in a moving shot. Like that's their supposed goal right?
But we're in an age where being 15 minutes late on news means you might as well not bother. So who really cares that mics are in the shot?
And wait, so they masked out the mics only to leave them in?
And the mistake was that they simply messed up the layers of the mask... if that's the case why even bother with masking them if you're just going to leave them in??
And lots of shots have mics in them.
But this trivial interview? This one needs them removed you see. Bring in the digital compositing crew, we need to mask out these mics as if it's a Hollywood shot because this nothing interview really can't have mics in it.
This is bullllllshiiiiiiiit