Could it be the mics have been added, then Biden relayered over? I mean still a terrible job, but possible? I don't know enough to be sure it's green screen.
That would mean they manually made a cutout around his hand in order to clip the microphones under it. That makes no sense unless they wanted it look fake on purpose.
You only mask things being PLACED ON TOP of something else. You don't mask the helicopter in the background because the mics aren't going behind that, for example, and you don't mask Biden either for the same reason. In order for anything, Biden included, to be layered on top of anything, he has to be masked. If he was at that location, why mask him out of the background? The only reason to do that is because you want something to go behind him, ie you want him to be on top of some other element.
What element was he intended to go on top of? The mics? Clearly not, that's the problem here right?
If it was just about getting mics in, you mask the mics, layer THEM on top, and you're done. In order for them to go under, and for Biden to be on top, BIDEN had to be masked. There's no reason to mask him in the innocent explanation. Zero reason. You don't mask him if mics are added, yet he IS masked!
If he is green screened and ADDED to the scene, he is by definition a masked layer. Green screening is the only production throughput explanation where Biden is ever masked in this scenario.
And if he was green screened that means he was never there, and the media know he was never there. Because either they never interviewed him and those are fake news media in that shot that was delivered already edited to the media for distribution -- or they interviewed the air knowing that Biden would be composited in after.
The video was probably from several weeks ago while they were standing around waiting for Trump to come out, and the mics were in original footage, but they screwed up when inserting Biden.
bidan figure did walk across geass to heli, and gaggle with psaki did seem to walk across grass to heli. citi journal did catch em but you have to zooom in.
And it's the only explanation. If all they wanted to do was add the mics, you'd add them on top of the video and Biden couldn't possibly pass over them. In order for Biden to pass on top, BIDEN had to be masked. That's a purposeful act. You record a scene and the bushes don't come masked, the helicopter isn't masked, Biden isn't masked -- you have to do that purposefully and at cost if you want it.
Yet Biden is masked. Why is he masked? If all you wanted to do was add the mics on top, you'd never mask Biden, there's no point, he's always supposed to be behind the mics.
Yet Biden IS masked. Which means HE is the added element here. Which not only means a green screen, but camera tracking to seamlessly insert Biden in for the pan to Marine 1. Welcome to Hollywood. The moonlanding may not have been faked, but our president is, using semi-professional open source tools that even indie filmakers have access to. This shit has been around forever.
Even anti-Q TDW people are saying they're rethinking Q, lol
So public and mainstream that MSM had to quickly start with the lame technical glitch, optical illusion, anything just stop looking!!! Reeee!
Now let TDW start hypothesizing that someone suffering that level of dementia could not cover the speeches, why is he always so well-lit, do his gestures make sense with the audio (because masks hide the mouth), still no SOTU address required by law, could they have pre-recorded his appearances, how far ahead...?
So your idea is that EVERYTHING from start to finish was green screen?
Yes, the whole video is faked. Biden wasn't outside the WH walking to Marine 1 and there were no reporters.
Could it be the mics have been added, then Biden relayered over? I mean still a terrible job, but possible? I don't know enough to be sure it's green screen.
That would mean they manually made a cutout around his hand in order to clip the microphones under it. That makes no sense unless they wanted it look fake on purpose.
I’m wondering if they did. Why do one hand and miss the other?
Think about it. "Biden relayered over."
You only mask things being PLACED ON TOP of something else. You don't mask the helicopter in the background because the mics aren't going behind that, for example, and you don't mask Biden either for the same reason. In order for anything, Biden included, to be layered on top of anything, he has to be masked. If he was at that location, why mask him out of the background? The only reason to do that is because you want something to go behind him, ie you want him to be on top of some other element.
What element was he intended to go on top of? The mics? Clearly not, that's the problem here right?
If it was just about getting mics in, you mask the mics, layer THEM on top, and you're done. In order for them to go under, and for Biden to be on top, BIDEN had to be masked. There's no reason to mask him in the innocent explanation. Zero reason. You don't mask him if mics are added, yet he IS masked!
If he is green screened and ADDED to the scene, he is by definition a masked layer. Green screening is the only production throughput explanation where Biden is ever masked in this scenario.
And if he was green screened that means he was never there, and the media know he was never there. Because either they never interviewed him and those are fake news media in that shot that was delivered already edited to the media for distribution -- or they interviewed the air knowing that Biden would be composited in after.
I think the lighting is off on Biden looks like studio light not sunlight. I would say greenscreen.
The video was probably from several weeks ago while they were standing around waiting for Trump to come out, and the mics were in original footage, but they screwed up when inserting Biden.
bidan figure did walk across geass to heli, and gaggle with psaki did seem to walk across grass to heli. citi journal did catch em but you have to zooom in.
Was that not right after a giant dark jacket crossed completely in front of the camera?
I was zoomed in too far, a white truck passed by around time mark.
time stamp of 11:40-15:03 for bidan figure, and he comments on the gaggel.
Seems like a lot of effort for little reward and high risk.
Just sayin
Okay but is it normal to make 2 different green screen angles...I never heard of that
It's done all the time in modern filmography.
It's really not hard to do. All you have to do is make sure the cameras are in the related positions.
Movies do multiple angles of green screen edits do they not?
In Pravda media, yes.
And it's the only explanation. If all they wanted to do was add the mics, you'd add them on top of the video and Biden couldn't possibly pass over them. In order for Biden to pass on top, BIDEN had to be masked. That's a purposeful act. You record a scene and the bushes don't come masked, the helicopter isn't masked, Biden isn't masked -- you have to do that purposefully and at cost if you want it.
Yet Biden is masked. Why is he masked? If all you wanted to do was add the mics on top, you'd never mask Biden, there's no point, he's always supposed to be behind the mics.
Yet Biden IS masked. Which means HE is the added element here. Which not only means a green screen, but camera tracking to seamlessly insert Biden in for the pan to Marine 1. Welcome to Hollywood. The moonlanding may not have been faked, but our president is, using semi-professional open source tools that even indie filmakers have access to. This shit has been around forever.
Even anti-Q TDW people are saying they're rethinking Q, lol
So public and mainstream that MSM had to quickly start with the lame technical glitch, optical illusion, anything just stop looking!!! Reeee!
Now let TDW start hypothesizing that someone suffering that level of dementia could not cover the speeches, why is he always so well-lit, do his gestures make sense with the audio (because masks hide the mouth), still no SOTU address required by law, could they have pre-recorded his appearances, how far ahead...?
BRB, gotta reload the popcorn maker.