Anons Flashback to 2013 : Supreme Court Asks: Can Human Genes Be Patented? > if they can patent genes, and they inject mrna into people via a 'vaccine' does the vaccinated person become part of their patent property? - The Great Awakening

Anons Flashback to 2013 : Supreme Court Asks: Can Human Genes Be Patented? > if they can patent genes, and they inject mrna into people via a 'vaccine' does the vaccinated person become part of their patent property? (www.npr.org)

posted 3 years ago by ObamaSucks 3 years ago by ObamaSucks +79 / -1

19 comments

19 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (19)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– Slyver 2 points 3 years ago +3 / -1

mRNA cannot (by itself, or with anything listed in the vaccines) alter our DNA
They already own us by our Birth Certificates
If they used a technology that altered our DNA (which the vaccines do not) then I think the answer would be complicated. We may have intrinsic rights to genes we had from birth. Natural viruses may have ownership rights claims if they altered our DNA at any point. We could have multiple genes that are patented by different corporations, giving joint custody? And the big daddy in the room, all current technologies that we know of do not have the capacity (yet) to alter the genomes of all cells in our bodies. So would these custody battles only apply to those cells which have the altered genes, so like, one company could claim 2% of your bone marrow from a leukemia treatment?

I think the answer is likely no for these three reasons.

permalink save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q