From what I gather from commenters (including many anti-Q commenters) is that it just seems boring and pointless. Jim Watkins is nothing to us. What he thinks, does, or says is non-consequential. His porn addiction or whatever else, are irrelevant and don't matter. From looking at Q proofs, it is undoubtedly true that Trump was aware of Q and played a role in the posts. If someone can make a coherent argument that Q was a psyop with Trump's backing, I'm all ears. They have to actually look at the drops and admit that it's not some random thing someone in a basement did though.
From what I gather from commenters (including many anti-Q commenters) is that it just seems boring and pointless. Jim Watkins is nothing to us. What he thinks, does, or says is non-consequential. His porn addiction or whatever else, are irrelevant and don't matter. From looking at Q proofs, it is undoubtedly true that Trump was aware of Q and played a role in the posts. If someone can make a coherent argument that Q was a psyop with Trump's backing, I'm all ears. They have to actually look at the drops and admit that it's not some random thing someone in a basement did though.