(Full disclosure: I’ve watched a little over half of it, so I’ll feel dumb if this is addressed later in the film) His guest talks a lot about 2010 census data being used to create the algorithms that gave Biden the win, and how in Colorado there were more votes than population in several counties because of people moving away, dying, etc.
Where is the 2020 census and why hasn’t the data been released, in whole or in part? I realize 2020 was a whole new animal for census takers, etc because of COVID, but shouldn’t we have something by now? For comparison, 2010 census numbers were finalized and released to the president in December of the same year.
We know certain states have experienced HUGE numbers of people moving to other states; could this explain in part why New York took over a month to release their final vote counts for 2020, that their vote totals were so much more than their actual population that they had to figure out how to explain it?
I think it would very telling to overlay the 2020 votes with the 2020 census data.
It is addressed later. The reason is that if you look at the population numbers on the declining side of the peak, there are two distinct humps that appear abnormal. The population data that contains these anomalies is from 2010. A professor is interviewed who recognized the source data because it happened to be a data set he used in his classroom. Watch the rest of the documentary and it will make sense.
Awesome. The O.P. still gets a pat on the back though, for spotting this and suggesting a course of investigation.
Thanks, fren! I consider my back patted. Just trying to use my head for something other than a hat rack.
Actually, I saw that part, and was pretty much where I stopped and started thinking about this. He was showing a county in Colorado as the example of the reasoning for the actual votes exceeding the number of registered voters because of attrition that wasn’t factored into their algorithm. I would like to compare the vote totals to the actual 2020 population to see if there’s anything interesting to be revealed. Maybe I’m looking at this all wrong, but I’m trying to use my brain and be a little less like the sheeple.
In an honest election, the census should have nothing to do with the vote. It does help to potentially predict a vote count based on history.....but shouldn't delay posting vote counts. The reason it took these states so long to produce their results is because they had to manipulate the totals due to such a high voter turnout. Crooks
What I was getting at is that for those counties that lost significant percentages of their population over the past ten years, would the number of votes cast in 2020 (many of which were “fake votes”) be more than the number of eligible voters/residents NOW.
One could make a case as to why there were more registered voters in a county than there were residents. Thats sloppy county work and accountability, but that may not be criminal (it also could be).
One thing that IS criminal is having more votes cast than voters. This happens in many counties shown in that Lindell doc. There's no way to get out of explaining that...
Mineral County, CO was at the top of Frank's list of CO counties. It is a tiny county - 742 people voted for President. But the census data about eligible voters puts that number at around 690. So how can 742 people vote when there are only 690 people eligible to vote?
That is a very simple question that someone in the county should be able to explain.
What I'm hearing from your comments is that if there is a significant correlation between the 2010 census numbers and the vote totals in areas where the 2020 census shows a large decrease in population, then you could reasonably theorize that the DS used that 2010 data for their vote fraud calculations. I think this could also be used in areas where the 2020 census showed large population increases. Obviously that would allow room for excess votes but what if the votes roughly fit with the 2010 census numbers? You may need to get an actual hat rack.
https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2020/2020-demographic-analysis-estimates.html
It would appear that the Census Bureau only had estimates as of Dec. 15, 2020.
That being said, the Dems/DS most likely used 2010 data for their algorithms, as the 2020 data was not yet available.
That was exactly what Mike’s guest proved, that they DID use 2010 data, shifted forward by ten years to create the algo’s. What I’m saying is to compare the votes cast to 2020 census numbers to see if votes cast exceed the current population.
Its not available because it invalidates that vote tabulations. Duh!
I know, I can be obtuse at times. ?
LoL!
Census is bullshit anyways, its not verified information, I could say i have 40 people living in my home.
You’re not wrong, but it’s in the Constitution, so ??♀️
When the dems fought against questions about immigration status, we knew for sure it’s just another way to manipulate the redistricting.
I do know that the census was late this year (my husband was an enumerator). Was supposed to start in May, but he didn’t begin work until August. Worked through September. Was asked to continue after September to begin concentrating in homeless communities (he declined).
So - I would be the 2020 data wasn’t even compiled before year end.
I have a friend who did the same thing, and yes, things were delayed, I just wondered if they’re being further delayed because the data could reveal some inconvenient truths.
You can't find any data on the 2020 census. usually it would be out by now. but the Census Bureau still hasn't finished counting everyone yet.
The 2020 Census hadn't been completed by the time 'they' were 'working' those algorithms! How stupid can you be! The video flat out tells us all we need to know--CHEATERS!
The argument over the 2020 census is moot. When EVERY county in the state had results mirrored each other on the graphs, then the fix was in. TREASON!