Seems like we should be able readily to answer those [MSM] with TRUTH backed with evidence.
For instance,
Stating why the two previous audit were insufficient and tainted. EAC recommended auditors are unqualified and have ties to Dominion. An AZ judge is knowledgeable about this. (I have links to the stories.)
The real reasons why the forensic audit took six months to be approved. Obstruction-like tactics explained well by Shelby Busch (sp?( In. Her video about the AZ recall.
Etc.
Where did the questions they were answering come from?
My questions are more along the lines that General McInerny (sp?) wrote about. That is, the process and thoroughness description & the commitment+integrity of those auditing, etc.
I'd say the questions were from clueless people who don't know why there's an audit this long after the election, and, from people who want to doxx the auditors or discredit the efforts in some way.
My question is, why are activist reporters even allowed this close, with cameras, to the ballots? Nothing good can ever come out of a situation like this
Those are all [MSM] based narrative questions.
Seems like we should be able readily to answer those [MSM] with TRUTH backed with evidence.
For instance,
Az Central gets news from. AZ Republic, which is a left wing rag.
Isn't MSN a branch of Microsoft ... which of course is Gates.
They push woke news from what I recall.
Never heard of AZ Central.
Skimming through the article, they're basically saying that the two previous audits were on the up and up (which is bull), finding no fraud.
By inference, their position is that there was no fraud in AZ, so, the current audit is useless.
That pretty well sums up their trustworthyness. Fake news.
MSN is garbage. Pure trash.
Where did the questions they were answering come from?
My questions are more along the lines that General McInerny (sp?) wrote about. That is, the process and thoroughness description & the commitment+integrity of those auditing, etc.
I'd say the questions were from clueless people who don't know why there's an audit this long after the election, and, from people who want to doxx the auditors or discredit the efforts in some way.
AZCentral will screen all public opinion to pick what goes with the narrative.
AZCentral is a branch of Gannett newspapers, not to be trusted at all.
Started reading sounds like a bullshit CNN story not worth my time!
Just curious, we're the questions they were answering like any of your questions about the audit?
Only questions I really have about the audit are:
This article answered none of those. It tried to dismiss the fraud claims, while subtly giving a few targets for doxxing.
My question is, why are activist reporters even allowed this close, with cameras, to the ballots? Nothing good can ever come out of a situation like this
Fuck the AZ republic. Its garbage leftist bullshit.
AZCentral is the online Arizona Republic and they are DS in every way. Not your friend. Read the Epoch Times.