"Prosecutors are only able to secure a warrant only if they can convince a judge that a search is likely to produce evidence of a crime."
Oh Please!!!! let's change that to make it true: "Prosecutors can secure a warrant if they know which judge will give them one, based on who they want to harass and punish for the crime of supporting President Trump." There. Fixed it.
Obviously Rudy committed a crime based on the evidence they haven't presented yet.
Obviously they will find such evidence since he's a very incautious person, who only took down the NYC mob by pure luck, and has only had a years worth of time to prepare for this invasion he knew was coming.
Therefore such a search will "likely produce evidence of a crime" (when they plant it).
The article states,
Oh Please!!!! let's change that to make it true: "Prosecutors can secure a warrant if they know which judge will give them one, based on who they want to harass and punish for the crime of supporting President Trump." There. Fixed it.
Obviously Rudy committed a crime based on the evidence they haven't presented yet.
Obviously they will find such evidence since he's a very incautious person, who only took down the NYC mob by pure luck, and has only had a years worth of time to prepare for this invasion he knew was coming.
Therefore such a search will "likely produce evidence of a crime" (when they plant it).
I think you nailed it.
AHEM, post 1287.