Overpopulation isn't the problem. Responsible use of finite resources for all vs globalist greed for the few is the problem, and even more so irresponsible disposal of what's created out of those resources.
These sick bastards are the root reasons for all of the destructive human practices. We could have 'near' free energy. That technology is out there. We could have hyper-efficient engines...that also exists. Less fossil fuel use, less pollution. However, It's not in the best interests of the 'shareholders' of cabalic commerce. We have super-clean methods of desalinization ... We can easily, and cheaply convert sea water into fresh water, but again, that would prove in opposition to the plan. We can draw enormous amounts of energy from the sun, store it in massive capacitors for use when it's dark. We have the most abundant ready made source of resources on the planet ... they are called land fills. There is enough renewable waste in landfills to reduce destructive mining practices for 40 years. Again ... that's not in 'our' interests.
It's all bullshit. Total fucking lies and bullshit. It's not about reducing the population to save the planet. It's about removing the only free society humanity has ever known. Only then can they truly control the entire planet. We are the only thing TRULY standing in their way. We are under attack ... and 99% are too stupid to see it.
You're right, of course, but the masses still buy into the myth. That's how deep the indoctrination goes, it is accepted as "settled science." Population of any species depends on available space, food and water availability, and basic resources; thus, population is a self-correcting system. If anyone ever studies r/K Theory (https://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/the-theory/rk-selection-theory/) you can see that a predator species will not entirely eradicate a prey species in a given area, because the predators would starve; meanwhile the prey species reproduces at accelerated paces to fill the gap.
It sorta woks that way in human populations too...as a self-regulating system. Right now in the West we are enjoying copious resources, but that is not the case for the entire human history... we are a one-off.
While I agree that it COULD be done, it would take some rather totalitarian steps to MAKE it happen. As a Libertarian, I could not condone such methods.
I would argue that consciousness (the ability to reason and plan) and developing social constructs have short circuited your argument and for your argument to exist in the future, at a minimum the social construct has to be torn down. That isn't something to look forward to, but it could absolutely be coming.
The social contract has been burned and spread to the four winds. Once government no longer worked towards the Peoples interests and no longer protected the People from the anarchists and terrorists (BLM and Antifa, FBI and CIA, Facebook and Google) it became null and void.
Not true, not any more. If you search for that as a quote, it shows up in a newspaper from 1994. World population then was 5 billion something.
Population density of NYC says 27,000 per square mile, area of Texas is 268,597 square miles. The result there is 7,252,119,000. Current world population is 7.674 billion.
Imagine the sewage runoff from that. And the logistics and supply chain issues. "Could" doesn't mean "can", basically.
I'm not a fan of Georgia Guidestones etc etc but think about Africa with 4 billion people. China is at 1.3 billion and they're aggressively pushing for territory in other countries ( buying up things here also ). The situation should be managed better, overall, even if that means dictating policy to other countries, somehow, providing contraceptives as a condition of food shipments, whatever it is.
For what, instead of Texas in the quote, you mean? Doesn't change the amount of land needed for the food, or the mining, deforestation, other species going extinct, all that, to support the number of people?
It's really hard to get any stats or articles on this without running into all the globalist propaganda, but India's population is more out of control than China's right now,
the overpopulation hypothesis has been wrong many times. probably a rough time for that movie to come out lol
Overpopulation isn't the problem. Responsible use of finite resources for all vs globalist greed for the few is the problem, and even more so irresponsible disposal of what's created out of those resources.
100% agree with you Fren.
These sick bastards are the root reasons for all of the destructive human practices. We could have 'near' free energy. That technology is out there. We could have hyper-efficient engines...that also exists. Less fossil fuel use, less pollution. However, It's not in the best interests of the 'shareholders' of cabalic commerce. We have super-clean methods of desalinization ... We can easily, and cheaply convert sea water into fresh water, but again, that would prove in opposition to the plan. We can draw enormous amounts of energy from the sun, store it in massive capacitors for use when it's dark. We have the most abundant ready made source of resources on the planet ... they are called land fills. There is enough renewable waste in landfills to reduce destructive mining practices for 40 years. Again ... that's not in 'our' interests.
It's all bullshit. Total fucking lies and bullshit. It's not about reducing the population to save the planet. It's about removing the only free society humanity has ever known. Only then can they truly control the entire planet. We are the only thing TRULY standing in their way. We are under attack ... and 99% are too stupid to see it.
You're right, of course, but the masses still buy into the myth. That's how deep the indoctrination goes, it is accepted as "settled science." Population of any species depends on available space, food and water availability, and basic resources; thus, population is a self-correcting system. If anyone ever studies r/K Theory (https://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/the-theory/rk-selection-theory/) you can see that a predator species will not entirely eradicate a prey species in a given area, because the predators would starve; meanwhile the prey species reproduces at accelerated paces to fill the gap.
It sorta woks that way in human populations too...as a self-regulating system. Right now in the West we are enjoying copious resources, but that is not the case for the entire human history... we are a one-off.
For that we would need a new energy source. One that is cheap to produce and clean. One that is nearly unlimited.
And the Navy filed a patent on just that recently.
Not to mention something like zero point energy. Energy taken directly from the vacuum of space.
While I agree that it COULD be done, it would take some rather totalitarian steps to MAKE it happen. As a Libertarian, I could not condone such methods.
I would argue that consciousness (the ability to reason and plan) and developing social constructs have short circuited your argument and for your argument to exist in the future, at a minimum the social construct has to be torn down. That isn't something to look forward to, but it could absolutely be coming.
The social contract has been burned and spread to the four winds. Once government no longer worked towards the Peoples interests and no longer protected the People from the anarchists and terrorists (BLM and Antifa, FBI and CIA, Facebook and Google) it became null and void.
Its not wrong. The elite could very much want less people for the sole reason of conveince and not a need
georgia guidestones much?
Yup. You could fit the entire world population in texas if they lived with the same population density of nyc.
Not true, not any more. If you search for that as a quote, it shows up in a newspaper from 1994. World population then was 5 billion something.
Population density of NYC says 27,000 per square mile, area of Texas is 268,597 square miles. The result there is 7,252,119,000. Current world population is 7.674 billion.
Imagine the sewage runoff from that. And the logistics and supply chain issues. "Could" doesn't mean "can", basically.
I'm not a fan of Georgia Guidestones etc etc but think about Africa with 4 billion people. China is at 1.3 billion and they're aggressively pushing for territory in other countries ( buying up things here also ). The situation should be managed better, overall, even if that means dictating policy to other countries, somehow, providing contraceptives as a condition of food shipments, whatever it is.
Alright so like india then
For what, instead of Texas in the quote, you mean? Doesn't change the amount of land needed for the food, or the mining, deforestation, other species going extinct, all that, to support the number of people?
It's really hard to get any stats or articles on this without running into all the globalist propaganda, but India's population is more out of control than China's right now,
https://ourworldindata.org/world-population-growth#population-growth-by-country
World population graph,
https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2018/11/Annual-World-Population-since-10-thousand-BCE-for-OWID-800x498.png
Deer population graph, how things usually go when something breeds out of control and eats everything in sight,
http://www.uwyo.edu/dbmcd/popecol/janlects/Fig2.1deer.jpg
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23901632/
https://www.agweb.com/news/crops/crop-production/phosphorus-time-bomb-agriculture-myth-and-reality
It’s an Amazon series, they made it for this pandemic. Arrogant arsholes