I've just fallen face-first down a rabbit hole. To be honest, I don't really know what I've stumbled across, but it's odd enough and strange enough to grab my attention. All that I have right now are the puzzle pieces. I don't know how to put them together, if they even CAN be put together. I submit this for your review. Perhaps someone else can make sense of them.
- IBM has been working on a quantum computer. The online articles suggest that it is only in its infancy. I suspect it's much farther along than is being admitted to:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ibm_research_zurich/albums/72157663611181258
https://i.redd.it/cepfsmnx4sy01.jpg
- I've known about the existence of this computer for awhile now. What I didn't know was that CERN was involved with it:
https://www.ibm.com/blogs/research/2019/03/cern-ibm-quantum/
- The question I have is, what is CERN up to? I've run across some interesting websites, some seem plausible and other seem really out there. One project, "Awake," caught my eye, for obvious reasons:
https://agenda.infn.it/event/7409/contributions/67581/attachments/49018/57963/petrenko.pdf
Plasma acceleration: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_acceleration
10 mind-blowing facts about the CERN Large Collider you need to know: https://www.rt.com/op-ed/313922-cern-collider-hadron-higgs/
- Now, here are the really off-the-wall claims:
https://newspunch.com/cern-physicist-we-have-done-something-evil-it-is-being-hidden/
http://www.scienceinfo.news/physicist-disappears-mini-black-hole-created-cern-particle-accelerator/
Whether any of these claims are true, are strictly fabrications, or just misdirection, I don't know. It's hard to know what to believe any more. But, generally-speaking, where there's smoke, there's usually fire.
First, I agree with your sentiment where people use terms that show that they don't really understand the topic. It is definitely grating, and particularly frustrating when explaining the problems with the claims gets treated as shilling.
Now, CERN is one that I do not possess any real knowledge beyond the sales pitch. So, don't treat this as calling BS, but the way you use the term "conspiracy theory" really isn't doing any favors for yourself and for the same reason.
11 - I've seen many times where people confuse gravity with electromagnetism. Misapplication of the terms really highlights people that know just enough to get themselves in trouble with people who do know.
14 - the string theorists have run the math and have concluded a certain specific number of dimensions. However, it could really be mental masturbation since there isn't really any way to test these things. I do believe the mysticism types use the jargon specifically to create their own meaning as you describe.
17 - this response is the most shilly of your comments. Particularly given that this is the worlds biggest machine, put together by a global group of physicists, funded by deep state and somehow you expect us to believe that the choice of symbols they use to apply to the project are just arbitrary and not something that was run through multiple iterations and teams of people trying to create the correct representation. Do you also think it is coincidence about all the rest of these symbols have secondary and tertiary occultic meanings?
18 - clever, plausible, but runs contrary to the rest of the symbolism that you chose to brush aside.