In theory, yes, however the problem is that the spike protein itself seems to be responsible for the blood clotting in all sorts of organs in vaccinated people [and also animals according to the ferret studies of original SARS-COV vaccine trials (early 2000's) and some post trial analysis from labs (around 2013],
probably depending on things like diabetes, cholesterol, weight & other things that affect the cardiovascular system which aren't really being taken into account before vaccinations.
Add to the mix that also, its unclear but somewhat likely that spike protein is able to bind to some receptor in woman's womb and in male sperm if it manages to enter those related tissues, Potentially causing many negative effects (heavy menstrual bleeding, no menstruation, miscarriage, STERILITY!?) which some older studies and recent reports are suggesting IS maybe actually happening.
Now that's potentially a BIG problem for those who get vaccinated and IMO that's their problem but now with the shedding aspect, adds danger and possible risk for unvaccinated people who have been reportedly suffering similar kinds of symptoms and injuries. (one poor vaccinated woman lost her 5mnth old baby) presumably because the spike protein is being shed and contracted by those around them through sex, touch, being in close proximity or in the case of the poor baby, passed on through breastmilk.
That's my understanding of the current situation, now there ARE some pretty big questions we don't know the answers to that need answering to assess the real risk this poses.
here are a couple i can think of right now,
How long do vaccinated people continue to produce spike protein internally and therefore remain potential shedders?
weeks, months, years... forever? if the spike protein is still created long after you develop antibodies, wont the antibodies be perpetually attacking the cells producing spike protein effectively giving you an auto immune disease?
Does spike protein contracted by person B have the ability to deliver mRNA to cells?
(i don't think it does but if that's a yes, then we're in trouble)
In theory, yes, however the problem is that the spike protein itself seems to be responsible for the blood clotting in all sorts of organs in vaccinated people [and also animals according to the ferret studies of original SARS-COV vaccine trials (early 2000's) and some post trial analysis from labs (around 2013], probably depending on things like diabetes, cholesterol, weight & other things that affect the cardiovascular system which aren't really being taken into account before vaccinations. Add to the mix that also, its unclear but somewhat likely that spike protein is able to bind to some receptor in woman's womb and in male sperm if it manages to enter those related tissues, Potentially causing many negative effects (heavy menstrual bleeding, no menstruation, miscarriage, STERILITY!?) which some older studies and recent reports are suggesting IS maybe actually happening.
Now that's potentially a BIG problem for those who get vaccinated and IMO that's their problem but now with the shedding aspect, adds danger and possible risk for unvaccinated people who have been reportedly suffering similar kinds of symptoms and injuries. (one poor vaccinated woman lost her 5mnth old baby) presumably because the spike protein is being shed and contracted by those around them through sex, touch, being in close proximity or in the case of the poor baby, passed on through breastmilk.
That's my understanding of the current situation, now there ARE some pretty big questions we don't know the answers to that need answering to assess the real risk this poses.
here are a couple i can think of right now,
How long do vaccinated people continue to produce spike protein internally and therefore remain potential shedders? weeks, months, years... forever? if the spike protein is still created long after you develop antibodies, wont the antibodies be perpetually attacking the cells producing spike protein effectively giving you an auto immune disease?
Does spike protein contracted by person B have the ability to deliver mRNA to cells? (i don't think it does but if that's a yes, then we're in trouble)
this shit is so crazy.