to be fair, kirk did sacrificed HIMSELF, the individual chose to die, sometimes,yes the need of the many CAN outweight the few, however, it is no one's right to sacrifice someone else, that is the caveat, the point of this phrase is to call forth self sacrifice, however they had missed the point that the individual is to self sacrifice, willingly , out of necessity, out of duty, and out of love for something greater than himself,noble sentiment, but difficult to pull off.
the left took over nobility, saying they hold it, don't let them sully something good again, like the idea of the hero, they don't deserve to have ownership of self sacrifice.
to be fair, kirk did sacrificed HIMSELF, the individual chose to die, sometimes,yes the need of the many CAN outweight the few, however, it is no one's right to sacrifice someone else, that is the caveat, the point of this phrase is to call forth self sacrifice, however they had missed the point that the individual is to self sacrifice, willingly , out of necessity, out of duty, and out of love for something greater than himself,noble sentiment, but difficult to pull off.
the left took over nobility, saying they hold it, don't let them sully something good again, like the idea of the hero, they don't deserve to have ownership of self sacrifice.