Think about it. Biden isn't replacing all the Trump appointees, demonstrating he has no power. Even if he had, we could just leak it all in a plausibly deniable fashion (it's unclassified, what would the punishment be?). We're intentionally not leaking it.
"Another two weeks, right?". It's not about dates, it's about markers.
" 'Soon', since 2017." All the information dropped followed markers, or date deltas (where there are events with immovable dates that gate future events). "Soon" didn't mean "soon after this post was made". And compared to the pace of change for the past 50 years, "soon" is pretty accurate.
The other audits couldn't happen until the Maricopa audit finished, and the military can't step in until the other audits happen. The mistake you're making is thinking that declas is to support the military stepping in. They purposely don't want to declas anything until 1) Antifa/BLM hold the nation hostage demanding a new election at gunpoint, 2) the DNC commits to a candidate, 3) at the last minute leaked/declassified dirt tanks their candidate the same way we did to Biden and HRC. If we put all our cards on the table now, we're wasting all our ammo, they will just choose a different candidate that doesn't have dirt. We need them to commit to a candidate and run them into the end zone.
Think about all the resignations happening right now. The corrupt insiders are getting ready to reduce the impact of declas by stepping down to make the evidence irrelevant. From "confessions of a forum shill": "This too I learned was one of their techniques: always be on the move, always retire old alts and create new ones, always be making old evidence against your irrelevant."
Trump did declassify everything. Timing is everything. You'll see very soon what they were waiting for.
"soon". since 2017
Not much President Trump could do when they refused to release the classified data, or they redacted most of it out.
2 more weeks right
Think about it. Biden isn't replacing all the Trump appointees, demonstrating he has no power. Even if he had, we could just leak it all in a plausibly deniable fashion (it's unclassified, what would the punishment be?). We're intentionally not leaking it.
"Another two weeks, right?". It's not about dates, it's about markers.
" 'Soon', since 2017." All the information dropped followed markers, or date deltas (where there are events with immovable dates that gate future events). "Soon" didn't mean "soon after this post was made". And compared to the pace of change for the past 50 years, "soon" is pretty accurate.
The other audits couldn't happen until the Maricopa audit finished, and the military can't step in until the other audits happen. The mistake you're making is thinking that declas is to support the military stepping in. They purposely don't want to declas anything until 1) Antifa/BLM hold the nation hostage demanding a new election at gunpoint, 2) the DNC commits to a candidate, 3) at the last minute leaked/declassified dirt tanks their candidate the same way we did to Biden and HRC. If we put all our cards on the table now, we're wasting all our ammo, they will just choose a different candidate that doesn't have dirt. We need them to commit to a candidate and run them into the end zone.
Think about all the resignations happening right now. The corrupt insiders are getting ready to reduce the impact of declas by stepping down to make the evidence irrelevant. From "confessions of a forum shill": "This too I learned was one of their techniques: always be on the move, always retire old alts and create new ones, always be making old evidence against your irrelevant."
Why would BLM want a new election? They got old Joe
And what's a new election for? If Trump won the last one not sure why we need another one.
That's what the military proposed in Myanmar to make the CCP paid protestors look unhinged for calling it a coup.