Bot, Shill, and Hater comments can be found below, LMAO!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
I agree with the general sentiment but there seems to a misunderstanding regarding what Bitcoin is and does. Bitcoin is an open ledger, its security is derived from everyone being able to see the transactions. There are “privacy coins” that are most likely honey pots but Bitcoin and similar open ledger cryptos don’t offer privacy. They offer a potential decoupling from the nwo banking elite. Whether or not the sec and the fed start clamping down on exchanges and limit the potentially destabilizing force that de-fi represents has yet to be seen. Whether or not Bitcoins inventor is going to appear out of the wood work and gut the whole project taking with him billions of dollars is yet to be seen. Either way, blockchain tech represents a way to make transactions of all kinds more transparent not more private. If you want privacy use cash or physical assets. Anything digital is inherently insecure and everyone knows it
In the end Bitcoin is supposed to be an asset coin not a transaction coin it wasn't developed for that, and other cryptos are created for transactions so why would you use Bitcoin which is definitely archaic compared to the other designs? They just want to move large amounts of value around, that's all it's good for.
You can move large amounts of money around and bypass the SMART infrastructure with any crypto, the appeal of Bitcoin is that as long as satoshi doesn’t show up and dump his coins than the amount of Bitcoin available is fixed and therefor non inflationary. Either way, all transactions are public so it’s not particularly useful for money laundering