They have a name for it. They call it “Covid Strokes”
? These people are sick! ?
I own a commercial roofing company. We’re small around 20 employees. One of my foreman just found out yesterday that his 49 year old wife has had a stroke. She’s in ICU and needs some prayers. As my foreman was talking with one of the nurses working on his wife the nurse told him that they’ve been seeing a lot of this happen lately and call it “Covid Strokes”. Our office manager’s dad also had a stroke a week after getting the jab. I now know more people who’ve had strokes from the Vax then people who died from the Rona. It’s so common that they have a name for it...... let that sink in...”Covid Strokes”
I wouldn't condemn all that take the vaccine as "Sheeple" with mindless beliefs that deserve punishment.
A lot of people are doing it in a effort to stay employed. It's all good and well for people to smirk and judge those who do it for that reason, but there are a lot of people that face genuine poverty if they lose their job.
Not only that, but I find it interesting that whilst people hold the belief that you should give up your job/career in order to not take the vax, they also hold the belief that everyone currently unemployed is a lazy slob grifting for "Stimmys".
*For example, those in the medical field who refuse will have their shifts cut. That's a career that takes lot of sweat equity to work in. If they're deemed a "resister" that also limits their ability to find other work. So, what do they do? Capitulate and get the jab and be deemed a sheep who deserves what happens or reject and lose their job (as shown with the Houston case, the legal system is not prepared to help) and in turn require government assistance?
Some people are not taking jobs that require them to get vaxed. In turn, they're out of work and need some money to continue to survive. They require the government to assist in that. Yet if they take the vax and die/become incapacitated, it's also their fault for capitulating?
This reasoning lacks a lot of critical thought and understanding.
A straw man argument combined with a false dichotomy, plus criticism of a lack of "critical thought and understanding" thrown in at the end for good measure.
I'm too lazy to respond in depth, so a short "blow it out your ass" is all it is worth.