This is the WHO deploying the "plausible deniability" card.
First, then imply that everyone needs to be "vaccinated" ASAP then, quietly, they slip in a proviso that many will miss but which they will be able to point to later on and say "we told you so!"
It's the plausible deniability card but I think there may also be another reason for it.
When over 70s were getting the vaccine and dying a few days later, it was easy to explain it away as a coincidence. Even with over 50s it was possible to use the 'coincidence, not related' excuse, because normie sheep are completely brainwashed. However, when 13 year olds start dying a few days after getting the vaccine, even normie sheep start to ask questions. They don't want the sheep waking up, and kids dying would inevitably start a mass awakening.
I agree, and something similar has already happened with pregnant women.
AFAIK, the vaccine was never recommended or approved for pregnant women, yet doctors and “experts” across the country insist they should be vaccinated.
As more info comes out about the high miscarriage rate, nobody will ever really be held accountable because the official guidance was “don’t vax if pregnant” and yet the doctors can all say “we were told to do so and everyone else was doing it”.
And mark my words - at some point (barring mass trials in the Great Awakening) the MSM narrative will shift from “trust the science and get your jab” to “it was an experimental vaccine from Trump and it was your own fault for taking it, nobody can force you to get it”.
And the people hurt most will be the normies who innocently trusted the institutions they thought were there to protect them, as is always the case.
My sons friend (23 year old female) had the vaccine 7 days ago, has had a miscarriage within 4 days and had to go to the doctor today as she has chest pains. This whole thing is horrific.
Trump did promote the vaccine. He should have listened to actual experts instead of pharma shills. Had he kept promoting other treatments and pointed out the PCR cycle and death rate scams he would be in a great “I told you so” position. Instead he went along with the normie narrative.
I don’t disagree, but at the same time this extends far beyond Trump’s job.
Basically, his job was to remove needless bureaucracy to the development of the vaccine, and make sure it was available to those who want to take the chance.
Kind of like the very important “right to try” stuff he did.
And he did that. None of us liked Fauci, but few knew how he had his hands in all the cookie jars at once back then.
In an environment where we didn’t have much to lose by trying, Trump set a goal and drew a line for when we could open up when nobody else was, AND he played the media by getting them to turn against the vaccines before they became for them (which is still a card to be played, IMO).
Where I fault Trump is for continuing to mention the vaccines today with all the facts we know now.
The cabal’s plan was to lockdown the economy until 2025 and then roll out a “FDA-approved vaccine” that would be mandatory since they could rationalize that they had time to test it. Trump telling them, ‘I got yer vaccine right here pal!’ threw a big monkey wrench in their plans. Now here we are, refusing the vaxx, walking around freely without masks, and patiently waiting for the globalists to be washed away in the storm.
This is similar to way msm screams Orange Man Bad stories from rooftops claiming shit he didn’t do, then later puts in retractions or corrections on page 16 in small print etc so they don’t get sued for libel.
I can’t stand that “out” for publishers, it needs to change. “Knowingly” making the front page be the desired narrative, then cover their ass with page 16 small print months later.
This is the WHO deploying the "plausible deniability" card.
First, then imply that everyone needs to be "vaccinated" ASAP then, quietly, they slip in a proviso that many will miss but which they will be able to point to later on and say "we told you so!"
Totally agree, otherwise this would be on every news network.
It's the plausible deniability card but I think there may also be another reason for it.
When over 70s were getting the vaccine and dying a few days later, it was easy to explain it away as a coincidence. Even with over 50s it was possible to use the 'coincidence, not related' excuse, because normie sheep are completely brainwashed. However, when 13 year olds start dying a few days after getting the vaccine, even normie sheep start to ask questions. They don't want the sheep waking up, and kids dying would inevitably start a mass awakening.
Excellent point, fren.
I don't think WHO has turned around and actually decide to act in the best interests of the people.
They are realizing that it is only a matter of time before the normies find out how the vaccine is riskier for their children than the Wuhan Virus is.
I agree, and something similar has already happened with pregnant women.
AFAIK, the vaccine was never recommended or approved for pregnant women, yet doctors and “experts” across the country insist they should be vaccinated.
As more info comes out about the high miscarriage rate, nobody will ever really be held accountable because the official guidance was “don’t vax if pregnant” and yet the doctors can all say “we were told to do so and everyone else was doing it”.
And mark my words - at some point (barring mass trials in the Great Awakening) the MSM narrative will shift from “trust the science and get your jab” to “it was an experimental vaccine from Trump and it was your own fault for taking it, nobody can force you to get it”.
And the people hurt most will be the normies who innocently trusted the institutions they thought were there to protect them, as is always the case.
LOL when they blame Trump again.
My sons friend (23 year old female) had the vaccine 7 days ago, has had a miscarriage within 4 days and had to go to the doctor today as she has chest pains. This whole thing is horrific.
Trump did promote the vaccine. He should have listened to actual experts instead of pharma shills. Had he kept promoting other treatments and pointed out the PCR cycle and death rate scams he would be in a great “I told you so” position. Instead he went along with the normie narrative.
I’m torn on this.
I don’t disagree, but at the same time this extends far beyond Trump’s job.
Basically, his job was to remove needless bureaucracy to the development of the vaccine, and make sure it was available to those who want to take the chance.
Kind of like the very important “right to try” stuff he did.
And he did that. None of us liked Fauci, but few knew how he had his hands in all the cookie jars at once back then.
In an environment where we didn’t have much to lose by trying, Trump set a goal and drew a line for when we could open up when nobody else was, AND he played the media by getting them to turn against the vaccines before they became for them (which is still a card to be played, IMO).
Where I fault Trump is for continuing to mention the vaccines today with all the facts we know now.
The cabal’s plan was to lockdown the economy until 2025 and then roll out a “FDA-approved vaccine” that would be mandatory since they could rationalize that they had time to test it. Trump telling them, ‘I got yer vaccine right here pal!’ threw a big monkey wrench in their plans. Now here we are, refusing the vaxx, walking around freely without masks, and patiently waiting for the globalists to be washed away in the storm.
This is similar to way msm screams Orange Man Bad stories from rooftops claiming shit he didn’t do, then later puts in retractions or corrections on page 16 in small print etc so they don’t get sued for libel.
I can’t stand that “out” for publishers, it needs to change. “Knowingly” making the front page be the desired narrative, then cover their ass with page 16 small print months later.