392
Comments (55)
sorted by:
51
StickToThePlan [S] 51 points ago +51 / -0

That risk-benefit analysis just doesn't add up especially since the 1 or 2 deaths would likely not be in that age bracket.

So ~60 boys will develop this heart condition to save 1 or 2 people who are likely in a nursing home?

You know the rate is 10x higher than reported and the deaths are probably 10x over reported

16
Based_in_Space 16 points ago +16 / -0

So Clown World. Got it.

13
HeartofStone 13 points ago +13 / -0

Those kids will now have a dramatically shortened life and will suffer from heart problems. My mother had myocarditis in her early 30s and died of sudden cardiac death at 46. Had heart problems until the day she died of a heart problem.

5
DrMcCoy 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes, the heart is damaged and will never been the same.

10
StickToThePlan [S] 10 points ago +10 / -0

Here is the link to the slideshow this came from. It's been seen here before, but looking back over this slide I just realized the implications

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2021-06/05-COVID-Wallace-508.pdf

Share this slide with everyone you know who has kids

1
_thorn_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

May just be me but i'm getting an error ?

1
TheConservationist 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's been pulled.

Have backed it up here:

https://files.catbox.moe/6yiym5.pdf

3
AI_ML_Expert 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's a slide towards the end that states there is no alternative to the mRNA vaccine as well

1
MysteriousCheese 1 point ago +1 / -0

Herd immunity got deleted bro

1
AI_ML_Expert 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's no mention of Ivermectin

2
INK11 2 points ago +2 / -0

They'll never mention Ivermectin. It's cheap and it works.

2
AI_ML_Expert 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree. Nonetheless, they omitted it in a document that can eventually be scrutinized by a court to demonstrate negligence.

41
Emyrylde 41 points ago +41 / -0

Ahh but now those 60 or so boys are now lifetime patients.....

13
SurelyShirley 13 points ago +13 / -0

There it is!

4
Darwyn 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep, if they can't kill them they will turn them into lifetime cash cows that they can profit from.

2
AngelCole 2 points ago +2 / -0

They aren't the only ones. Think of all those patients coming to the hospital with all kinds of adverse effects of the jab not knowing they are the effects. They just think they're having a stroke or heart attack as if they would any other time. I've seen an elderly patient come in hours after the jab unable to walk due to shaking/tremors and being released on new medications for seizures, there's your cash cow.

3
blacksmith21 3 points ago +3 / -0

Return on investment

-4
Patriot_Perks -4 points ago +2 / -6

I'm pretty certain myocarditis can and usually does resolve itself. Still not worth the risk to that age group, but I don't think developing mycarditis means you're among the walking dead.

11
Hodar 11 points ago +11 / -0

"Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle (myocardium). The inflammation of the heart muscle causes degeneration or death of heart muscle cells. Myocarditis has many different causes and can result in a range of outcomes from mild (presenting briefly and resolving) to rapidly progressing fatal disease. "

The question is "Why did they develop Mycocarditis?" The answer appears to be that the mRNA vaccine causes your RNA to "learn" to add spike proteins to your RNA, which causes heart inflamation, and blood clotting (ie. strokes). It's not likely going to go away, and many teenagers are already dead. Some say it's an accident, others say it's all according to the plan.

7
HeartofStone 7 points ago +7 / -0

It goes away, but the heart is left damaged. My mom had it in her 30s. Had heart problems for the rest of her life until she died of sudden cardiac death at 46.

5
Awakened 5 points ago +5 / -0

No it doesn’t. It doesn’t go away. Couple of uncles, cousins, and an aunt with it. It’s like herpes. It may recess for periods, but it comes back roaring. Those poor boys have arrived at destination fucked. Hopefully, unlike their dumb ass parents, they won’t trust the tv going forward.

1
Patriot_Perks 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s really sad for them.

31
deleted 31 points ago +31 / -0
7
LoobintheToobin 7 points ago +7 / -0

Reminds me of this Testimony of press ignoring victims Video: https://patriots.win/p/12j03rav4D/the-vaccine-is-dangerous-from-an/c/ 12:15 horrific miscarriage described. Bloody with brain spilt in half, mother vaccinated a month prior. Explains how people don’t report these to vaers because they were told it’s safe and can’t accept it not being safe as an option. Many adverse events in the clinical trials were “oddly delayed” Link to whole discussion: https://www.bitchute.com/video/TH2HAmTp40xq/

The people saved ratio over time gets real ugly with these numbers you showcase. Great point!

18
MasterRaider 18 points ago +18 / -0

In what universe were 215 males under 17 going to the hospital for Covid? That real number is faaaaar closer to 0 than to 215.

9
MasterRaider 9 points ago +9 / -0

Just noticed that they also said it prevents 2 deaths of boys under 17. Also bullshit.

1
redhawk 1 point ago +1 / -0

likely this was the most they thought they could fluff up the numbers

12
MikelovesTrump 12 points ago +12 / -0

This is huge!!!!!!

They’re telling us the real infection rate is only 8500/million. They’re admitting the virus is a fucking joke.

5
LoobintheToobin 5 points ago +5 / -0

Ooo someone noticed something they weren’t supposed to... sly smirk hehehehe wise eyes you have

9
sidhe007 9 points ago +9 / -0

How can they possibly know how many cases were prevented? Wouldn't you need a crystal ball to predict who was going to get covid in order for it to be prevented?

2
Based_in_Space 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes. Or they make a guess based on assumptions. Many predictions are wrong.

9
Sugartree2 9 points ago +10 / -1

Yup. Hidden in plain sight.

8
numina18 8 points ago +8 / -0

I don't know what kind of statistics these are, but - oh, wait. These must be those "damned statistics."

7
SurelyShirley 7 points ago +7 / -0

Or lies. Or damned lies.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
LoobintheToobin 3 points ago +3 / -0

The devils priests sure are at least: Satanic temple suing texas over abortion being their religious right. https://thesatanictemple.com/pages/texas-lawsuit “a ceremonial affirmation of self-worth and bodily autonomy that integrates the abortive process” Considering the aborted babies used in vaccine creation what does the ceremony of saving oneself using abortion really mean to God?

7
JackANorey 7 points ago +7 / -0

Of which 4 in 10 will die, so unless my maths is way out they killing 28 boys to save 2 pensioners?

5
OdieOD 5 points ago +5 / -0

How and who is keeping track of "Hospitalizations Prevented"?

"He'd have been put in the hospital if it weren't for us!" checks box

Maybe I'm sleepy, but I don't get it haha

5
LoobintheToobin 5 points ago +5 / -0

Trying to make bad numbers look good. The Horror

I recall “if it saves even one life it’s worth it”

Risk assessment ratio falls flat: June 21 2021: The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations—We Should Rethink the Policy https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/693/htm Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination.

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/cdc-hold-emergency-meeting-after-100s-suffer-heart-inflammation-following-covid-vaccines “Of note, of these 528 reports after second dose with symptom onset within 30 days, over half of them were in these younger age groups, 12–24 years old, whereas roughly 9 percent of total doses administered were in those age groups, so we “clearly have an imbalance there,” he added later.” “Data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink, which comes from nine healthcare groups that have collectively administered over 8.8 million doses—only some 284,000 of those have been given to 12- to 17-year-olds—did not indicate safety concerns, with just 60 myocarditis or pericarditis events reported through May 29” That’s a 1 in 4733 change of getting myocarditis for such young ones not at risk of covid at all. And that’s if we believe the reported numbers. Assuming the 1% under-reported aspect the odds shift to 1 in 47

4
worldowedexplanation 4 points ago +4 / -0

What’s insane is they still recommend the 2nd dose even AFTER you get myocarditis. This vaccine is absolutely designed to kill people. The CDC is killing American citizens.

2
FlyingScotzman 2 points ago +2 / -0

It means it's working.

2
xchainlinkx 2 points ago +2 / -0

Got a link to the CDC page?

8
1
xchainlinkx 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sweet. Cheers!

0
FlyingScotzman 0 points ago +1 / -1

does it say how severe the myocarditis is?

2
ifififififokiedokie 2 points ago +2 / -0

And no comment about long term effects, or life years lost?

Sorry, but a few 90 year olds dying from a cold/flu happens every day... If I were 80 I'd rather step aside and let a 16 year old have a good heart for life.

Sick world.

2
BecauseYoudBeInJail 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not shown: Those 1-2 deaths saved are 350lb diabetic 13yo Warhammer players one Ding Dong away from ringing the bell anyhow

2
Smeg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Predictions don't mean shit.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ItCameOutOfACan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thata one in a million, as shown.

1
prometheus_xiii 1 point ago +2 / -1

Jesus Christ they really like to rub it in your face that their killing your children. I wonder how the staitistican that ran these numbers sleeps at night.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0