It's not hard to see through Tucker's bullshit. He's the king of outrage, but intentionally misplaced outrage. Instead of educating his viewer on valuable matters, it's always redirected anger, carrying the viewer away from the real story. Videos of some hypocritical bullshit that some professor at an elite university spouted instead of election fraud. Look here, not there.

The New York Times ran a story this week, claiming Tucker to be a major source, and all but admitting that he crafted the anti-Trump narrative in the mainstream media. How many times, I wonder, has Tucker been their "unnamed source?"

And I also wonder what line he crossed that caused them to run this specific piece in the first place.

Here's a link to the Times' article: https://web.archive.org/web/20210621011027/https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/20/business/media/tucker-carlson.html