? 82% of pregnant women who took mRNA vaccine had miscarriage ?
(www.lifesitenews.com)
?️ STAT DEBATABLE LOL ?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (148)
sorted by:
Or, like a functional fucking adult, you can link to the actual study (https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed) which is publicly available and free to read, and realize the author is fake and gay and that the unnamed oncologist is a figment of her imagination.
No, it are not 827 total women who are pregnant in the study. It are 3958 women, who are pregnant in the study. 827 is the number of women who had ended their pregnancy in the sample time window of the study (Vaccinated between february 28 and march 30), natural or otherwise.
so it is actually 104 of 1224 pregnancies. Research is hard.
The data they gathered on spontaneous abortions was from the women (827) who's pregnancies ended within the study window. Since that is the case, then it is correct in saying 104/827 had spontaneous abortions.
The misrepresented data is that 96 of these 104 spontaneous abortions occurred in the 1st trimester which is much greater than the usual percentage of spontaneous abortions occurring in the 1st trimester vs the 2nd and 3rd. The 1st trimester is critical as this is where organogenesis occurs, and drugs (both pharm and rec) have the most effect on the fetal development. Source: yuuge med fag.
Look up colers past, comments, is a shill. Do not interact with. *And if he's not a shill, he's not a good person anyway... so regardless.
I rarely see shills hitting threads so hard on this site.
The fertility issue with the vaxes is clearly one of the things the cabal is most determined to hide.
exactly
Not really tho? out of the 30% of pregnancies that miscarry, 19% fail after the 5th week, 9% after the 7th week, 2.5% after the 10th week and only 1.3% after the 13th week. So assuming those in the periconception stage just flew under the radar, a 96/8 ratio is kinda what you'd expect. Rounded to the accepted average of 19/1.3 we are looking at a 8.3% ratio versus a 5.8% ratio. This might actually be caused by the shock of the vaccine (it would've been helpful had they included more cross statistics about whether the miscarriages also had full-body adverse events), but it might simply be due to a relatively small population (it is after al not much outside of the expected variance you would expect with such a small sample), or a skewed window of observation that probably missed an few cases.
so you think 17% miscarriages in the 3rd trimester is normal? I haven't done much digging, but a simple google search says it is not.
I looked up the first two authors of the actual paper.
https://www.eventscribe.com/2018/NFIDFallCVC/ajaxcalls/PresenterInfo.asp?efp=SUhOV09EUVQ0MjE2&PresenterID=491468&rnd=2.500141E-02%20h%0D
https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/iccfasd/iccfasd-members/shin-y-kim-cdc
What's fake and gay about the authors? The article doesn't matter. Look at the paper. The oncologist's opinion doesn't matter, the facts do, and the facts line up exactly with what the article states.
Show me proof that the paper is not legitimate.
sorry, very obvious shill you are, read carefully:
"Spontaneous abortion is the loss of pregnancy naturally before twenty weeks of gestation. Colloquially, spontaneous abortion is referred to as a 'miscarriage' to avoid association with induced abortion."
Important part of table 4: "†Data on pregnancy loss are based on 827 participants in the v-safe pregnancy registry who received an mRNA Covid-19 vaccine (BNT162b2 [Pfizer–BioNTech] or mRNA-1273 [Moderna]) from December 14, 2020, to February 28, 2021, and who reported a completed pregnancy. A total of 700 participants (84.6%) received their first eligible dose in the third trimester."
And so when you link the definition of spontaneous abortion with the data, that means the 700 pregnant women who received their first eligible dose in the third trimester, it is impossible for them to have a spontaneous abortion, because this only occurs within the first 20 weeks of pregnancy.
So then we have 127 eligible women left who have the possibility to have a spontaneous abortion, and 104 of those 127 women had spontaneous abortions. Unless they labeled terms incorrectly, that does look like 104 out of 127 eligible pregnant women in their first trimester experienced spontaneous abortion or "miscarriage". The other 700 women can't even have a spontaneous abortion, and the author of the article rightfully says they might as well have been 700 men.
Again. this is what happens when you read a single fucking graph instead of the entire article. The sample size is 3987. all of them were vaccinated, as it was one of the 2 selection criteria. Out of these 3987, 827 saw their pregnancy end within the window of observation. Out of these 827, 700 belonged to the third trimester group (Which took up 1019 of the initial sample), and the rest belonged to the second and first trimester group (These being 1714 and 1224 respectively). So, 70% of the people in the third trimester saw their pregnancy end, while only .46% of the second semester group and 7.8% of the first trimester. So the number is 8.2%.
Don't ask me where the remaining 23 of the 127 went to, because I have no idea. I can only presume they either got a normal abortion, or were at the very end of the second trimester and gave birth towards the end of the observation window.
so I am reading your take, is the amount of miscarries in the 3rd trimester not alarming to you? I see a lot of energy focussed on proving another anon wrong, but what is your take on the study?
Agreed with your response. Also first trimester miscarriages are way more common Before week 12, I wonder how many were weeks 13-20 Vs before 12 weeks.
Either way the number of third trimester to have success only at 70% is definitely below the average success at that point of the pregnancy