Did you watch the video? The issue is not the stripper part, it's the money laundering part and using her campaign funds to enrich herself and the fact that NOBODY else looked in to Klacik's background or, if they did, they kept it under wraps to use for their own purposes.
The background is an interesting question, isn't it? If the liberal media found some dirt on a Republican candidate would they normally sit on it?
My guess is that they would enjoy exposing all the dirt so it makes me wonder why that did not happen in this case. Or are people recognised as RINOs right from the start and so are left alone by the MSM?
It also makes me wonder just how orchestrated politics is. Or is it all just for show. The Romans had the "bread and circuses" idea. I wonder if Congress is just one of the circus shows?
bingo. she was a 'project' from the start. i thought she was entertaining but she didnt say much of anything at cpac - once you heard her try to articulate some conservative principles she was like a fish out of water. too bad but its a good lesson for us all
The investigation she did was easy-Peasy if you can navigate a SOS website and know a little corporate law. That excludes about 75% of our population but I digress.
Did you watch the video? The issue is not the stripper part, it's the money laundering part and using her campaign funds to enrich herself and the fact that NOBODY else looked in to Klacik's background or, if they did, they kept it under wraps to use for their own purposes.
The background is an interesting question, isn't it? If the liberal media found some dirt on a Republican candidate would they normally sit on it?
My guess is that they would enjoy exposing all the dirt so it makes me wonder why that did not happen in this case. Or are people recognised as RINOs right from the start and so are left alone by the MSM?
It also makes me wonder just how orchestrated politics is. Or is it all just for show. The Romans had the "bread and circuses" idea. I wonder if Congress is just one of the circus shows?
That makes me curious as well, why didn't we hear some of this stuff from Kim's democrat opponent?
Controlled opposition?
☝?This
Yes. In a word: plant
Edit: alternate given by u/FiatLux
Obviously she could easily be bought. You think 3 letter agencies and demoncrates didn't know about her? Lol its all part of the game.
bingo. she was a 'project' from the start. i thought she was entertaining but she didnt say much of anything at cpac - once you heard her try to articulate some conservative principles she was like a fish out of water. too bad but its a good lesson for us all
That would be the short play, but not the long con.
The investigation she did was easy-Peasy if you can navigate a SOS website and know a little corporate law. That excludes about 75% of our population but I digress.
The average person has no knowledge of corporate law, including me. Most people don't know the amendments or constitutional law either.
My point exactly
What is concerning is that the Democrats didn't.