562
posted ago by pcpoet ago by pcpoet +562 / -0

Three months ago President Trump with much fan fair set up a private blog page. He allowed individuals to take his blog entries and post them on other platforms. he made it simple to post if they a member of the other platform. All three platforms responded by blocking those who were members of there social networks from being able to post links to Trumps Blog. Today trump announced a class action law suit. My thought is that trumps creation of this blog was actualy a trap meant to show that there is coordination between theses three tech entities and there CEOs. I think the way president Trump is going to bring theses companies down is to show that the censorship going on is coordinated and that it also tied to political actors within the us government.

This was edited to make it easier to read. dyslexic so this is the cleanest I can make it.

Comments (109)
sorted by:
70
deleted 70 points ago +70 / -0
60
qwhyamihere 60 points ago +61 / -1

I'd be fine with a penny for every shadow banned post, deleted comment or otherwise censored speech.

I could probably retire.

48
Dardar 48 points ago +48 / -0

That would be nice, however Trump said this wasn't about getting a settlement, it's about restoring our rights.

Also, if I recall correctly, NOT seeking a settlement makes it harder for a judge to reject the case or something along those lines...

23
qwhyamihere 23 points ago +23 / -0

Very true, if I could just say whatever I wanted and they couldn't delete shit, that would mean more than any $$$ can buy. Finally got around to watching it and yes he addresses my smart ass remark at 41 minutes. No settlement. https://rumble.com/vjjcwn-afpi-constitutional-litigation-partnership.html

30
Dardar 30 points ago +30 / -0

Free speech is monumentally important, really truly foundational to a free society.

Censorship is evil.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
20
AngelCole 20 points ago +20 / -0

They are specifically asking for punitive damages and said it could be in the trillions.

3
ZerroDefex 3 points ago +3 / -0

In addition to ending the censorship, he just means they won't accept a settlement to drop the case.

17
MegoThor 17 points ago +17 / -0

Nothing restores rights faster than a trillion dollar law suite.

Makes others think twice before doing the same thing, too.

14
hydra12340 14 points ago +14 / -0

It SHOULD be about restoration of our freedoms. The bastards have almost done away with the 1st amendment completely. How the hell does zuckerburg get the right to tell me what the hell I can speak about? Shove that little asshole's wakeboard or whatever rich piece of shit it is up his ass and pump away.

4
KevB 4 points ago +8 / -4

They will sue for $$. How do you think the attorneys are going to get paid? Sign up here: https://americafirstpolicy.com/latest/the-america-first-policy-institute-applauds-lawsuit-to-hold-big-tech-accountable/

1
Truthislite 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not the right website don't do it.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
GQD_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Regulate?

Or KILL?

We The People

1
B7447 1 point ago +1 / -0

Haha no doubt, very true!

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
12
Tellstruth 12 points ago +12 / -0

Problem with me is I did not use them. Instead, avoided them like the Covid Poison Jab.

17
Tradox 17 points ago +17 / -0

bring in Reddit and almost all of us were involved in one way or another. I was a member of r/thedonald when it was essentially banned.

9
Macho_MaamV2 9 points ago +9 / -0

The admins over there seem to be getting ready to do the same thing to Superstonk. The same flimsy excuses about brigading and mentioning movie stock like it was with r/redacted.

See this shit coming a mile away.

5
magaBBC 5 points ago +5 / -0

This!!!

4
MAGAngelo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ahhhh the good old quarantine days

4
catbertz 4 points ago +4 / -0

We're were quarantined before it became a world wide thing. Fake bullshit for us, fake bullshit for the world.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
pcpoet [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

depends on the perimeters of the law suit. I suspect any one who has had there social media accounts pulled can. I my self I am sure cant becouse I have never been banned off theses sites.

4
lilsparrow 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm sure the nature of the banning might count as well. My original Twitter account was banned, but only because I supposedly offended an alphabet person during pride month 2-3 years ago, even though I never did.

Turns out I was dog-pilled for supporting comics-gate. A blog site kept a list of people that they tried to get banned constantly. Eventually I just got hit.

12
ZerroDefex 12 points ago +12 / -0

I just got a strike for a post from last September, it was a meme pic about how Chicago was safer under Al Capone than Larry Lightfoot.

12
AmyMulls1971 12 points ago +12 / -0

😂Larry🤣

4
SoMuchWinning45 4 points ago +4 / -0

Beetlejuice

1
DrMcCoy 1 point ago +1 / -0

General Ackbar is its twin: https://i.imgflip.com/4e2fu1.jpg

1
ZerroDefex 1 point ago +1 / -0

"She" certainly has that Innsmouth look.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
ZerroDefex 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Reporting a business that stayed open during COVID? You did the reich thing."

1
TangoWhiskeyFoxtrot 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s ok none of us can put a price on freedom

3
killacommieforyourmo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, they mentioned the website in todaysboress conference.

25
Mr_A 25 points ago +25 / -0

Top-notch analysis! I think you're right. There was easily a case to make before he had his own website; but the website and the links, as you point out, make it crystal clear and precise. Tying it to the government is a step further, and I don't see how his website helps. But I'm sure the goods are in there somewhere...

21
pcpoet [S] 21 points ago +21 / -0

if it gets to discovery I believe there will be communication traffic between the three CEOs and individuals in government on how to best silence the blog. there also will be internal communications with in the company on how to deal with the Blog.

6
Macho_MaamV2 6 points ago +6 / -0

Communications that were most likely being monitored by Space Force. So they can try to hide it but they already have the goods. Just like the election.

17
pcpoet [S] 17 points ago +17 / -0

I think that the Blog was done to create a communications trail tying together the three CEO and people in government to blocking posts that came from or were inspired by Trumps Blog.

12
Mr_A 12 points ago +12 / -0

Very likely. It's also a likely reason for why some of the communications were really strange, with a few of them being only one or two sentences, some sounding like uncontroversial platitudes, and others very political and confrontational-sounding.

17
pcpoet [S] 17 points ago +17 / -0

sort of showing that they wanted to ban anything that came from trumps mouth even stuff that was benign in nature like So and so is a great guy or my grand children are great kids.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
23
ThebigLMAOski17 23 points ago +23 / -0

This entire thing has been one big setup.

They brought Trump in to take down the deep state, he was the ringer.

They stopped the DS from stealing in 2016... thats why they all looked like drooling retards with their predictions... and why they all looked like they just got sentenced to life in prison for a week after.

The day after the 2016 election you could see it on their faces... they were in shocked horror... not because Trump won... but because they knew they had been caught.

She was never supposed to lose.

Trumps victory meant the good guys had discovered their cheating, and their crimes, and therefore they all knew the good guys had discovered everyone's crimes.

Politicians on both sides, hollywood, music industry, big pharma, big "science", big indoctrination (in our education system).

They knew the game was over... but they also knew it would take a long time to untie this knot.

So they fired up their propaganda machine and cranked it up to 11 to delay and stall and try to take him out of office with lie after lie after lie to get them to the 2020 election... where they could do this virus shit and the CCP virus.

ALL OF IT has been witnessed

ALL OF IT will be used against them

ALL OF THEM are going down one way or another

For their sake they better hope it's the easy way... because the hard way means all of us taking out the few of them.

5
FreedomLover21 5 points ago +5 / -0

Excellent analysis! I especially like the last sentence!

19
g8rb81 19 points ago +20 / -1

the censorship going on is coordinated

makes it a RICO case.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
14
Blurpy 14 points ago +15 / -1

The entire last 5 years has been a trap. That is a fact.

This plan has been well more than a decade in the making.

The DS and Cabal's future actions were so predictable, and they just couldn't help themselves. They have repeatedly stuck their necks in the noose, over and over and over again.

Enjoy the show!

14
Wayshuba 14 points ago +14 / -0

Just want to make a correction on one thing in your otherwise correct assessment, the plan has been in the making for three generations. It started in 1964.

What makes good actors? White hats being entrenched at high-levels of the globalist elites. It takes multiple generations to get that in place.

Why do you think "we have it all"?

8
Blurpy 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yes, that's true - since Kennedy. I was speaking more of the calendar planning right down to the specific days aligning with certain holidays, and so on. Fine tuning the plan for Trump's acceptance of the recruitment effort by the Generals, etc.

What a WONDERFUL time to be alive and witness this. It really is the death of one age, and the dawn of a new age. We are about to have some bumpy weeks ahead, but we can all feel that it is getting CLOSE.

5
Macho_MaamV2 5 points ago +5 / -0

November 24th, 1963

1
skf93 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wouldn't the deep state have blackmail on anyone at high levels within the government? Wouldn't they try to control them that way?

4
Wayshuba 4 points ago +4 / -0

Were they able to blackmail Trump? Gen. Flynn? Adm. Rogers?

As Q has said, they are only able to blackmail those who are already of criminal character.

Believe it or not, the club of corruption and treason is much smaller than people realize. They appear larger because they occupy positions of power and they have the MSM and Big Tech to assist them.

9
EarnYourVote 9 points ago +9 / -0

Makes sense. Otherwise, it is not like Trump to have jumped into the blog thing only to turn it off a week or so later.

8
Fefifofumdrum 8 points ago +8 / -0

Of course he did. He's 50 moves ahead.

6
numina18 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hope it’s true!

6
HumblePede 6 points ago +6 / -0

Highly relevant drop I commented on in another thread: drop #830.

What I say a class action lawsuit?

When is it effective?

Who controls the narrative?

WHO wrote the singular censorship algorithm?

WHO deployed the algorithm?

WHO instructed them to deploy the algorithm?

SAME embed across multiple platforms.

Why?

Why is the timing relevant?

Where is @Snowden?

Why did ES leave G?

Why has NK out of the news cycle?

Define false flag?

What event(s) change the news cycle?

Why didn’t LV change the news cycle?

You have more than your know.

BOOM.

Q

3
Dardar 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can you please let me know where you commented on this Q drop? I'm currently having an EPIC brainstorm and need to compare notes somewhere...

3
HumblePede 3 points ago +3 / -0

I see you found my other post. Interesting times. ES's potential role in algo creation/deployment is definitely worth a deep dive. The fabric of the deep state's duplicity is starting the fray. The more we pick at those loose strings, the more we tear the whole shebang apart.

NCSWIC

3
Dardar 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep. I'm new to Q, but I hadn't seen a thorough explanation of this drop. Many think ES leave G is referring to Eric Schmidt leaving Google. But I naively thought it meant Edward Snowden leaving Government.

Many people still think Snowden is some kind of angel. He's constantly trying to make himself out to be the innocent whistleblower by releasing pathetic feelgood interviews and writing wistful philosophical essays. It's every bit as freakish as Bill Gates PR bullshit. His name ought to be Snowjob.

Anyway, I was thinking he is definitely capable of writing that algorithm. So perhaps it's no wonder he wasn't pardoned by Trump.

2
HumblePede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Welcome!

I'm sure you'll find lots to ponder here. My biggest suggestion would be to read as much as you can and verify whenever possible. It's easy for any/all of us to misinterpret or misconstrue evidence - even with the best of intentions, so when we work together to share info and research we can keep each other on the most likely logical path to liberty and freedom.

WWG1WGA_WW

1
469273 1 point ago +1 / -0

That doesn’t make sense q reference @snowden right above. Learn the comms. Es = Eric Schmidt

1
Dardar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, see where I said I'm NEW and made a naive mistake. There's a lot I need to learn.

1
CokeOrPepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

ES?

2
HumblePede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Possibly Edward Snowden (that was my initial thought). Or maybe Eric Schmidt. In the context of drop #830 either could make sense. Maybe others will chime in with their thoughts as well.

1
469273 1 point ago +1 / -0

Eric Schmidt. Former google boss.

5
Immysteryman 5 points ago +5 / -0

One of the things necessary for a class to proceed is commonality. If damages vary - no commonality. If injuries vary, no commonality. Here, the same info was blocked and people banned for IDENTICAL (My Cousin Vinny) messages. That’s commonality. I agree with poster - Trump played them

5
Warren_Puffitt 5 points ago +5 / -0

Anybody else notice that FB Messenger blocks any link to GAW? It's true - since it existed. We should join the suit en masse.

2
Nomoralcompass89 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, if you want to try another trick, try typing in "Eric Ciaramella".

2
leg_hairs 2 points ago +2 / -0

.win domains are blocked by in general a lot of cell service providers I’ve heard. It’s different I know just saying.

4
Taffy333 4 points ago +4 / -0

Good analysis and I like it!

4
TigerGirl12 4 points ago +4 / -0

The timing is perfect. Yes, I believe he’s set them up. The Maricopia audit will be coming out in a couple of weeks. If they block any or all of that info couldn’t that be treason? Add that to all our restrictions and silencing.

4
checkmateanon 4 points ago +4 / -0

Rudy is the master of rico cases - and DJT knows how To win lawsuits - good combo

2
skf93 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unfortunately Rudy doesn't have his law license anymore. Maybe he could be an advisor.

3
Graceunderfire 3 points ago +3 / -0

Of course he can advise, he just cant plead the case in front of the judge, which is probably for the best hes getting old.

3
Caprica777 3 points ago +3 / -0

Let’s not forget about the guy from google who walked into the justice department? At the end of Trumps term with his laptop and all the access passwords. I never heard anything again about that guy.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Shalimar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Takeonbigtech.com Go here to sign onto the class action lawsuit.

2
huntfishpede 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Some platforms will collapse under own weight of ILLEGAL activities" (emphasis mine)

2
anotherdream 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'll join that shit in a heartbeat. - They were blocking informational links I was sending to my family to prevent them from getting the jab. - I didn't want my family to go through with it, and tried to send them some links to some videos and websites with data, and the private messages kept getting deleted, leaving behind a message saying that the information was deemed unsuitable or high-risk. - Bunch of a fucking bullshit.

2
tgeorge432 2 points ago +2 / -0

Great job for a dyslexic person. As an old English teacher I am impressed

2
inspoken 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Antenna 2 points ago +2 / -0

That was the hardest thing to read I've ever come across. I stumbled over every period, thinking they were commas because the next sentence didn't start with a capital. And those mystery words like "theses" and "alloewd" Then there is "trumps" - wow. Is there more than one of him?!?! "Trump" starts out with a capital T and "blog" is lower case. By next sentence, blog is capitalized and the president is now "trump". But the "there" for "their" was the most confusing.

What is the message?!?

2
pcpoet [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

sorry.. I tried to clean it up but I am just not the best at grammar

2
CokeOrPepe 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m sorry you just had to deal with that.

1
Shanjaq 1 point ago +1 / -0

thinking about this thread as I was taking a nap, I randomly imagined a future without facebook, and felt a large volume of pressure lift out of my head-space, followed by dull, aching .. Relief. it was as if I had been carrying a burden for so long it numbed the load-bearing muscles & sinew, and removing it only briefly woke them up and unmuted the pain. social media was a mistake

1
raggedyman74 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good fucking point dude

1
007wannabee 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sorry but it all mostly seems like whining to me. Their site their rules.

I am old and I used the internet before FB, Google, or Twitter even existed. We had no free speech problems back then as I recall. I don't understand why folk insist on using new-fangled big tech sites then complain when they get a "bad user experience." If you don't like the way you get treated in Walmart then shop somewhere else.

Maybe the collusion aspect has some merit I will agree that.

3
469273 3 points ago +3 / -0

Shill

0
007wannabee 0 points ago +1 / -1

I am not a shill!

Don't we have site rules on greatawakening? Why should FB &co not have rules for their site too. No-one in their right mind should be using their sites I agree.

Disclaimer: I am not in America and there is no Constitution or 1st Amendment where I live. We have to fight it out for ourselves. Maybe things just look different to us.

1
ZerroDefex 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sounds like you didn't actually listen to the press conference, they laid out your counterargument as well but the issue is that they're not acting as private companies but acting as unofficial government agencies trying to control info and free speech. The private company excuse goes out the window when government has a hotline to you to demand someone be banned.

1
007wannabee 1 point ago +1 / -0

OK maybe I am just over-sensitive because I don't like them. Before those companies came along the internet standard for discussion on any topic was NNTP Usenet news. This was functionally fairly simple but worked fantastically. It was impossible to ban anyone or tell them what to say or not say. Of course this attracted spammers and bad actors but they effectively banned themselves very quickly because it was so easy for people block them en masse.

Then along came the monolithic American tech companies who cleverly attracted users to their sites by offering more than just discussion. Facebook was great in 2008 when I first used it as a genuine social nexus. Eventually Usenet degenerated into the mere pirate fileswapping system that it is now.

I would like to see those pre-facebook days return. I don't think setting up clones/alternatives like Parler or whatever are the answer, we need something which guarantees your right to free speech while also guaranteeing your right to not have to listen to someone else's speech if you don't like it.

1
AngelCole 1 point ago +1 / -0

He said possibly trillions too. Think about that, how much will we all get if we've been de-platformed. I had a Twitter long before President Trump ran for president. They suspended me indefinitely right after they removed his in January, it might have been the same day, either the 7th or 8th.

1
Lupinate 1 point ago +1 / -0

As i dont really use any such platforms and havent for years, ill be just watching whilst eating popcorn.

That said, trump didnt need a trap for this. They have had meetings where censorship in tandem was the topic a few years back, and were stupid enough to broadcast that fact to the media at the time.

1
dildoschwaggins 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think this is perfectly executed analysis.

1
RoloTomassi1723 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've been kicked off Twatter at least 5 times and had over 2K videos deleted off Yootube. Never have been on FB

1
jfunction 1 point ago +1 / -0

Great, clear post.

1
CQVFEFE 1 point ago +1 / -0

dyslexic

OK here goes an old one

I know an insomniac dyslexic agnostic. She lies awake at night, wondering if there really is a Dog.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Woefully_Inept 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lmao holy shit he totally honey pot'd them hahhaahha

1
SoMuchWinning45 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hell, you can't share posts on here through Fakebook messages. Can I join in the fun?

1
SuckaFree 1 point ago +1 / -0

This may very well bring these companies down a few pegs.

1
Xx_patriotcommander_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Damn this man is the realist G.O.A.T ever, He'll be my commander and cheif for lyfe

1
highlandparker 1 point ago +1 / -0

I love it!

0
ExDem 0 points ago +1 / -1

FB blocked links I tried to message to my buddies from the ol r/The_Donald subreddit.

Also, I recently noticed I can’t find THIS website when searching through chrome. I mean I can find it, but when I click on it, it says something is wrong with this site. But when I search through DuckDuckGo it works fine.