So of Twitter claims to own the content posted there, that opens them to liability for the ISIS beheadings and child porn that they allow on their site. If they claim they don't own it, they are forced to allow anything back up that is not explicitly illegal. Does this sound about right?
Indeed, they are forced once and for all to choose between enjoying the curation power of a publisher or the hands-off indemnity of a platform, NOT both as they have abused for too long.
So of Twitter claims to own the content posted there, that opens them to liability for the ISIS beheadings and child porn that they allow on their site. If they claim they don't own it, they are forced to allow anything back up that is not explicitly illegal. Does this sound about right?
Indeed, they are forced once and for all to choose between enjoying the curation power of a publisher or the hands-off indemnity of a platform, NOT both as they have abused for too long.