Mathematical analyses showed that 70% vaccination hits the perfect ratio of people with debilitating diseases and healthy people - just enough to keep the healthy people going, looking after the sick, but not too much to make them say "you are on your own"
Deagel’s forecast for the U.S. is a decline in population from 327 million (2017) to 100 million in 2025. That’s an unexplained -70% decline in U.S. population. What does Deagel know that we don’t know? Either a lot of Americans are going to be emigrating or dying.
Deagel population forecast for US in 2025 is 100M which is a 70% reduction of the current population of 330M... Deagel took down its 2025 forecasts after people realized that the US, Canada, Australia and all of western Europe were forecasted to have massive depopulation by 2025
Based on what though? Covid? Is god protecting us? Is their plandemic fizzling out like a discount bottle rocket? Or will the evil villains succeed in the plot to rule the world? Tune in tomorrow on
Clown World all day every day every channel
Lord help us.
It goes something like this... 1 person infects another person R=1.
1 person infects only 30% (un-jabbed) = 0.3 of a person or R= 0.3
Of course it the natural R number is 10 then 1 person infects (30% of 10 people) or 3 people.
So you have to guess that 30% = R1 so the actual R number is 100/30 or 3.3333
So if the natural R rate is 3.3333 and 30% are un-vaccinated you won't see an increase in the number of infected, they will just roll around getting infected, having the virus, passing it on, and then getting better.
I believe 70% actually means 30%. They pad the numbers to pressure people who haven’t gotten it yet. I’d be interested in finding out how many vaccines were distributed to each facility. I think a lot of places didn’t offer the jab because of the requirements and they didn’t want the liability.
What’s odd is most of the people who did get it were in retirement homes and on Medicare.. and coincidentally the largest voting population this past election cycle 🤔🧐
Mathematical analyses showed that 70% vaccination hits the perfect ratio of people with debilitating diseases and healthy people - just enough to keep the healthy people going, looking after the sick, but not too much to make them say "you are on your own"
I hope /s tag is not needed
That 70 percent is also identical to deagel.com 2025 depopulation forecast for the united States. Deagel is a highly regarded military assessment and intelligence corporation that is known as a CIA-front company.
Deagel’s forecast for the U.S. is a decline in population from 327 million (2017) to 100 million in 2025. That’s an unexplained -70% decline in U.S. population. What does Deagel know that we don’t know? Either a lot of Americans are going to be emigrating or dying.
Scary shit right there.
That would mean total societal collapse, a new dark ages.
Wow nice doom porn there let's hope it isn't that bad. Which really it already is.
Oh boy. -Fred Flintstone
Deagel population forecast for US in 2025 is 100M which is a 70% reduction of the current population of 330M... Deagel took down its 2025 forecasts after people realized that the US, Canada, Australia and all of western Europe were forecasted to have massive depopulation by 2025
Based on what though? Covid? Is god protecting us? Is their plandemic fizzling out like a discount bottle rocket? Or will the evil villains succeed in the plot to rule the world? Tune in tomorrow on Clown World all day every day every channel Lord help us.
Guess the goal is around 70% sterilized or dead.
It goes something like this... 1 person infects another person R=1. 1 person infects only 30% (un-jabbed) = 0.3 of a person or R= 0.3
Of course it the natural R number is 10 then 1 person infects (30% of 10 people) or 3 people.
So you have to guess that 30% = R1 so the actual R number is 100/30 or 3.3333
So if the natural R rate is 3.3333 and 30% are un-vaccinated you won't see an increase in the number of infected, they will just roll around getting infected, having the virus, passing it on, and then getting better.
That's if the vaccines work.
I had seen it explained as the amount of population reduction required to align with Agenda 2030
I believe 70% actually means 30%. They pad the numbers to pressure people who haven’t gotten it yet. I’d be interested in finding out how many vaccines were distributed to each facility. I think a lot of places didn’t offer the jab because of the requirements and they didn’t want the liability. What’s odd is most of the people who did get it were in retirement homes and on Medicare.. and coincidentally the largest voting population this past election cycle 🤔🧐