"Lin Wood's whistleblower is a man who went by the name Ryan Dark White. He now declares his true name to be Jonathan Ambrose McGreevy. What we know for a fact is that he is a two time convicted drug felon. But when asked to describe his experience/history, he offers up very different accounts. In April 2018, he told Attorney Ty Clevenger that he was in the Army, attended a Catholic seminary, was ordained a minister and then worked as a private investigator.
By January 2021 White is telling a remarkably different tale. He claims to hold graduate degrees in physics, chemistry, biology and mathematics and states that he attended University of Pennsylvania, John Hopkins University, University of Maryland and Green College at Oxford University. He does not provide any independent proof to corroborate these claims.
Next up is White's interview with Stew Peters. White insists his true name is Jonathan McGreevy and, according to Peters, claims to have worked on encryption for the U.S. intelligence community and then worked with the top secret National Reconnaissance Office.
This video shows White's conflicting accounts. You can judge for yourself."
So he could be a private investigator with a fake identity, which would be fairly normal for a secret agent type.
Or he could be a multi-discipline, top secret researcher who actually worked on encryption for the U.S. intelligence community and then worked with the top secret National Reconnaissance Office, and used a fake identity as part of his cover for working with military/IC.
His conflicting statements regarding his identity do not necessarily discredit the information he is providing.
There was an article written by a journalist at the gateway pundit, addressing claims recently made on my show by Dr. Jonathan McGreevey (@Johnheretohelp).
The interview has been removed from the public view, but in no way was it deleted.
It was removed pending an internal investigation, and the removal of the interview should IN NO WAY be perceived as a lack of confidence in the credibility of Dr. Jonathan McGreevey.
Let me deal with the claim that by helping to expose con man "Dr." Joseph McGreevey, I am somehow attacking Lin Wood, and by association, Sidney Powell and General Michael Flynn. This is not true. I've said from the beginning I think Lin made a huge mistake endorsing and promoting @johnheretohelp. I've always been clear about this. Is asking someone who was tricked by a con man to go back and look again 'attacking them'? Because I don't think so. Now Sidney and Mike fully endorse Lin Wood. They are good friends with him. But as far as I have ever seen, Sidney and Mike have never endorsed or promoted John McGreevey or the stories he's been telling. ONLY Lin Wood endorsed McGreevey. Sidney and Mike never have that I have seen. But I keep hearing that my asking Lin Wood to go back and revisit his endorsement of McGreevey, is an 'attack' on him, and that I'm also attacking Sidney and the General. That's not what I'm doing, and it's bizarre to hear people claim this.
I believe strongly that Stew Peters is a truth-giver. We have had many private conversations. I know Stew shares my faith in Jesus Christ. I trust Stew.
Like me, Stew is doing his imperfect best to speak truth to the American public.
I understand that Stew temporarily removed his interview with John McGreevey after he leaned of the Larry Johnson article. I understand why he chose to do so.
I am not going to remove the whistleblower’s interviews with me until a reliable third party demonstrates that his accusations are false. I stand by my determination that I found Ryan Dark White (Dr. McGreevey) to be credible and that responsible members of law enforcement or journalists should investigate his accusations to determine truth or falsity.
Was I played by Ryan Dark White so that I could be discredited? That is possible but I have not been presented evidence to challenge his accusations as false. Perhaps I will be in the future when law enforcement or journalists investigate his accusations. Time will tell.
Of course there is always the question of who would be behind efforts to discredit me by using Ryan Dark White if that turns out to be the case.
I have been very troubled by the "revelations" of Lin's whistleblowers.
It is difficult for me to believe the accusations that have been made regarding Mike Pence. (And I'm not talking about whatever deals he made to certify a fraudulent election.)
It is also difficult for me to believe that Lin would not thoroughly vet these whistleblowers, having been a practicing attorney for over 40 years.
From the video description:
"Lin Wood's whistleblower is a man who went by the name Ryan Dark White. He now declares his true name to be Jonathan Ambrose McGreevy. What we know for a fact is that he is a two time convicted drug felon. But when asked to describe his experience/history, he offers up very different accounts. In April 2018, he told Attorney Ty Clevenger that he was in the Army, attended a Catholic seminary, was ordained a minister and then worked as a private investigator.
By January 2021 White is telling a remarkably different tale. He claims to hold graduate degrees in physics, chemistry, biology and mathematics and states that he attended University of Pennsylvania, John Hopkins University, University of Maryland and Green College at Oxford University. He does not provide any independent proof to corroborate these claims.
Next up is White's interview with Stew Peters. White insists his true name is Jonathan McGreevy and, according to Peters, claims to have worked on encryption for the U.S. intelligence community and then worked with the top secret National Reconnaissance Office.
This video shows White's conflicting accounts. You can judge for yourself."
So he could be a private investigator with a fake identity, which would be fairly normal for a secret agent type.
Or he could be a multi-discipline, top secret researcher who actually worked on encryption for the U.S. intelligence community and then worked with the top secret National Reconnaissance Office, and used a fake identity as part of his cover for working with military/IC.
His conflicting statements regarding his identity do not necessarily discredit the information he is providing.
https://t.me/stewpeters/4521
There was an article written by a journalist at the gateway pundit, addressing claims recently made on my show by Dr. Jonathan McGreevey (@Johnheretohelp).
The interview has been removed from the public view, but in no way was it deleted.
It was removed pending an internal investigation, and the removal of the interview should IN NO WAY be perceived as a lack of confidence in the credibility of Dr. Jonathan McGreevey.
https://t.me/drawandstrikechannel/7386
Let me deal with the claim that by helping to expose con man "Dr." Joseph McGreevey, I am somehow attacking Lin Wood, and by association, Sidney Powell and General Michael Flynn. This is not true. I've said from the beginning I think Lin made a huge mistake endorsing and promoting @johnheretohelp. I've always been clear about this. Is asking someone who was tricked by a con man to go back and look again 'attacking them'? Because I don't think so. Now Sidney and Mike fully endorse Lin Wood. They are good friends with him. But as far as I have ever seen, Sidney and Mike have never endorsed or promoted John McGreevey or the stories he's been telling. ONLY Lin Wood endorsed McGreevey. Sidney and Mike never have that I have seen. But I keep hearing that my asking Lin Wood to go back and revisit his endorsement of McGreevey, is an 'attack' on him, and that I'm also attacking Sidney and the General. That's not what I'm doing, and it's bizarre to hear people claim this.
https://t.me/linwoodspeakstruth/4006
I believe strongly that Stew Peters is a truth-giver. We have had many private conversations. I know Stew shares my faith in Jesus Christ. I trust Stew.
Like me, Stew is doing his imperfect best to speak truth to the American public.
I understand that Stew temporarily removed his interview with John McGreevey after he leaned of the Larry Johnson article. I understand why he chose to do so.
I am not going to remove the whistleblower’s interviews with me until a reliable third party demonstrates that his accusations are false. I stand by my determination that I found Ryan Dark White (Dr. McGreevey) to be credible and that responsible members of law enforcement or journalists should investigate his accusations to determine truth or falsity.
Was I played by Ryan Dark White so that I could be discredited? That is possible but I have not been presented evidence to challenge his accusations as false. Perhaps I will be in the future when law enforcement or journalists investigate his accusations. Time will tell.
Of course there is always the question of who would be behind efforts to discredit me by using Ryan Dark White if that turns out to be the case.
We live in extraordinary times.
I have been very troubled by the "revelations" of Lin's whistleblowers.
It is difficult for me to believe the accusations that have been made regarding Mike Pence. (And I'm not talking about whatever deals he made to certify a fraudulent election.)
It is also difficult for me to believe that Lin would not thoroughly vet these whistleblowers, having been a practicing attorney for over 40 years.
So I'm on the fence on this.
CIA SPOOK.