I'm reading through it some more and this lawsuit filed yesterday kicks ass!
They completely call out the deep state for all their bullshit, here are some highlights (this is just a fraction as I'm still reading through it now):
- The Defendants either did lie about asymptomatic spread, or were simply wrong about the science. The theory of asymptomatic transmission — used as the justification for the lockdown and masking of the healthy — was based solely upon mathematical modeling. This theory had no actual study participants, and no peer review. The authors made the unfounded assumption that asymptomatic persons were “75% as infectious” as symptomatic persons. But in the real world, healthy false positives turned out to be merely healthy, and were never shown to be “asymptomatic” carriers of anything.
- Studies have shown that PCR test positive asymptomatic individuals do not induce clinical COVID-19 disease, not even in a family member with whom they share a home and extended proximity.
- According to a study published by the NIH, the ARR (absolute risk reduction) for the Pfizer Vaccine is a mere 0.7%, and the ARR for the Moderna Vaccine is only 1.1%
- Using PCR tests to diagnose anything let alone with 35+ cycles is worthless
- The extremely broad and unprecedented criteria for coding covid19 deaths inflated the death counts
- The vaccines are showing an unprecedented safety signal in the VAERS data with deaths jumping 12,000%
- The vaccines have no long term safety data in humans and were only tested in animals for 60 days then halted
- Since there's no risk of asymptomatic spread and the overall IFR is 0.15% (which includes the inflated death counts) there was never any justification for ANY of the EUA's for the PCR tests nor the vaccines
- Vaccines were authorized without any studies demonstrating where the spike proteins traveled in the body following vaccination, how long they remain active and what effect they have
- No one independently verified the gene sequence sent by the Chinese
- A number of studies were deemed unnecessary and not performed prior to administration in human subjects, including single dose toxicity, toxicokinetic, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, prenatal and postnatal development, offspring, local tolerance, teratogenic and postnatal toxicity and fertility
- Deploying leaky vaccines during the middle of a pandemic has been shown to cause more virulent strains
- The mRNA Vaccines induce our cells to manufacture (virus-free) “spike proteins.” The “spike proteins” are in the same family as the naturally occurring syncytin-1 and syncytin-2 reproductive proteins in sperm, ova and placenta. Antibodies raised against the spike protein might interact with the naturally occurring syncytin proteins, adversely affecting multiple steps in human reproduction
- A study recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine, “Preliminary Findings of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons,” exposes that pregnant women receiving Vaccines during their first or second trimesters suffer an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing 4 out of 5 unborn babies
- A leaked Pfizer document exposes that Pfizer Vaccine nanoparticles accumulate in the ovaries at an extraordinarily high rate, in concentrations orders of magnitude higher than in other tissues. Billions of aggressive spike proteins are accumulating in very delicate ovarian tissues
- Presently, the vaccinated are permitted to donate their spike protein laden blood into the blood supply, which projects all of the risks discussed supra onto the general population of unvaccinated blood donees
- Fifty-seven top scientists and doctors from Central and South America are calling for an immediate end to all Vaccine COVID-19 programs. Other physician-scientist groups have made similar calls, among them: Canadian Physicians, Israeli People’s Committee, Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, World Doctors Alliance, Doctors 4 Covid Ethics, and Plaintiff America’s Frontline Doctors
- In the past, government has halted vaccine trials based on a tiny fraction — far less than 1% — of the number of unexplained deaths already recorded. The scientists all agree that the spike protein (produced by the Vaccines) causes disease even without the virus
- There are numerous alternative safe and effective treatments for COVID-19. These alternatives are supported by over 300 studies, including randomized controlled studies. Tens of thousands of physicians have publicly attested, and many have testified under oath, as to the safety and efficacy of the alternatives Inexplicably, the Defendants never formed or assigned a task force to research and review existing alternatives for preventing and treating COVID-19. Instead, the Defendants and others set about censoring both concerns about the Vaccines, and information about safe and effective alternatives
- Defendants have failed to educate the American public that the FDA has not actually “approved” the Vaccines, and that the DHHS Secretary has not in fact determined that the Vaccines are “safe and effective,” and on the contrary has merely determined, in accordance with the proverbial “weasel language” of the EUA statute, that “it is reasonable to believe” that the Vaccines “may be” effective and that the benefits outweigh the risks. Instead of being so educated, the public is barraged with unqualified “safe and effective” messaging from all levels of federal and state government, the private sector and the media
- After a year of sustained psychological manipulation, the population is now weakened, frightened, desperate for a return of their freedoms, prosperity and normal lives, and especially vulnerable to pressure to take the Vaccine. The lockdowns and shutdowns, the myriad rules and regulations, the confusing and self-contradictory controls, the enforced docility, and the consequent demoralization, anxiety and helplessness are typical of authoritarian and totalitarian conditions. This degree of systemic and purposeful coercion means that Americans cannot give truly free and voluntary informed consent to the Vaccines.
The lawsuit also includes this:
Virtually all scientists, including Dr. Fauci, agree that any PCR test run at a CT value of 35-cycles or greater is useless. Dr. Fauci has stated (emphasis below added):
What is now evolving into a bit of a standard is that if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more that the chances of it being replication competent are miniscule…We have patients, and it is very frustrating for the patients as well as for the physicians…somebody comes in and they repeat their PCR and it’s like 37 cycle threshold…you can almost never culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle. So I think if somebody does come in with 37, 38, even 36, you gotta say, you know, it’s dead nucleotides, period. In other words, it is not a COVID-19 infection.
A study funded by the French government showed that even at 35-cycles, the false positivity rate is as high as 97%. Despite this, a majority of the PCR tests for COVID-19 deployed under EUAs in the United States are run at 35-45 cycles in accordance with manufacturer instructions. Under the EUAs issued by the FDA, there is no flexibility to depart from the manufacturer’s instructions and change the way in which the test is administered or interpreted. The chart below shows that all major PCR tests in use in the United States are run at cycles of up to 35 or higher.
Manufacturer’s Recommended Cycle Threshold:
- Xiamen Zeesan SARS-CoV-2 Test Kit (Real-time PCR) 45 cycles
- Opti Sars CoV-2 RT-PCR Test 45 cycles
- Quest SARS-CoV-2rRT-PCR Test 40 cycles
- CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus Real Time (RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel) Test 40 cycles
- Wren Labs COVID-19 PCR Test 38 cycles
- LabCorp COVID-19 RT-PCR Test 35 cycles
======================================================
Extra sauce: Thomas Renz // Renz Law https://renz-law.com
His entire firm is dedicated to fighting for "Medical Freedom." They work closely with Frontline Docs. https://renz-law.com/our-medical-freedom-fight
45K DEATH COUNT FROM COVID SHOT LAWSUIT -- Copy of Complaint and Whistleblower Declaration https://renz-law.com/45k-whistleblower-suit
PDF of Lawsuit: https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/3c6a0774-cfad-46fa-aa97-af5aa5e74f00/M%20for%20PI%20file%20stamped.pdf
PDF of whistleblower affidavit: https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/3c6a0774-cfad-46fa-aa97-af5aa5e74f00/Jane%20Doe%20Declaration.pdf
I haven’t finished reading it all but it sure looks like a bombshell. Hoping it’s not just tossed out for “lack of standing” or “timing” like everything else.
"They're killing people!"
"Did they kill you?"
"No"
"LACK OF STANDING! Case dismissed."
Sadly this is a realistic response to expect! Lack of standing since the plaintiff is alive, “timing” if the plaintiff is dead!